Cryoballoon Pulmonary Venous Isolation in Patients Referred for Typical Atrial Flutter Ablation
PAF CRIOBLAF
Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation by Combined Right Isthmus Ablation and cryoBalloon Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Typical Atrial Flutter
1 other identifier
interventional
76
1 country
15
Brief Summary
\- Background: Atrial fibrillation is frequently associated with typical atrial flutter in clinical practice. If the radical treatment of atrial flutter by radiofrequency catheter is achieved in most cases without recurrence, it does not prevent the occurrence of atrial fibrillation that occurs in about 70% of these patients after several years of follow-up. However, the latter arrhythmia is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The problem of atrial fibrillation occurrence after successful ablation of typical atrial flutter remains physicians primary concern in monitoring these patients.
- Objectives: The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the pulmonary veins isolation using balloon cryotherapy technology performed at the time of flutter ablation, significantly reduces the risk of developing atrial fibrillation in the two year period following the procedure.
- Selection Criteria: Patients referred for ablation of typical atrial flutter with an history of at least one documented episode of atrial fibrillation (atrial flutter remaining the predominant arrhythmia)will be enrolled in the study.
- Study Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, 2-arms study, comparing the rate of atrial fibrillation occurrence over a two years period following either an ablation procedure of typical atrial flutter (Group 1), or a combined procedure of typical atrial flutter ablation and pulmonary veins cryoballoon isolation (Group 2). The enrollment period will be of 18 months. Randomization will be 1:1 and will be balanced in blocks of varying size. Patients will then be regularly followed up clinically and by long-term ECG recordings.
- Evaluation Criteria: The primary endpoint will be the recurrence of symptomatic or asymptomatic atrial fibrillation, documented by an ECG or an R-test, occurring between M3 and M24
- Number of patients: 170 patients will be enrolled in the study
- Number of centers: Four French and three German centers will participate.
- Perspective: The demonstration of a clinical benefit in terms of atrial fibrillation risk reduction in the patient group with pulmonary vein isolation, could lead to a modification of atrial arrhythmia treatment indication.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 28, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2018
CompletedMay 29, 2018
May 1, 2018
5.8 years
November 28, 2011
May 25, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recurrence of symptomatic or asymptomatic AF as documented on an ECG or a long term Holter
Main endpoint will be the recurrence of symptomatic or asymptomatic atrial fibrillation as documented by an ECG or a R-test. Sustained AF episodes of more than a minute will be classified depending if they are symptomatic or not.
an average of 24 months following the ablation procedure
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Recurrence rate of typical atrial flutter
an average of 24 months following the ablation procedure
Rate of occurrence of atypical flutter
an average of 24 months following the ablation procedure
Rate of occurrence of atrial tachycardia
an average of 24 months following the ablation procedure
Rate of complications related to the ablation procedure
an average of 3 months after the ablation procedure
Rate of major cardiovascular events
an average of 24 months following the ablation procedure
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Atrial flutter ablation
ACTIVE COMPARATORRF atrial flutter ablation
Atrial flutter ablation and pulmonary vein isolation
EXPERIMENTALRF Atrial flutter ablation and pulmonary vein isolation using cryoablation
Interventions
Radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter and pulmonary vein isolation using cryoablation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with a spontaneous flutter or with a flutter recurrence when it was not considered appropriate to use a preventive treatment so far. The flutter may have been paroxysmal or may still be present.
- Patient with at least one documented episode of typical flutter defined as follows: negative F waves in the inferior territory, positive in V1 and negative in V6 lead, F wave pattern with characteristic "saw tooth" appearance and finally a heart rate comprised between 240 and 320 beats per minute.
- Patient with effective anticoagulant therapy for at least 3 weeks.
- Patient with at least one episode of AF (lasting more than 1 minute) documented on an ECG or a 24 hour Holter recording
- Patient who signed an informed consent.
- Patient with age ≥ 18 yo and ≤ 75 yo
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with the following characteristics will be excluded:
- Contraindication to right-heart catheterization
- Contraindication to an anticoagulant treatment
- Patient for which AF is predominant (more recordings of AF than Flutter)
- History of mitral valve surgery
- Known disorders of blood clotting
- Cardiothyreosis
- Life expectancy \< 24 months
- Less than 18 years old and pregnant ladies. As before any ablation, a pregnancy test will be done the day before or the day of the procedure
- Patient less than 18 years old
- Patient under guardianship
- Patient deprived of their liberty by a court decision
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital, Rouenlead
- Medtroniccollaborator
Study Sites (15)
CHU de Brest
Brest, France
CHU Grenoble
Grenoble, 38000, France
CH La Rochelle
La Rochelle, France
AP-HM - Hôpital Nord
Marseille, France
Hôpital Privé de Clairval
Marseille, France
CHU de Nantes
Nantes, France
Nouvelles Cliniques Nantaises
Nantes, France
CHU de Rennes
Rennes, 35033, France
University Hospital of Rouen
Rouen, 76000, France
CHU de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, France
Clinique Pasteur
Toulouse, 31076, France
CHU de Tours
Tours, France
Clinique Saint Gatien
Tours, France
Clinique Saint Joseph
Trélazé, France
Polyclinique Vauban
Valenciennes, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Frederic Anselme, MD
University Hospital, Rouen
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 28, 2011
First Posted
January 31, 2012
Study Start
June 1, 2012
Primary Completion
April 1, 2018
Study Completion
April 1, 2018
Last Updated
May 29, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05