Naltrexone and Memantine Effects on Alcohol Drinking Behaviors
Glutamate-opioid Interactions in Alcohol Drinking Behaviors
2 other identifiers
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the combined effects of the study medications naltrexone and memantine on alcohol drinking behaviors.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jan 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 23, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 26, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 29, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 10, 2019
CompletedMarch 9, 2020
March 1, 2020
5.2 years
January 23, 2012
June 29, 2018
March 5, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Number of Drinks Consumed at Lab Session (Day 7)
Number of drinks consumed during the lab session (Day 7) after taking study medication, ranging from 0-12.
Day 7
Craving AUC: Adlib Drinking Phase
Craving for alcohol based on Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ, Bohn et al., 1995), which is an 8 item measurement of self-reported alcohol urges that has been shown to be strongly related to alcohol dependence severity. Each item is scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), with a higher score indicating higher craving. Assessed multiple times, starting at 50 minutes after priming drink until 230 minutes after priming drink. Higher craving scores (ranging from 0-56) are indicated by larger log-transformed AUC.
50-230 minutes after the priming drink during lab session
Stimulation Response to Alcohol at Lab Session
Brief Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale-Stimulation subscale (BAES; Martin et al., 1993), measuring stimulation effects of alcohol. Seven items ranging from 0 (not at all) to extremely (10) with higher measurements indicating higher stimulation. Assessed multiple times, starting at 50 minutes after priming drink until 230 minutes after priming drink. Higher stimulation scores (ranging from 0-70) are indicated by larger log-transformed AUC.
50-230 minutes after the priming drink during lab session
Sedation Response to Alcohol at Lab Session
Brief Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale-Sedation subscale (BAES; Martin et al., 1993), measuring sedation effects of alcohol. The seven items included on the sedation subscale range from 1 (not at all) to extremely (10) with higher measurements indicating higher sedation. Assessed multiple times, starting at 50 minutes after priming drink until 230 minutes after priming drink. Area Under the Curve was used to calculate the final score reported for the BAES. As a single summary measure, AUC, was calculated for BAES outcomes based on scores recorded at numerous time points throughout the adlib drinking session The calculation was based on the trapezoidal methods using times 50, 90, 110, 150, 170, 210, and 230 . Based on the distribution, each AUC was log-transformed. Higher AUC levels correspond to greater levels of sedation.
50-230 minutes after the priming drink during lab session
Craving AUC: Priming Dose Phase
Craving for alcohol based on Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ, Bohn et al., 1995), which is an 8 item measurement of self-reported alcohol urges that has been shown to be strongly related to alcohol dependence severity. Each item is scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), with a higher score indicating higher craving. Craving for alcohol based on Alcohol Urge Questionnaire is calculated using Area Under the Curve (AUC). A single summary measure, AUC was calculated for AUQ outcomes based on scores recorded at numerous time points throughout the priming drink session. The calculation was based on the trapezoidal methods using times -20, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 minutes before/after priming drink. Based on the distribution, each AUC was log-transformed. Higher AUC levels correspond to greater alcohol urge.
0-50 minutes after the priming drink
Sedation Response to Alcohol: Priming Dose Phase
Brief Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale-Sedation subscale, measuring sedation effects of alcohol with higher measurements indicating higher sedation. Brief Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale-Stimulation subscale (BAES; Martin et al., 1993), measuring stimulation effects of alcohol. Seven items ranging from 0 (not at all) to extremely (10) with higher measurements indicating higher stimulation. The subscale total range is 0-70, these scores are logged transformed.
0-50 minutes after priming drink
Stimulation Response to Alcohol: Priming Dose Phase
Brief Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale-Stimulation subscale, measuring stimulation effects of alcohol with higher measurements indicating higher stimulation. Brief Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale-Stimulation subscale (BAES; Martin et al., 1993), measuring stimulation effects of alcohol. Seven items ranging from 0 (not at all) to extremely (10) with higher measurements indicating higher stimulation. The subscale total range is 0-70, these scores are logged transformed.
0-50 minutes after priming drink
Study Arms (2)
Naltrexone and memantine
EXPERIMENTALTreatment with Naltrexone and memantine first
Naltrexone and Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORTreatment with naltrexone and placebo first
Interventions
Naltrexone 50mg memantine 20mg
Naltrexone 50 mg Placebo
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ages 21-55
- Able to read English at 6th grade level or higher and to complete study evaluations
- Regular alcohol drinker
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals who are seeking alcohol treatment
- Medical conditions that would contraindicate the use of study medication
- Regular use of other substances
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sac, Cmhc
New Haven, Connecticut, 06519, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dana Cavallo, Assistant Professor
- Organization
- Yale University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin, Ph.D.
Yale University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 23, 2012
First Posted
January 26, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 29, 2017
Study Completion
May 1, 2017
Last Updated
March 9, 2020
Results First Posted
July 10, 2019
Record last verified: 2020-03