Hybrid Sirolimus-eluting Versus Everolimus-eluting Stents for Total Coronary Occlusions
PRISON-IV
Hybrid Sirolimus-eluting Stent With Bioresorbable Polymer Versus Everolimus-eluting Stent With Durable Polymer for Total Coronary Occlusions in Native Coronary Arteries (PRISON-IV)
1 other identifier
interventional
330
2 countries
4
Brief Summary
Percutaneous recanalization of total coronary occlusions (TCO) was historically hampered by high rates of restenosis and reocclusion. In the PRISON II and III trial we showed landmark reduction in restenosis with sirolimus-eluting stents (Cypher, Cordis Corporation) compared to conventional bare metal stents in TCO. In the PRISON III trial, we observed similar favourable results with second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent (Resolute, Medtronic Inc.). Another drugs-eluting stent mounted with everolimus (Xience Prime, Abbott) also demonstrated favourable results in TCO. Recently, drug-eluting stents (DES) with bioresorbable polymer coatings were developed, to address safety concerns regarding the observation of very late stent thrombosis, due to hypersensitivity reactions, and chronic inflammation, on the durable polymer coating of DES. However, none of these DES with bioresorbable polymers were evaluated in patients with TCO. The PRISON IV trial is a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multi-center trial, designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and angiographic outcome of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymers (ORSIRO, Biotronik Inc.) compared to everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymers (Xience Prime, Abbott) in patients with successfully recanalized TCOs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 coronary-artery-disease
Started Feb 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_3 coronary-artery-disease
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 25, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2020
CompletedMarch 28, 2017
March 1, 2017
4 years
November 15, 2011
March 27, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
In-segment late luminal loss at 9 months as assessed by an independent angiographic core lab.
9 month
Secondary Outcomes (8)
In-stent late luminal loss
9 month
In-stent and in-segment binary restenosis rate
9 month
In-stent and in-segment minimal lumen diameter
9 month
Percentage diameter stenosis
9 month
A composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, myocardial infarction and clinically driven target lesion revascularization)
9 month
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents
EXPERIMENTALORSIRO, Biotronik Inc.
Everolimus-eluting stents
ACTIVE COMPARATORXIENCE PRIME, Abbott
Interventions
Recanalization of totally occluded coronary arteries
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- the estimated duration of the occlusion is at least 4 weeks.
- signs of ischemia related to the occluded coronary artery.
- successful recanalization of the occluded artery is achieved.
- reference diameter is \> 2.5 mm.
- written informed consent obtained.
You may not qualify if:
- primary or rescue PCI for acute myocardial infarction
- the lesion could not be crossed.
- lesions with complex anatomy making successful stent deployment unlikely.
- the guide wire is not in the true lumen distal to the occlusion.
- Sirolimus or zotarolimus allergy
- venous or arterial bypass grafts
- pregnant or nursing women.
- participation in an other trial.
- factors making long-term follow-up difficult or unlikely.
- life expectancy \< 1 year.
- contraindications for ASA or Clopidogrel or heparin.
- use of coumadins that could not be stopped before the procedure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- R&D Cardiologielead
- Biotronik SE & Co. KGcollaborator
Study Sites (4)
AZ Middelheim
Antwerp, Antwerpen, 2020, Belgium
AMC
Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1105AZ, Netherlands
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, Eindhoven, 5602ZA, Netherlands
St Antonius Hospital
Nieuwegein, 3435CM, Netherlands
Related Publications (16)
Rahel BM, Suttorp MJ, Laarman GJ, Kiemeneij F, Bal ET, Rensing BJ, Ernst SM, ten Berg JM, Kelder JC, Plokker HW. Primary stenting of occluded native coronary arteries: final results of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries (PRISON) study. Am Heart J. 2004 May;147(5):e22. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.11.023.
PMID: 15131557BACKGROUNDSuttorp MJ, Mast EG, Plokker HW, Kelder JC, Ernst SM, Bal ET. Primary coronary stenting after successful balloon angioplasty of chronic total occlusions: a single-center experience. Am Heart J. 1998 Feb;135(2 Pt 1):318-22. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70099-7.
PMID: 9489982BACKGROUNDMoses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, Fitzgerald PJ, Holmes DR, O'Shaughnessy C, Caputo RP, Kereiakes DJ, Williams DO, Teirstein PS, Jaeger JL, Kuntz RE; SIRIUS Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 2;349(14):1315-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035071.
PMID: 14523139BACKGROUNDSirnes PA, Golf S, Myreng Y, Molstad P, Emanuelsson H, Albertsson P, Brekke M, Mangschau A, Endresen K, Kjekshus J. Stenting in Chronic Coronary Occlusion (SICCO): a randomized, controlled trial of adding stent implantation after successful angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Nov 15;28(6):1444-51. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00349-x.
PMID: 8917256BACKGROUNDSuttorp MJ, Laarman GJ, Rahel BM, Kelder JC, Bosschaert MA, Kiemeneij F, Ten Berg JM, Bal ET, Rensing BJ, Eefting FD, Mast EG. Primary Stenting of Totally Occluded Native Coronary Arteries II (PRISON II): a randomized comparison of bare metal stent implantation with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of total coronary occlusions. Circulation. 2006 Aug 29;114(9):921-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.613588. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
PMID: 16908768BACKGROUNDKandzari DE, Leon MB, Popma JJ, Fitzgerald PJ, O'Shaughnessy C, Ball MW, Turco M, Applegate RJ, Gurbel PA, Midei MG, Badre SS, Mauri L, Thompson KP, LeNarz LA, Kuntz RE; ENDEAVOR III Investigators. Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with native coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Dec 19;48(12):2440-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.035. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
PMID: 17174180BACKGROUNDWohrle J, Rottbauer W, Imhof A. Everolimus-eluting stents for treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions. Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Jan;101(1):23-8. doi: 10.1007/s00392-011-0359-3. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
PMID: 21938564BACKGROUNDRahel BM, Laarman GJ, Kelder JC, Ten Berg JM, Suttorp MJ. Three-year clinical outcome after primary stenting of totally occluded native coronary arteries: a randomized comparison of bare-metal stent implantation with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of total coronary occlusions (Primary Stenting of Totally Occluded Native Coronary Arteries [PRISON] II study). Am Heart J. 2009 Jan;157(1):149-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.025. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
PMID: 19081412BACKGROUNDVan den Branden BJ, Rahel BM, Laarman GJ, Slagboom T, Kelder JC, Ten Berg JM, Suttorp MJ. Five-year clinical outcome after primary stenting of totally occluded native coronary arteries: a randomised comparison of bare metal stent implantation with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of total coronary occlusions (PRISON II study). EuroIntervention. 2012 Feb;7(10):1189-96. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I10A190.
PMID: 22030323BACKGROUNDVirmani R, Guagliumi G, Farb A, Musumeci G, Grieco N, Motta T, Mihalcsik L, Tespili M, Valsecchi O, Kolodgie FD. Localized hypersensitivity and late coronary thrombosis secondary to a sirolimus-eluting stent: should we be cautious? Circulation. 2004 Feb 17;109(6):701-5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000116202.41966.D4. Epub 2004 Jan 26.
PMID: 14744976BACKGROUNDVirmani R, Liistro F, Stankovic G, Di Mario C, Montorfano M, Farb A, Kolodgie FD, Colombo A. Mechanism of late in-stent restenosis after implantation of a paclitaxel derivate-eluting polymer stent system in humans. Circulation. 2002 Nov 19;106(21):2649-51. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000041632.02514.14.
PMID: 12438288BACKGROUNDCook S, Ladich E, Nakazawa G, Eshtehardi P, Neidhart M, Vogel R, Togni M, Wenaweser P, Billinger M, Seiler C, Gay S, Meier B, Pichler WJ, Juni P, Virmani R, Windecker S. Correlation of intravascular ultrasound findings with histopathological analysis of thrombus aspirates in patients with very late drug-eluting stent thrombosis. Circulation. 2009 Aug 4;120(5):391-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.854398. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
PMID: 19620501BACKGROUNDStefanini GG, Kalesan B, Serruys PW, Heg D, Buszman P, Linke A, Ischinger T, Klauss V, Eberli F, Wijns W, Morice MC, Di Mario C, Corti R, Antoni D, Sohn HY, Eerdmans P, van Es GA, Meier B, Windecker S, Juni P. Long-term clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease (LEADERS): 4 year follow-up of a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2011 Dec 3;378(9807):1940-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61672-3. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
PMID: 22075451BACKGROUNDUghi GJ, Adriaenssens T, Onsea K, Kayaert P, Dubois C, Sinnaeve P, Coosemans M, Desmet W, D'hooge J. Automatic segmentation of in-vivo intra-coronary optical coherence tomography images to assess stent strut apposition and coverage. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Feb;28(2):229-41. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9824-3. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
PMID: 21347593BACKGROUNDMoreno R, Garcia E, Teles RC, Almeida MS, Carvalho HC, Sabate M, Martin-Reyes R, Rumoroso JR, Galeote G, Goicolea FJ, Moreu J, Mainar V, Mauri J, Ferreira R, Valdes M, Perez de Prado A, Martin-Yuste V, Jimenez-Valero S, Sanchez-Recalde A, Calvo L, Lopez de Sa E, Macaya C, Lopez-Sendon JL. A randomised comparison between everolimus-eluting stent and sirolimus-eluting stent in chronic coronary total occlusions. Rationale and design of the CIBELES (non-acute Coronary occlusion treated by EveroLimus-Eluting Stent) trial. EuroIntervention. 2010 May;6(1):112-6.
PMID: 20542806BACKGROUNDTeeuwen K, Adriaenssens T, Van den Branden BJ, Henriques JP, Van der Schaaf RJ, Koolen JJ, Vermeersch PH, Bosschaert MA, Tijssen JG, Suttorp MJ. A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study. Trials. 2012 Dec 15;13:240. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-240.
PMID: 23241457DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maarten J. Suttorp, MD, PhD
St. Antonius Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2011
First Posted
January 25, 2012
Study Start
February 1, 2012
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2020
Last Updated
March 28, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03