NCT01512342

Brief Summary

Given the lack of evidence in support of pacing self-management for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), it is examined whether physical behavior and health status of patients with CFS improve in response to a pacing self-management program. The effects of pacing will be compared with those observed when applying relaxation therapy to patients with CFS.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
33

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2011

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2011

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 10, 2012

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 19, 2012

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

December 17, 2015

Status Verified

December 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

January 10, 2012

Last Update Submit

December 16, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

pacingactivity managementrelaxationphysiotherapyoccupational therapyautonomic nervous system

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • the change in score on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)

    well-validated, reliable and frequently used outcome measure semi-structered interview

    measured at baseline (week 1) and post-treatment (week 5)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • the change in subscale scores on the Medical Outcomes Short Form 37 Health Status Survey (SF-36)

    measured at baseline (week 1) and post-treatment (week 5)

  • the change in Ckecklist Individual Strength (CIS)

    measured at baseline (week 1) and post-treatment (week 5)

  • the change in CFS Symptom List

    measured at baseline (week 1) and post-treatment (week 5)

  • the change in autonomic activity at rest and following 3 activities of daily living

    measured at baseline (week 1) and post-treatment (week 5)

Study Arms (2)

Pacing

EXPERIMENTAL

The pacing self-management program focussed on teaching the patient to estimate their current physical capabilities prior to commencing an activity. In order to appropriately pace activities (daily activities and exercise bouts), CFS patients were learned to estimate their current physical capabilities prior to commencing an activity, keeping in mind the regular fluctuating nature of their symptoms. The activity duration used within the program was less than that reported by the patient so to account for typical overestimations made by the patient. Each activity block was interspersed with breaks, with the length of this break equating to the duration of the activity.

Behavioral: Pacing

relaxation therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Relaxation therapy comprised of education about the role of stress in CFS biology, and the opportunities stress management provides to handle this issue. Patients were then taught how to apply stress management techniques like Jacobson relaxation skills, Schultz relaxation skills, visualization, etc.

Behavioral: relaxation therapy

Interventions

PacingBEHAVIORAL

3 one-on-one sessions weekly for 3 consecutive weeks

Also known as: activity self-management, activity management, adaptive pacing
Pacing

3 one-on-one sessions weekly for 3 consecutive weeks

Also known as: stress managament, Jacobson relaxation, visualisation, Schultz relaxation
relaxation therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • adult
  • age range between 18 and 65 years of age
  • female gender
  • willing to sign informed consent form
  • fulfilling the 1994 Centre for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital Antwerp

Antwerp, B-2650, Belgium

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Nijs J, van Eupen I, Vandecauter J, Augustinus E, Bleyen G, Moorkens G, Meeus M. Can pacing self-management alter physical behavior and symptom severity in chronic fatigue syndrome? A case series. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(7):985-96. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.01.0007.

    PMID: 20104421BACKGROUND
  • Nijs J, Paul L, Wallman K. Chronic fatigue syndrome: an approach combining self-management with graded exercise to avoid exacerbations. J Rehabil Med. 2008 Apr;40(4):241-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0185.

    PMID: 18382818BACKGROUND
  • Meeus M, van Eupen I, van Baarle E, De Boeck V, Luyckx A, Kos D, Nijs J. Symptom fluctuations and daily physical activity in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: a case-control study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Nov;92(11):1820-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.023.

    PMID: 22032215BACKGROUND
  • Larun L, Brurberg KG, Odgaard-Jensen J, Price JR. Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 19;12(12):CD003200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003200.pub9.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic

Interventions

Relaxation Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesEncephalomyelitisNeuroinflammatory DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mind-Body TherapiesComplementary TherapiesTherapeuticsBehavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Study Officials

  • Daphne Kos, PhD

    Artesis University College Antwerp, Belgium

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2012

First Posted

January 19, 2012

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion

June 1, 2014

Study Completion

August 1, 2014

Last Updated

December 17, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-12

Locations