Pacing Activity Self-management for Patients With Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
2 other identifiers
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Given the lack of evidence in support of pacing self-management for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), it is examined whether physical behavior and health status of patients with CFS improve in response to a pacing self-management program. The effects of pacing will be compared with those observed when applying relaxation therapy to patients with CFS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Aug 2011
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 19, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2014
CompletedDecember 17, 2015
December 1, 2015
2.8 years
January 10, 2012
December 16, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the change in score on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
well-validated, reliable and frequently used outcome measure semi-structered interview
measured at baseline (week 1) and post-treatment (week 5)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
the change in subscale scores on the Medical Outcomes Short Form 37 Health Status Survey (SF-36)
measured at baseline (week 1) and post-treatment (week 5)
the change in Ckecklist Individual Strength (CIS)
measured at baseline (week 1) and post-treatment (week 5)
the change in CFS Symptom List
measured at baseline (week 1) and post-treatment (week 5)
the change in autonomic activity at rest and following 3 activities of daily living
measured at baseline (week 1) and post-treatment (week 5)
Study Arms (2)
Pacing
EXPERIMENTALThe pacing self-management program focussed on teaching the patient to estimate their current physical capabilities prior to commencing an activity. In order to appropriately pace activities (daily activities and exercise bouts), CFS patients were learned to estimate their current physical capabilities prior to commencing an activity, keeping in mind the regular fluctuating nature of their symptoms. The activity duration used within the program was less than that reported by the patient so to account for typical overestimations made by the patient. Each activity block was interspersed with breaks, with the length of this break equating to the duration of the activity.
relaxation therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORRelaxation therapy comprised of education about the role of stress in CFS biology, and the opportunities stress management provides to handle this issue. Patients were then taught how to apply stress management techniques like Jacobson relaxation skills, Schultz relaxation skills, visualization, etc.
Interventions
3 one-on-one sessions weekly for 3 consecutive weeks
3 one-on-one sessions weekly for 3 consecutive weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adult
- age range between 18 and 65 years of age
- female gender
- willing to sign informed consent form
- fulfilling the 1994 Centre for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Vrije Universiteit Brussellead
- Artesis University College, Antwerpcollaborator
- Universiteit Antwerpencollaborator
- University Hospital, Antwerpcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Antwerp
Antwerp, B-2650, Belgium
Related Publications (4)
Nijs J, van Eupen I, Vandecauter J, Augustinus E, Bleyen G, Moorkens G, Meeus M. Can pacing self-management alter physical behavior and symptom severity in chronic fatigue syndrome? A case series. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(7):985-96. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.01.0007.
PMID: 20104421BACKGROUNDNijs J, Paul L, Wallman K. Chronic fatigue syndrome: an approach combining self-management with graded exercise to avoid exacerbations. J Rehabil Med. 2008 Apr;40(4):241-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0185.
PMID: 18382818BACKGROUNDMeeus M, van Eupen I, van Baarle E, De Boeck V, Luyckx A, Kos D, Nijs J. Symptom fluctuations and daily physical activity in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: a case-control study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Nov;92(11):1820-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.023.
PMID: 22032215BACKGROUNDLarun L, Brurberg KG, Odgaard-Jensen J, Price JR. Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 19;12(12):CD003200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003200.pub9.
PMID: 39697147DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Daphne Kos, PhD
Artesis University College Antwerp, Belgium
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2012
First Posted
January 19, 2012
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
December 17, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-12