Lidocaine Spray Compared With Submucosal Injection During LEEP: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
101
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) is a widely used minor surgical procedure for diagnosis and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. During the procedure, several methods have been proposed to reducing pain including submucosal block, paracervical block, and oral analgesics. Submucosal (underneath the lining of the cervix) injection of lidocaine appeared to be the most common methods used. However, from the investigators experience, there is significant pain associated with the injection itself. Lidocaine spray is an effective measure for pain control during minor gastrointestinal and otolaryngological procedures. It is simple without pain related to application. An objective of this study is to examine effectiveness of lidocaine spray versus lidocaine submucosal injection by comparing pain scores at various stages of the LEEP procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Sep 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 5, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 9, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedJanuary 15, 2013
January 1, 2013
1.3 years
January 5, 2012
January 13, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual analog pain scores immediately after the excision
Immediately after the excision
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Visual analog pain scores at the time of anesthetic application
At the time of anesthetic application
Visual analog pain scores at 30 minutes after the procedure
At 30 minutes after the procedure
Study Arms (2)
Lidocaine spray
EXPERIMENTAL10% lidocaine spray 40 mg applied directly to the cervix, 3 minutes before starting cervical excision
Lidocaine submucosal injection
ACTIVE COMPARATOR2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline 2 ml injected submucosally to the four quadrant of the cervix, 3 minutes before starting cervical excision
Interventions
10% lidocaine spray 40 mg applied directly to the cervix, 3 minutes before starting cervical excision
2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline 2 ml injected submucosally into the four quadrant of the cervix, 3 minutes before starting cervical excision
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Any degrees of cervical dysplasia detected from cervical cytology or histology
- Need to have loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for diagnosis and/or treatment
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to lidocaine
- Pregnancy
- Previous history of cervical operation including conization, LEEP, laser therapy and cryotherapy
- Cardiac arrhythmia
- Neural disease with impaired sensation
- Lower urinary tract cancer
- Coagulation defect
- Drug dependence
- Lower genital tract infection
- Obvious invasive disease of the cervix
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of OB-GYN, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
Related Publications (1)
Vanichtantikul A, Charoenkwan K. Lidocaine spray compared with submucosal injection for reducing pain during loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep;122(3):553-7. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829d888e.
PMID: 23921860DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kittipat Charoenkwan, M.D.
Chiang Mai University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Asama Vanichtantikul, M.D.
Chiang Mai University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 5, 2012
First Posted
January 9, 2012
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
January 15, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-01