Study Stopped
It was not possible to enroll patients into the study in a realistic timeframe.
Sonalleve Fibroid Ablation Pivotal Clinical Trial for MR-HIFU of Uterine Fibroids
SOFIA
Philips Pivotal Clinical Trial for MRI-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Uterine Fibroids
2 other identifiers
interventional
49
3 countries
9
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical study is to determine whether treatment with the Philips Sonalleve Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU) system is effective in the treatment symptomatic uterine leiomyomas (uterine fibroids).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started May 2012
Typical duration for phase_2
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedApril 5, 2017
April 1, 2017
3.8 years
January 3, 2012
April 3, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Alternative Interventional Treatment (AIT)
AIT is scored dichotomously as follows: 0 = Failure. Failure occurs if an AIT for fibroid related symptoms is administered within 12 months of study treatment. 1 = Success. Success occurs if no AIT is administered for fibroid related symptoms within 12 months of study treatment. An AIT is defined as being one of the following: hysterectomy, myomectomy, uterine artery embolization, endometrial ablation and resection, or another MR-HIFU treatment (with the exception of a 're-treatment' as defined in the protocol, e.g. because of temporarily inaccessible fibroids).
12 months after HIFU treatment
Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL)
Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) scored dichotomously as follows: 0 = Failure. Failure occurs if the change from baseline in MBL measurement is \< 50 % as measured with alkaline hematin test (AHT) method. 1 = Success. Success occurs if the change from baseline in MBL measurement is \>= 50 %, or if the MBL is \< 80 ml as measured with the AHT method.
at baseline and at 12 months following treatment
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Return to Activity
72 hours
Symptom Severity Score (SSS)
at baseline and at 12 months following treatment
Study Arms (2)
MR-HIFU treatment
EXPERIMENTALPatients receiving MR-HIFU treatment
Sham Treatment
SHAM COMPARATORPatients receiving sham treatment
Interventions
A treatment session with the Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU device for thermal ablation of uterine fibroids with high-intensity focused ultrasound.
A pretend treatment session with the Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU system in which no therapeutic ultrasound doses are delivered.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women, age between 18 and 50 years
- Ethnicity has a match with the intended profile for the site
- Weight \< 140kg or 310lbs
- Pre- or peri-menopausal as indicated by clinical evaluation or Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) level \< 40 IU/L
- Willing and able to attend all study visits
- Willing and able to complete Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) assessment with Alkaline Hematin (AH) method
- Willing and able to use reliable contraception methods
- Uterine size \< 24 weeks
- Cervical cell assessment by Pap smear: Normal, Low Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (SIL), Low risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) or Atypical Squamous Cells of Uncertain Significance (ASCUS) subtypes of cervical tissue
- MR-HIFU device accessibility to fibroids such that at least 50% of the total fibroid volume can be treated.
- Fibroids selected for treatment meeting the following criteria (further extrapolated in the protocol):
- Total planned ablation volume of all fibroids should not exceed 250 ml and
- No more than 5 fibroids should be planned for ablation and
- Dominant fibroid (diameter) is greater than or equal to 3 cm and
- Completely non-enhancing fibroids should not be treated as the identification of treated volume becomes ambiguous
- +2 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Other Pelvic Disease (Other mass, endometriosis, ovarian tumor, acute pelvic disease, significant adenomyosis)
- Desire for future pregnancy
- Significant systemic disease even if controlled
- Positive pregnancy test
- Hematocrit \< 25%
- Extensive scarring along anterior lower abdominal wall (\>50% of area)
- Surgical clips in the potential path of the HIFU beam
- MRI contraindicated
- MRI contrast agent contraindicated (including renal insufficiency)
- Calcifications around or throughout uterine tissues that may affect treatment
- Communication barrier
- Highly perfused or brighter than myometrium in T2-weighted MRI (according to the T2 contrast obtained using the Philips MR-HIFU MR protocol) fibroids
- Fibroids not quantifiable on MRI (e.g. multi-fibroid cases where volume measurements are not feasible)
- Menses lasting \> 7 days or intermenstrual bleeding (patient can be included if there is endometrial biopsy within 6 months to exclude malignancy)
- Patient is currently on hormonal medication for fibroids or has a hormonal medication history as described below:
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (9)
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467, United States
Oregon Science and Health University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Vanderbilt Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75235, United States
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
Related Publications (14)
Voogt MJ, Trillaud H, Kim YS, Mali WP, Barkhausen J, Bartels LW, Deckers R, Frulio N, Rhim H, Lim HK, Eckey T, Nieminen HJ, Mougenot C, Keserci B, Soini J, Vaara T, Kohler MO, Sokka S, van den Bosch MA. Volumetric feedback ablation of uterine fibroids using magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound therapy. Eur Radiol. 2012 Feb;22(2):411-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2262-8. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
PMID: 21901565BACKGROUNDSpies JB, Coyne K, Guaou Guaou N, Boyle D, Skyrnarz-Murphy K, Gonzalves SM. The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):290-300. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01702-1.
PMID: 11814511BACKGROUNDStewart EA, Gedroyc WM, Tempany CM, Quade BJ, Inbar Y, Ehrenstein T, Shushan A, Hindley JT, Goldin RD, David M, Sklair M, Rabinovici J. Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):48-54. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.345.
PMID: 12861137BACKGROUNDHindley J, Gedroyc WM, Regan L, Stewart E, Tempany C, Hynyen K, Mcdannold N, Inbar Y, Itzchak Y, Rabinovici J, Kim HS, Geschwind JF, Hesley G, Gostout B, Ehrenstein T, Hengst S, Sklair-Levy M, Shushan A, Jolesz F. MRI guidance of focused ultrasound therapy of uterine fibroids: early results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Dec;183(6):1713-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831713.
PMID: 15547216BACKGROUNDLeon-Villapalos J, Kaniorou-Larai M, Dziewulski P. Full thickness abdominal burn following magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound therapy. Burns. 2005 Dec;31(8):1054-5. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.04.019. Epub 2005 Jun 20. No abstract available.
PMID: 15970389BACKGROUNDFennessy FM, Tempany CM. MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery of uterine leiomyomas. Acad Radiol. 2005 Sep;12(9):1158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.05.018.
PMID: 16099686BACKGROUNDStewart EA, Rabinovici J, Tempany CM, Inbar Y, Regan L, Gostout B, Hesley G, Kim HS, Hengst S, Gedroyc WM. Clinical outcomes of focused ultrasound surgery for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril. 2006 Jan;85(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.072.
PMID: 16412721BACKGROUNDFennessy FM, Tempany CM, McDannold NJ, So MJ, Hesley G, Gostout B, Kim HS, Holland GA, Sarti DA, Hynynen K, Jolesz FA, Stewart EA. Uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery--results of different treatment protocols. Radiology. 2007 Jun;243(3):885-93. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2433060267. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
PMID: 17446521BACKGROUNDMara M, Fucikova Z, Maskova J, Kuzel D, Haakova L. Uterine fibroid embolization versus myomectomy in women wishing to preserve fertility: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Jun 1;126(2):226-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.10.008. Epub 2005 Nov 15.
PMID: 16293363BACKGROUNDStewart EA, Gostout B, Rabinovici J, Kim HS, Regan L, Tempany CM. Sustained relief of leiomyoma symptoms by using focused ultrasound surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;110(2 Pt 1):279-87. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000275283.39475.f6.
PMID: 17666601BACKGROUNDTaran FA, Tempany CM, Regan L, Inbar Y, Revel A, Stewart EA; MRgFUS Group. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) compared with abdominal hysterectomy for treatment of uterine leiomyomas. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;34(5):572-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.7435.
PMID: 19852046BACKGROUNDFunaki K, Fukunishi H, Sawada K. Clinical outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine myomas: 24-month follow-up. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;34(5):584-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.7455.
PMID: 19852041BACKGROUNDOkada A, Morita Y, Fukunishi H, Takeichi K, Murakami T. Non-invasive magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroids in a large Japanese population: impact of the learning curve on patient outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;34(5):579-83. doi: 10.1002/uog.7454.
PMID: 19852042BACKGROUNDKim YS, Lim HK, Kim JH, Rhim H, Park BK, Keserci B, Kohler MO, Bae DS, Kim BG, Lee JW, Kim TJ, Sokka S, Lee JH. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging predicts immediate therapeutic response of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Invest Radiol. 2011 Oct;46(10):639-47. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318220785c.
PMID: 21654495BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John H Fischer II, MD
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert K Zurawin, MD
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elizabeth David, MD
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hyo Keun Lim, MD
Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aytekin Oto, MD
University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amanda Yunker, D.O.
Vanderbilt Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter Liu, M.D.
University of Michigan
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rajiv Chopra, PhD
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2012
First Posted
January 5, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 5, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04