NCT01504308

Brief Summary

The purpose of this clinical study is to determine whether treatment with the Philips Sonalleve Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU) system is effective in the treatment symptomatic uterine leiomyomas (uterine fibroids).

Trial Health

60
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
49

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2012

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
3 countries

9 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 3, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 5, 2012

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2012

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

April 5, 2017

Status Verified

April 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

January 3, 2012

Last Update Submit

April 3, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

uterine fibroidsuterine leiomyomasmagnetic resonance imagingfocused ultrasound

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Alternative Interventional Treatment (AIT)

    AIT is scored dichotomously as follows: 0 = Failure. Failure occurs if an AIT for fibroid related symptoms is administered within 12 months of study treatment. 1 = Success. Success occurs if no AIT is administered for fibroid related symptoms within 12 months of study treatment. An AIT is defined as being one of the following: hysterectomy, myomectomy, uterine artery embolization, endometrial ablation and resection, or another MR-HIFU treatment (with the exception of a 're-treatment' as defined in the protocol, e.g. because of temporarily inaccessible fibroids).

    12 months after HIFU treatment

  • Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL)

    Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) scored dichotomously as follows: 0 = Failure. Failure occurs if the change from baseline in MBL measurement is \< 50 % as measured with alkaline hematin test (AHT) method. 1 = Success. Success occurs if the change from baseline in MBL measurement is \>= 50 %, or if the MBL is \< 80 ml as measured with the AHT method.

    at baseline and at 12 months following treatment

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Return to Activity

    72 hours

  • Symptom Severity Score (SSS)

    at baseline and at 12 months following treatment

Study Arms (2)

MR-HIFU treatment

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients receiving MR-HIFU treatment

Device: MR-HIFU treatment

Sham Treatment

SHAM COMPARATOR

Patients receiving sham treatment

Device: Sham treatment

Interventions

A treatment session with the Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU device for thermal ablation of uterine fibroids with high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Also known as: Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU Uterine Fibroid Therapy
MR-HIFU treatment

A pretend treatment session with the Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU system in which no therapeutic ultrasound doses are delivered.

Also known as: pretend treatment with Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU
Sham Treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Women, age between 18 and 50 years
  • Ethnicity has a match with the intended profile for the site
  • Weight \< 140kg or 310lbs
  • Pre- or peri-menopausal as indicated by clinical evaluation or Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) level \< 40 IU/L
  • Willing and able to attend all study visits
  • Willing and able to complete Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) assessment with Alkaline Hematin (AH) method
  • Willing and able to use reliable contraception methods
  • Uterine size \< 24 weeks
  • Cervical cell assessment by Pap smear: Normal, Low Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (SIL), Low risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) or Atypical Squamous Cells of Uncertain Significance (ASCUS) subtypes of cervical tissue
  • MR-HIFU device accessibility to fibroids such that at least 50% of the total fibroid volume can be treated.
  • Fibroids selected for treatment meeting the following criteria (further extrapolated in the protocol):
  • Total planned ablation volume of all fibroids should not exceed 250 ml and
  • No more than 5 fibroids should be planned for ablation and
  • Dominant fibroid (diameter) is greater than or equal to 3 cm and
  • Completely non-enhancing fibroids should not be treated as the identification of treated volume becomes ambiguous
  • +2 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Other Pelvic Disease (Other mass, endometriosis, ovarian tumor, acute pelvic disease, significant adenomyosis)
  • Desire for future pregnancy
  • Significant systemic disease even if controlled
  • Positive pregnancy test
  • Hematocrit \< 25%
  • Extensive scarring along anterior lower abdominal wall (\>50% of area)
  • Surgical clips in the potential path of the HIFU beam
  • MRI contraindicated
  • MRI contrast agent contraindicated (including renal insufficiency)
  • Calcifications around or throughout uterine tissues that may affect treatment
  • Communication barrier
  • Highly perfused or brighter than myometrium in T2-weighted MRI (according to the T2 contrast obtained using the Philips MR-HIFU MR protocol) fibroids
  • Fibroids not quantifiable on MRI (e.g. multi-fibroid cases where volume measurements are not feasible)
  • Menses lasting \> 7 days or intermenstrual bleeding (patient can be included if there is endometrial biopsy within 6 months to exclude malignancy)
  • Patient is currently on hormonal medication for fibroids or has a hormonal medication history as described below:
  • +3 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (9)

University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States

Location

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States

Location

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, 10467, United States

Location

Oregon Science and Health University

Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States

Location

Vanderbilt Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States

Location

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, 75235, United States

Location

St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

Samsung Medical Center

Seoul, South Korea

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Voogt MJ, Trillaud H, Kim YS, Mali WP, Barkhausen J, Bartels LW, Deckers R, Frulio N, Rhim H, Lim HK, Eckey T, Nieminen HJ, Mougenot C, Keserci B, Soini J, Vaara T, Kohler MO, Sokka S, van den Bosch MA. Volumetric feedback ablation of uterine fibroids using magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound therapy. Eur Radiol. 2012 Feb;22(2):411-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2262-8. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

    PMID: 21901565BACKGROUND
  • Spies JB, Coyne K, Guaou Guaou N, Boyle D, Skyrnarz-Murphy K, Gonzalves SM. The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):290-300. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01702-1.

    PMID: 11814511BACKGROUND
  • Stewart EA, Gedroyc WM, Tempany CM, Quade BJ, Inbar Y, Ehrenstein T, Shushan A, Hindley JT, Goldin RD, David M, Sklair M, Rabinovici J. Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):48-54. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.345.

    PMID: 12861137BACKGROUND
  • Hindley J, Gedroyc WM, Regan L, Stewart E, Tempany C, Hynyen K, Mcdannold N, Inbar Y, Itzchak Y, Rabinovici J, Kim HS, Geschwind JF, Hesley G, Gostout B, Ehrenstein T, Hengst S, Sklair-Levy M, Shushan A, Jolesz F. MRI guidance of focused ultrasound therapy of uterine fibroids: early results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Dec;183(6):1713-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831713.

    PMID: 15547216BACKGROUND
  • Leon-Villapalos J, Kaniorou-Larai M, Dziewulski P. Full thickness abdominal burn following magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound therapy. Burns. 2005 Dec;31(8):1054-5. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.04.019. Epub 2005 Jun 20. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15970389BACKGROUND
  • Fennessy FM, Tempany CM. MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery of uterine leiomyomas. Acad Radiol. 2005 Sep;12(9):1158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.05.018.

    PMID: 16099686BACKGROUND
  • Stewart EA, Rabinovici J, Tempany CM, Inbar Y, Regan L, Gostout B, Hesley G, Kim HS, Hengst S, Gedroyc WM. Clinical outcomes of focused ultrasound surgery for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril. 2006 Jan;85(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.072.

    PMID: 16412721BACKGROUND
  • Fennessy FM, Tempany CM, McDannold NJ, So MJ, Hesley G, Gostout B, Kim HS, Holland GA, Sarti DA, Hynynen K, Jolesz FA, Stewart EA. Uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery--results of different treatment protocols. Radiology. 2007 Jun;243(3):885-93. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2433060267. Epub 2007 Apr 19.

    PMID: 17446521BACKGROUND
  • Mara M, Fucikova Z, Maskova J, Kuzel D, Haakova L. Uterine fibroid embolization versus myomectomy in women wishing to preserve fertility: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Jun 1;126(2):226-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.10.008. Epub 2005 Nov 15.

    PMID: 16293363BACKGROUND
  • Stewart EA, Gostout B, Rabinovici J, Kim HS, Regan L, Tempany CM. Sustained relief of leiomyoma symptoms by using focused ultrasound surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;110(2 Pt 1):279-87. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000275283.39475.f6.

    PMID: 17666601BACKGROUND
  • Taran FA, Tempany CM, Regan L, Inbar Y, Revel A, Stewart EA; MRgFUS Group. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) compared with abdominal hysterectomy for treatment of uterine leiomyomas. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;34(5):572-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.7435.

    PMID: 19852046BACKGROUND
  • Funaki K, Fukunishi H, Sawada K. Clinical outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine myomas: 24-month follow-up. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;34(5):584-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.7455.

    PMID: 19852041BACKGROUND
  • Okada A, Morita Y, Fukunishi H, Takeichi K, Murakami T. Non-invasive magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroids in a large Japanese population: impact of the learning curve on patient outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;34(5):579-83. doi: 10.1002/uog.7454.

    PMID: 19852042BACKGROUND
  • Kim YS, Lim HK, Kim JH, Rhim H, Park BK, Keserci B, Kohler MO, Bae DS, Kim BG, Lee JW, Kim TJ, Sokka S, Lee JH. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging predicts immediate therapeutic response of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Invest Radiol. 2011 Oct;46(10):639-47. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318220785c.

    PMID: 21654495BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

LeiomyomaMyofibroma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms, Muscle TissueNeoplasms, Connective and Soft TissueNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsNeoplasms, Connective TissueConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • John H Fischer II, MD

    St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Robert K Zurawin, MD

    St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Elizabeth David, MD

    Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Hyo Keun Lim, MD

    Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Aytekin Oto, MD

    University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Amanda Yunker, D.O.

    Vanderbilt Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Peter Liu, M.D.

    University of Michigan

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Rajiv Chopra, PhD

    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2012

First Posted

January 5, 2012

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion

March 1, 2016

Study Completion

March 1, 2016

Last Updated

April 5, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-04

Locations