Evaluation of Accelerometer-Based Neuromuscular Monitoring Reliability to Exclude Postoperative Residual Paralysis
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Accelerometer-based neuromuscular monitoring is not the gold-standard method to evaluate residual postoperative paralysis but it represents the most simple, inexpensive and widespread tool in clinical practice. Train-of-four ratio (TOF-ratio) of 100% is considered the gold-standard to avoid PORC (post operative residual curarization). This clinical trial is conducted to verify the reliability of accelerometer-based neuromuscular monitoring in order to exclude postoperative residual paralysis which is not highlighted by this instrument at a TOF-ratio=100%. The study evaluates patients' neuromuscular recovery evaluated using pulmonary function tests after extubation at a TOFratio=100%. Administering placebo or sugammadex at a TOF ratio=100% allows to evaluate whether the recovery of muscle function is concrete, although the monitoring device shows a complete decurarization; patients treated with sugammadex should not be capable to perform better pulmonary function tests if a TOF ratio=100% is reliable.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2011
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 29, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 4, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2012
CompletedApril 22, 2014
April 1, 2014
6 months
December 29, 2011
April 20, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) changes after placebo or sugammadex
10 minutes after surgery and 5 minutes later (after placebo or sugammadex administration)
10 minutes after surgery and 5 minutes later
Maximum Expiratory Pressure (MEP) changes after placebo or sugammadex
10 minutes after surgery and 5 minutes later (after placebo or sugammadex administration)
10 minutes after surgery and 5 minutes later
Forced Expiratory Volume after the first second (FEV1) changes after placebo or sugammadex
10 minutes after surgery and 5 minutes later (after placebo or sugammadex administration)
10 minutes after surgery and 5 minutes later
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) changes after placebo or sugammadex
10 minutes after surgery and 5 minutes later (after placebo or sugammadex administration)
10 minutes after surgery and 5 minutes later
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Ratio of Maximum Expiratory Flow and Maximum Inspiratory Flow rate at 50% of vital capacity (MEF50/MIF50) changes after placebo or sugammadex
10 minutes after surgery and 5 minutes later
Hemogasanalysis parameters changes after placebo or sugammadex
10 minutes after surgery and 5 minutes later
Swallow ability changes after placebo or sugammadex
10 minutes after surgery and 5 minutes later
Study Arms (2)
Sugammadex
ACTIVE COMPARATORSodium chloride solution
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
sugammadex 10 mg/ml diluted solution dosage: 1mg/kg i.v. (0,1 ml/kg)
Sodium chloride solution 0,9% dosage: 0,1 ml/kg i.v.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients undergoing major abdominal surgery
- age between 18 and 70 years
- ASA class 1 or 2
- patients scheduled for blended anesthesia (epidural + general anesthesia)
- patients capable to perform pulmonary function tests (preoperative values of MIP, MEP, FEV1% and FEV1/FVC in normal ranges).
You may not qualify if:
- known or suspected respiratory, cardiovascular or neuromuscular disease
- renal or hepatic failure
- known or suspected allergies to drugs used in the study
- risk for malignant hyperthermia
- pregnancy
- diagnosed depressive disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
Milan, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Piccioni F, Mariani L, Bogno L, Rivetti I, Tramontano GT, Carbonara M, Ammatuna M, Langer M. An acceleromyographic train-of-four ratio of 1.0 reliably excludes respiratory muscle weakness after major abdominal surgery: a randomized double-blind study. Can J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;61(7):641-9. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0160-7. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
PMID: 24740312RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Federico Piccioni, MD
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori - Milan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 29, 2011
First Posted
January 4, 2012
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2012
Study Completion
July 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 22, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-04