Bronchodilator Response in 4-12 Years Chinese Controller Naive Asthmatic Children
A Prospective Observational Study in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital in Beijing to Understand the Accuracy of Bronchodilator Response (BDR) in Chinese Controller Naive Asthmatic Children Between the Age of 4~12 Years Old
1 other identifier
observational
587
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objectives:
- 1.To observe BDR distribution curve for Chinese non-asthmatic and controller-naïve asthmatic children from 4-12 years respectively
- 2.To compare BDR values between non-asthmatic group and controller-naïve asthmatic group, and analyze appropriate cut-off point value
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Dec 2011
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 23, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 28, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 28, 2021
CompletedSeptember 28, 2021
September 1, 2021
2.1 years
December 23, 2011
November 27, 2015
September 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bronchodilator Response in Asthmatic Children
1. To observe bronchodilator response(BDR) distribution curve for Chinese non-asthmatic children from 4-12 years, BDR calculated as: (FEV 1 L post-bronchodilator - FEV 1 L pre-bronchodilator)/FEV 1 L pre-bronchodilator × 100%. 2. To observe BDR distribution curve for Chinese controller-naïve asthmatic children from 4-12 years 3. To compare BDR values between non-asthmatic group and controller-naïve asthmatic group, and analyze appropriate cut-off point value
3 years
Study Arms (2)
asthmatic children
children diagnosed by a specialist as asthmatic patients
non-asthmatic children
children who are healthy and who do not have respiratory syndrom
Eligibility Criteria
300 asthmatic children and 300 non-asthmatic children will be recruited
You may qualify if:
- Willingly attend this investigation
- Chest physical tests are normal
You may not qualify if:
- The child had been hospitalized for any severe respiratory condition
- A physician had ever stated that the child had asthma, reactive airway diseases, or the child had taken antiasthma medications for symptoms
- The child was diagnosed with congenital heart disease requiring surgery or medications for management
- There are positive responses concerning other serious chest problems, chest surgery, chronic productive cough, recurrent intractable wheezing, and shortness of breath
- The children can not finish the test that met American Thoracic Society criteria for preschool children in a maximum of 6 attempts and are unable to successfully complete post-bronchodilator (BD) spirometry
- Asthmatic group: 4-12 years old asthmatic children will be recruited from the asthma clinic of the Capital Institute of Pediatrics
- Asymptomatic or mild symptomatic with no physical signs of wheeze at the time of testing
- Not receiving controller medication 6 weeks prior to the initial evaluation
- Willing to attend this investigation
- Using short β2 agonists within 6 hours
- Using long acting β2 agonists within 24 hours
- Can not finish the test that met American Thoracic Society criteria for preschool children in a maximum of 6 attempts and are unable to successfully complete post-bronchodilator spirometry.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Chinalead
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Capital Institute of Pediatrics
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Related Publications (10)
Bacharier LB, Strunk RC, Mauger D, White D, Lemanske RF Jr, Sorkness CA. Classifying asthma severity in children: mismatch between symptoms, medication use, and lung function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Aug 15;170(4):426-32. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200308-1178OC. Epub 2004 Jun 1.
PMID: 15172893RESULTKumar R, Wang B, Wang X, Chen C, Yang J, Fu L, Xu X. Bronchodilator responses in Chinese children from asthma index families and the general population. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Jun;117(6):1257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.02.049.
PMID: 16750984RESULTGalant SP, Morphew T, Amaro S, Liao O. Value of the bronchodilator response in assessing controller naive asthmatic children. J Pediatr. 2007 Nov;151(5):457-62, 462.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.05.004.
PMID: 17961685RESULTDundas I, Chan EY, Bridge PD, McKenzie SA. Diagnostic accuracy of bronchodilator responsiveness in wheezy children. Thorax. 2005 Jan;60(1):13-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.029934.
PMID: 15618576RESULTSharma S, Litonjua AA, Tantisira KG, Fuhlbrigge AL, Szefler SJ, Strunk RC, Zeiger RS, Murphy AJ, Weiss ST; Childhood Asthma Management Program Research Group. Clinical predictors and outcomes of consistent bronchodilator response in the childhood asthma management program. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Nov;122(5):921-928.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.09.004. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
PMID: 18848350RESULTGalant SP, Morphew T, Newcomb RL, Hioe K, Guijon O, Liao O. The relationship of the bronchodilator response phenotype to poor asthma control in children with normal spirometry. J Pediatr. 2011 Jun;158(6):953-959.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.11.029. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
PMID: 21232757RESULTNaqvi M, Thyne S, Choudhry S, Tsai HJ, Navarro D, Castro RA, Nazario S, Rodriguez-Santana JR, Casal J, Torres A, Chapela R, Watson HG, Meade K, LeNoir M, Avila PC, Rodriguez-Cintron W, Burchard EG. Ethnic-specific differences in bronchodilator responsiveness among African Americans, Puerto Ricans, and Mexicans with asthma. J Asthma. 2007 Oct;44(8):639-48. doi: 10.1080/02770900701554441.
PMID: 17943575RESULTEigen H, Bieler H, Grant D, Christoph K, Terrill D, Heilman DK, Ambrosius WT, Tepper RS. Spirometric pulmonary function in healthy preschool children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Mar;163(3 Pt 1):619-23. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.3.2002054.
PMID: 11254514RESULTAurora P, Stocks J, Oliver C, Saunders C, Castle R, Chaziparasidis G, Bush A; London Cystic Fibrosis Collaboration. Quality control for spirometry in preschool children with and without lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 May 15;169(10):1152-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200310-1453OC. Epub 2004 Mar 17.
PMID: 15028561RESULTAmerican Thoracic Society; European Respiratory Society. ATS/ERS statement: raised volume forced expirations in infants: guidelines for current practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Dec 1;172(11):1463-71. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200408-1141ST. No abstract available.
PMID: 16301301RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ling Cao,MD,Pulmonologist, Professor
- Organization
- Capital Institute of Pediatrics
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ling Cao, MD
Capital Institute of Pediatrics, China
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Pulmonary Department, Director of Asthma Center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 23, 2011
First Posted
December 28, 2011
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
January 1, 2014
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
September 28, 2021
Results First Posted
September 28, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09