A Phase II Trial Evaluating an Organ-conserving Strategy by Radiochemotherapy for Muscle-infiltrative Bladder Cancer
GETUGV04
A Randomized Phase II Trial Evaluating an Organ-conserving Strategy With Radiotherapy + CDDP + Gemcitabine vs Radiotherapy + CDDP in Muscle-infiltrative Bladder Cancer
2 other identifiers
interventional
69
1 country
12
Brief Summary
If radical cystectomy remains the standard of care for muscle invasive bladder cancer, consequences of this surgical procedure are often harsh. Over the past years, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy has imposed itself as an alternative treatment. Published data on concomitant radiochemotherapy (radiotherapy/cisplatin or radiotherapy/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil combinations) showed local control rates with bladder preservation at 5 years ranging from 40% to 65% according to the disease stage, and overall survival probabilities ranging from 40% to 50% at 5 years. In order to improve local and systemic prognosis, evaluation of other chemotherapy agents with higher radiosensitizing effect, such as gemcitabine, is justified. Gemcitabine possesses its own anti-cancer activities on urothelial diseases and has a synergetic activity with cisplatin. The investigators completed a monocenter phase I study combining radiotherapy, cisplatin, and twice-weekly gemcitabine, and determined a recommended dose of gemcitabine 25 mg/m². The objective of the present study is to evaluate the combination of radiotherapy + cisplatin + gemcitabine in terms of disease-free survival in non metastatic muscle invasive urothelial cancer patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 6, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 14, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 20, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 25, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 7, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 10, 2025
CompletedOctober 10, 2025
July 1, 2025
11.1 years
December 14, 2011
February 4, 2025
September 18, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Disease-free Survival
The time to relapse is defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of the first event. Time to relapse for patients without any event (local, regional, distance, or death) will be censored at the date of latest information. Patients without relapse and living at 2 years will be considered a success
Two years after the end of the complete therapeutic sequence
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Overall Survival
Up to 5 years
Acute and Late Toxicities
Up to 5 years
Correlation Between Lymphocyte Apoptosis and Severity of Late Toxicities.
Up to 5 years
Study Arms (2)
Radiotherapy + cisplatin
ACTIVE COMPARATORRadiotherapy + cisplatin + gemcitabine
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
RT will encompass bilateral internal and external iliac lymph nodes at a dose of 45 Gy and the bladder up to 63 Gy. Fractionation will be 1.8 Gy per fraction. Cisplatin: 20 mg/m2/day through continuous iv perfusion for 4 consecutive days, from D2 to D5 and from D23 to D26 for the first part of the treatment, then from D2 to D5 if an additional treatment is decided. A cystoscopy with a transurethral resection will be performed 3 weeks after the last day of the first part of radio-chemotherapy. * In the absence of tumor cells, the 2nd part will start on the 4th week or at latest on the 5th week after the last day of the 1st part of radio-chemotherapy. * In case of a microscopic tumor residue or of a local tumor progression, operability will be re-evaluated in view of a radical cystectomy and the patient will exit the study.
Radiotherapy will encompass bilateral internal and external iliac lymph nodes at a dose of 45 Gy and the bladder up to 63 Gy. Fractionation will be 1.8 Gy per fraction. Cisplatin: 20 mg/m2/day through continuous iv perfusion for 4 consecutive days, from D2 to D5 and from D23 to D26 for the first part of the treatment, then from D2 to D5 for the second part of the treatment if an additional treatment is decided. Gemcitabine: iv injection for 30 minutes, twice a week at a dose of 25 mg/m2 on days 2, 5, 9, 12, 16, 19, 23, 26, 30, and 33 for the 1st part of treatment, then on days 2, 5, 9, and 12 for the 2nd part of treatment if an additional treatment is decided (cystoscopy with a transurethral resection). RT will be delivered between 2 and 6 hours after completion of the gemcitabine injection.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Muscle invasive urothelial cancer (front line or following the progression of a superficial tumor), pT2-pT3 stage without lymphatic impairment (N0) and without detectable metastases (M0). An optimal macroscopic resection (TURB) have to be performed
- The proof of invasive tumor to the muscle should be brought by a transurethral resection under anaesthesia less than 8 weeks before or, in the absence, by superficial biopsies and formal imaging. Multiples biopsies in the bladder must also be performed.
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Life expectancy ≥ 6 months
- Kanorfsky index ≥ 70 % (WHO 0, 1, 2)
- Biological criteria: neutrophils ≥ 1500/mm3, Platelets ≥ 100 000/mm3, haemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dl, creatinine clearance \> 60 ml/mn
- No distant metastases (Thorax, abdomen, and pelvic CT-scan, bone scan)
- Efficient contraception for premenopausal women, maintained during the whole treatment and up to two months after the completion of radiotherapy.
- No radiotherapy or chemotherapy history except for in situ bladder lesions.
- No carcinological history except for non melanoma skin tumours, in situ uterine cervix cancer
- No contraindication to gemcitabine or cisplatin.
- No contraindication to radiotherapy
- Information letter and informed consent signed
- Patient covered by social security
You may not qualify if:
- Bladder tumors without any muscle infiltration
- Epidermoid carcinoma or adenocarcinoma
- Distance metastases or extrapelvic node positivity
- Severe digestive history (ulcerative colitis, complicated diverticulitis)
- Pregnancy and breast feeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (12)
Institut Bergonié
Bordeaux, 33000, France
Centre Francois Baclesse
Caen, 14000, France
Hopital Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94010, France
CRLC GF Leclerc
Dijon, 21000, France
CRLC Val d'Aurelle-Paul Lamarque
Montpellier, 34000, France
Centre azuréen de Cancérologie
Mougins, 06250, France
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice, 06189, France
Hopital saint Louis
Paris, 75010, France
HEGP
Paris, 75015, France
Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42705, France
Clinique Patseur
Toulouse, 31300, France
Centre Alexis Vautrin
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511, France
Related Publications (26)
Azria D, Jacot W, Prost P, Culine S, Ychou M, Lemanski C, Dubois JB. [Gemcitabine and ionizing radiations: radiosensitization or radio-chemotherapy combination]. Bull Cancer. 2002 Apr;89(4):369-79. French.
PMID: 12016038BACKGROUNDCaffo O, Fellin G, Graffer U, Valduga F, Bolner A, Luciani L, Tomio L, Galligioni E. Phase I study of gemcitabine and radiotherapy plus cisplatin after transurethral resection as conservative treatment for infiltrating bladder cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Dec 1;57(5):1310-6. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00763-6.
PMID: 14630267BACKGROUNDChauvet B, Brewer Y, Felix-Faure C, Davin JL, Choquenet C, Reboul F. Concurrent cisplatin and radiotherapy for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer who are not candidates for radical cystectomy. J Urol. 1996 Oct;156(4):1258-62.
PMID: 8808849BACKGROUNDChauvet B, Davin JL, Alfonsi M, Berger C, Vincent P, Reboul F. [Conservative treatment of bladder cancers with radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy: results and perspectives]. Cancer Radiother. 1998 Sep-Oct;2(5):499-504. doi: 10.1016/s1278-3218(98)80058-9. French.
PMID: 9868392BACKGROUNDChoudhury A, Swindell R, Logue JP, Elliott PA, Livsey JE, Wise M, Symonds P, Wylie JP, Ramani V, Sangar V, Lyons J, Bottomley I, McCaul D, Clarke NW, Kiltie AE, Cowan RA. Phase II study of conformal hypofractionated radiotherapy with concurrent gemcitabine in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 20;29(6):733-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.5721. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
PMID: 21205754BACKGROUNDDunst J, Sauer R, Schrott KM, Kuhn R, Wittekind C, Altendorf-Hofmann A. Organ-sparing treatment of advanced bladder cancer: a 10-year experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Sep 30;30(2):261-6. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90003-5.
PMID: 7928455BACKGROUNDEnsign LG, Gehan EA, Kamen DS, Thall PF. An optimal three-stage design for phase II clinical trials. Stat Med. 1994 Sep 15;13(17):1727-36. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780131704.
PMID: 7997706BACKGROUNDFechner G, Perabo FG, Schmidt DH, Haase L, Ludwig E, Schueller H, Blatter J, Mller SC, Albers P. Preclinical evaluation of a radiosensitizing effect of gemcitabine in p53 mutant and p53 wild type bladder cancer cells. Urology. 2003 Feb;61(2):468-73. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02156-8.
PMID: 12597983BACKGROUNDHagan MP, Winter KA, Kaufman DS, Wajsman Z, Zietman AL, Heney NM, Toonkel LM, Jones CU, Roberts JD, Shipley WU. RTOG 97-06: initial report of a phase I-II trial of selective bladder conservation using TURBT, twice-daily accelerated irradiation sensitized with cisplatin, and adjuvant MCV combination chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Nov 1;57(3):665-72. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00718-1.
PMID: 14529770BACKGROUNDHerman JM, Smith DC, Montie J, Hayman JA, Sullivan MA, Kent E, Griffith KA, Esper P, Sandler HM. Prospective quality-of-life assessment in patients receiving concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy as a bladder preservation strategy. Urology. 2004 Jul;64(1):69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.02.024.
PMID: 15245938BACKGROUNDHousset M, Maulard C, Chretien Y, Dufour B, Delanian S, Huart J, Colardelle F, Brunel P, Baillet F. Combined radiation and chemotherapy for invasive transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Nov;11(11):2150-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.11.2150.
PMID: 8229129BACKGROUNDKent E, Sandler H, Montie J, Lee C, Herman J, Esper P, Fardig J, Smith DC. Combined-modality therapy with gemcitabine and radiotherapy as a bladder preservation strategy: results of a phase I trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 1;22(13):2540-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.10.070.
PMID: 15226322BACKGROUNDLagrange JL, Bascoul-Mollevi C, Geoffrois L, Beckendorf V, Ferrero JM, Joly F, Allouache N, Bachaud JM, Chevreau C, Kramar A, Chauvet B; Study Group on Genito-Urinary Tumors. Quality of life assessment after concurrent chemoradiation for invasive bladder cancer: results of a multicenter prospective study (GETUG 97-015). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jan 1;79(1):172-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.038. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
PMID: 20385453BACKGROUNDLawrence TS, Chang EY, Hahn TM, Shewach DS. Delayed radiosensitization of human colon carcinoma cells after a brief exposure to 2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine (Gemcitabine). Clin Cancer Res. 1997 May;3(5):777-82.
PMID: 9815749BACKGROUNDMoore MJ, Tannock IF, Ernst DS, Huan S, Murray N. Gemcitabine: a promising new agent in the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Dec;15(12):3441-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.12.3441.
PMID: 9396395BACKGROUNDRodel C, Grabenbauer GG, Kuhn R, Papadopoulos T, Dunst J, Meyer M, Schrott KM, Sauer R. Combined-modality treatment and selective organ preservation in invasive bladder cancer: long-term results. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jul 15;20(14):3061-71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.11.027.
PMID: 12118019BACKGROUNDSangar VK, McBain CA, Lyons J, Ramani VA, Logue JP, Wylie JP, Clarke NW, Cowan RA. Phase I study of conformal radiotherapy with concurrent gemcitabine in locally advanced bladder cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Feb 1;61(2):420-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.074.
PMID: 15667962BACKGROUNDShewach DS, Hahn TM, Chang E, Hertel LW, Lawrence TS. Metabolism of 2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine and radiation sensitization of human colon carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 1994 Jun 15;54(12):3218-23.
PMID: 8205542BACKGROUNDShipley WU, Kaufman DS, Tester WJ, Pilepich MV, Sandler HM; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Overview of bladder cancer trials in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Cancer. 2003 Apr 15;97(8 Suppl):2115-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11282.
PMID: 12673704BACKGROUNDStadler WM, Kuzel T, Roth B, Raghavan D, Dorr FA. Phase II study of single-agent gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Nov;15(11):3394-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.11.3394.
PMID: 9363871BACKGROUNDStein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, Groshen S, Feng AC, Boyd S, Skinner E, Bochner B, Thangathurai D, Mikhail M, Raghavan D, Skinner DG. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Feb 1;19(3):666-75. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.666.
PMID: 11157016BACKGROUNDTester W, Caplan R, Heaney J, Venner P, Whittington R, Byhardt R, True L, Shipley W. Neoadjuvant combined modality program with selective organ preservation for invasive bladder cancer: results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group phase II trial 8802. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Jan;14(1):119-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.1.119.
PMID: 8558186BACKGROUNDAdvanced Bladder Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003 Jun 7;361(9373):1927-34. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13580-5.
PMID: 12801735BACKGROUNDVogelzang NJ, Stadler WM. Gemcitabine and other new chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of metastatic bladder cancer. Urology. 1999 Feb;53(2):243-50. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00501-9.
PMID: 9933034BACKGROUNDvon der Maase H, Hansen SW, Roberts JT, Dogliotti L, Oliver T, Moore MJ, Bodrogi I, Albers P, Knuth A, Lippert CM, Kerbrat P, Sanchez Rovira P, Wersall P, Cleall SP, Roychowdhury DF, Tomlin I, Visseren-Grul CM, Conte PF. Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Sep;18(17):3068-77. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.17.3068.
PMID: 11001674BACKGROUNDAzria D, Riou O, Rebillard X, Thezenas S, Thuret R, Fenoglietto P, Pouessel D, Culine S. Combined chemoradiation therapy with twice-weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin for organ preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: long-term results of a phase 1 trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 15;88(4):853-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.016. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
PMID: 24368064DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
no data for Measurement of Quality of Life
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Mme Aurore Moussion, Director of Direction of Clinical Research and Innovation
- Organization
- INSTITUT REGIONAL DU CANCER DE MONTPELLIER
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Azria David, MD
ICM Val d'Aurelle
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 14, 2011
First Posted
December 20, 2011
Study Start
July 6, 2011
Primary Completion
July 25, 2022
Study Completion
December 7, 2024
Last Updated
October 10, 2025
Results First Posted
October 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual data are listed in the form of datalistings (lists by chapter) and "patient profile" (summary of main data per patient). The database is frozen for validated data. This basic freezing is done by the dated copy of the database and then by a selection of observations meeting the criteria. This process is repeated until the complete recovery of the validated data.