Study to Evaluate the Potential of Air Structuring Protein to Elicit Allergic Reactions in Mold Sensitized People

NCT01494194 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: KQC100140
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 252
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Air Structuring Protein (ASP) is a small protein derived from a fungus which is already widely used to produce enzymes that are added to foods. ASP has the possibility of stabilising the air phase of ice-cream and therefore there is interest in ASP as a potential ice-cream ingredient. Toxicological tests have also been carried out to further confirm the safety of the material and no evidence of genotoxicity or acute toxicity has been observed in any of the tests. As part of the safety evaluation of a new protein for use in foods, the potential allergenicity is also investigated and Unilever is sponsoring a study to evaluate this aspect of ASP. This study will investigate:

• Whether ASP has the potential to elicit a positive skin prick test (SPT) in a population of participants with proven sensitivity to mould.
• Whether ASP is responsible for any positive SPT reactions, should they occur.
• And if any positive SPT reactions to ASP occur, whether such reactions are clinically relevant with respect to food allergy. The study is divided in three stages. In Stage 1 and Stage 2, the SPT is "open label," which means that both the participant and the study doctor will know which materials are being tested. In Stage 3, the food challenge has a "crossover" design, meaning that participants will take one of the products (ASP or placebo \[food containing no ASP\]) during the first half of the study and the other treatment during the second half. The order of ASP and placebo will be decided randomly, like tossing a coin. To make the comparison between ASP and placebo as fair as possible, the food challenge is "double blinded." This means that neither the participant nor the study doctor will know which kind of products (ASP or placebo) the participant is taking. This is a multi centre study which is taking place in the UK.

Conditions

Allergy to Mold

Keywords

Mold sensitized

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Positive skin prick test response to test material

  The number and size of positive SPTs will be recorded together with data of concomitant allergies and the minimum eliciting concentration (SPT-min) in the skin.

  15 minutes after application

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• The number of positive Double Blind Placebo Controlled Food Challenge reactions in those with positive skin prick test result

  2 hours after administration

Study Arms (3)

placebo for food challenge

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Other: Placebo sorbet

ASP Skin prick solution

EXPERIMENTAL

Other: Air Structuring Protein

ASP sorbet

EXPERIMENTAL

Other: Air Structuring Protein

Interventions

Air Structuring Protein OTHER

A novel food protein preparation

ASP Skin prick solution; ASP sorbet

Placebo sorbet OTHER

Placebo sorbet for double blind placebo controlled food challenge

placebo for food challenge

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 60 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Males and females aged 18-60 years.
• Mould sensitised subjects diagnosed according to the EAACI/Ga2len guidelines.
• Written informed consent from the subject.
• Normally active and otherwise judged to be in good health on the basis of medical history and screening assessment.
• No allergic symptoms on the day of investigation.

You may not qualify if:

• Pregnancy or lactation.
• Failure to comply with the protocol.
• Medication that may interfere with wheal formation in the skin or response to DBPCFC
• Participation in another clinical study involving a SPT within 30 days prior to Visit 1 or DBPCFC within 30 days prior to DBPCFC.
• Current skin disease of any type (eczema, acne, dermatitis, etc.) on the test site(s).
• Subjects with a condition the Investigator believes would interfere with the evaluation of the subject, including proceeding to DBPCFC, or may put the subject at undue risk, e.g., a history of anaphylactic reactions and history of reactions to any component of the DBPCFC matrix other than ASP.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Unilever SEAC: lead

Study Sites (1)

National Heart and Lung Institute, MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Centre for Respiratory Infection, Imperial College London

London, W2 1PG, United Kingdom

Location

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Intervention Model: SINGLE GROUP
• Sponsor Type: INDUSTRY
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: December 12, 2011
• First Posted: December 16, 2011
• Study Start: December 1, 2011
• Primary Completion: July 1, 2012
• Study Completion: July 1, 2012
• Last Updated: June 8, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-06

Locations

GB (1)