Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment With Topical Photodynamic Therapy With Fractionated 5-aminolevulinic Acid 20% Versus Two Stage Methylaminolevulinate
Treatment of Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma by Topical Photodynamic Therapy With Fractionated 5-aminolevulinic Acid 20% Versus Two Stage Topical Photodynamic Therapy With Methylaminolevulinate
1 other identifier
interventional
162
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Skin cancer is the most common cancer in Caucasians, and a basal cell carcinoma (BCC) being the most common skin cancer with around 44,000 new tumours per year, and its incidence is still rising. In the past it has been a disease of the elderly patient but as a consequence of recreational sun exposure and tanning beds, more young patients develop a skin cancer as well. There are different subtypes of BCC and most subtypes are treated by surgical excision. Nowadays, non-invasive techniques as photodynamic therapy (PDT) are common practice to treat superficial BCC (sBCC). Because of these techniques treatment by surgical excision can be avoided with the possibility of complications and scar formation. Both 5-aminolevulino acid (5-ALA) and the more lipophilic methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) can be used as a precursor of the photosensitiser. These agents generate an excess of protoporphyrin IX in metabolic active cells, which are illuminated by a specific light source leading to release of reactive oxygen radicals in tissue. The result is apoptosis and necrosis of tumour cells. At the moment, two treatment protocols are used in the Netherlands: the fractionated 5-ALA 20% (Fagron) protocol according to de Haas and the MAL (Metvix, Galderma) protocol. Because MAL was first marketed and registered as a treatment option for premalignant and superficial malignancies most hospitals in the Netherlands use this topical agent. However, there is no evidence which of the 2 agents is more (cost-)effective and/ or preferred by patients. Objective: to determine which treatment is the most effective treatment in terms of prevention of treatment failure, cost saving and patients preference when comparing fractionated 5-ALA 20% PDT versus MAL PDT in 2 treatment sessions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Aug 2013
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedJanuary 31, 2014
January 1, 2014
1.7 years
December 5, 2011
January 30, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Treatment failure
Histological proven treatment failure one year after treatment of sBCC with fractionated 5-ALA 20% PDT versus MAL PDT in 2 sessions. If there is any clinical suspicion of residual tumour at control visits 3 and 12 months posttreatment, a 3 mm punch biopsy will be taken to confirm the diagnosis by histopathology.
12 months posttreatment
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Patient preferences
1 week posttreatment
Health care costs
12 months posttreatment
Study Arms (2)
Fractionated 5-ALA HCl 20% gel PDT
ACTIVE COMPARATORTwice on day 1
Methylaminolevulinate PDT in 2 sessions
ACTIVE COMPARATOROn day 1 and 8
Interventions
The methylaminolevulinate creme is applied to the tumour with a margin of 1 cm, ± 1-2 mm thick. Tegaderm®, a gauze and tinfoil is placed over the area to prevent contact with UV light. After 4 hours the area is illuminated with Aktilite (632 nm, 570-670 nm, 75 J/cm2). The light intensity at the lesion surface should not exceed 200 mW/cm2. During illumination a fan is used to cool the treatment site. After the first treatment the skin area is covered to prevent exposure to daylight during 48 hours. After one week (on day 8), the same procedure is repeated. After the treatment the skin area is covered to prevent exposure to daylight during 48 hours. A side-effect of the treatment is a burning pain during illumination and slight erythema afterwards lasting a few days. Sometimes blistering occurs.
The 5-ALA HCl 20% gel is applied to the tumour with a margin of 1 cm, ± 1-2 mm thick. Tegaderm®, a gauze and tinfoil is placed over the area to prevent contact with UV light. After 4 hours the area is illuminated with Aktilite (632 nm). During illumination a fan is used to cool the treatment site. The treatment site is covered again with Tegaderm for 2 hours after first treatment, whereupon a second illumination with the same light takes place. A side-effect of the treatment is a burning pain during illumination and slight erythema afterwards lasting a few days. Sometimes blistering occurs. Patients are advised to avoid direct sunlight two days after treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Minimal age of 18 years
- Histological proven BCC
- Primary BCC (no previous treatment)
- Being able to understand instructions
You may not qualify if:
- Age under 18 years
- No histological proven BCC
- Recurrent BCC (previously treated)
- Not able to understand instructions
- Concomitant disease requiring systematic immunosuppressive treatment
- Genetic skin cancer disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Maastricht University Medical Centerlead
- Erasmus Medical Centercollaborator
- VieCuri Medical Centrecollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Maastricht University Medical Center
Maastricht, Limburg, 6202 AZ, Netherlands
VieCuri Medical Centre
Venlo, Limburg, 5912 BL, Netherlands
Erasmus Medical Centre
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015 CE, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2011
First Posted
December 14, 2011
Study Start
August 1, 2013
Primary Completion
April 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 31, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-01