NCT01489436

Brief Summary

New minimally invasive surgical treatments are often outpatient procedures with low complication rates, promising fast recovery. The traditional physician-reported outcomes such as complication rates, blood loss, and hospital stay are not useful to guide treatment recommendations for one or the other minimally invasive procedure. This study aims to apply patient-reported outcomes developed within the NIH framework for cancer research and chronic disease treatment to the comparative effectiveness research in minimally invasive procedures for benign disease.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
118

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2011

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 25, 2011

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 9, 2011

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

March 19, 2019

Status Verified

March 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

August 25, 2011

Last Update Submit

March 15, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

gallstone diseasecholecystectomyminimally invasivesurgicallaparoscopicsingle portcytokine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale

    The investigators will utilize the Patient-Reported Outcomes from the VAS to measure changes from Baseline to day 1 post OP. A 15-mm difference on a 100-mm visual analog scale with a standard deviation of 25 mm at any time point will constitute a clinically relevant difference.

    Baseline to Post Operative day 1

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Quality of Life (QOL)

    up to 7 days

  • Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Data

    During surgery from incision to closure

  • Cytokine levels in blood

    Baseline, during surgery form incision to closure, 1 hour post OP and 4 hour post OP

Study Arms (2)

Single port cholecystectomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In brief, a flexible, multi-sleeve 15-mm trocar designed specifically for single-port cholecystectomy will be inserted at the umbilicus via a 15-mm single incision. An additional 2-mm grasping device may be introduced in the right upper quadrant for retraction if necessary; this device is placed percutaneously without the need for a trocar. A 5-mm laparoscopic clip applier will be introduced through the periumbilical trocar to ligate the cystic artery and the cystic duct. The gallbladder will be removed through the umbilical port, adequate hemostasis is ensured, the umbilical trocar removed, and the single operative site will be closed and sterile dressings applied (four Band-Aids).

Procedure: Single-port cholecystectomy

Four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The control procedure for the research practicum is a four-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the current gold-standard operation. This approach utilizes a 10-mm trocar placed at the umbilicus via a 15-mm incision and three separate subcostal 5-mm trocars placed via separate 5-mm incisions. The gallbladder will be removed through the umbilical trocar site. On occasion, this incision needs to be enlarged to accommodate removal of the gallbladder. Trocar sites will be closed and sterile dressings applied (four Band-Aids).

Procedure: Four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Interventions

In brief, a flexible, multi-sleeve 15-mm trocar designed specifically for single-port cholecystectomy will be inserted at the umbilicus via a 15-mm single incision. This trocar permits simultaneous introduction of multiple instruments, including a 5-mm flexible-tip laparoscope. Standard 5-mm instruments will be used for retraction and dissection. An additional 2-mm grasping device may be introduced in the right upper quadrant for retraction if necessary. A 5-mm laparoscopic clip applier will be introduced through the periumbilical trocar to ligate the cystic artery and the cystic duct. The gallbladder will be removed through the umbilical port.

Also known as: Minimally invasive surgery
Single port cholecystectomy

The control procedure for the research practicum is a four-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the current gold-standard operation. This approach utilizes a 10-mm trocar placed at the umbilicus via a 15-mm incision and three separate subcostal 5-mm trocars placed via separate 5-mm incisions. The gallbladder will be removed through the umbilical trocar site. On occasion, this incision needs to be enlarged to accommodate removal of the gallbladder.

Also known as: Minimally invasive surgery
Four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \) patients undergoing cholecystectomy in an elective setting for symptomatic gallstone disease.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients \<18 years of age
  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients with ASA-class \>3
  • Patients undergoing treatment for chronic pain with opiates
  • Patients with biopsy proven gallbladder cancer
  • Patients who cannot provide consent for the study
  • Patients not willing to participate in the study
  • Prisoners/Institutionalized individuals

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Bingener J, Skaran P, McConico A, Novotny P, Wettstein P, Sletten DM, Park M, Low P, Sloan J. A Double-Blinded Randomized Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Procedures Using Patient-Reported Outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jul;221(1):111-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.022. Epub 2015 Mar 3.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cholelithiasis

Interventions

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Biliary Tract DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Surgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Juliane Bingener-Casey, M.D.

    Mayo Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2011

First Posted

December 9, 2011

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion

March 1, 2014

Study Completion

March 1, 2014

Last Updated

March 19, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-03

Locations