A Comparison of Single Port and Four Port Laparoscopic Gallbladder Removal
CENoMIP
Comparative Effectiveness of Novel Minimally Invasive Procedures
1 other identifier
interventional
118
1 country
1
Brief Summary
New minimally invasive surgical treatments are often outpatient procedures with low complication rates, promising fast recovery. The traditional physician-reported outcomes such as complication rates, blood loss, and hospital stay are not useful to guide treatment recommendations for one or the other minimally invasive procedure. This study aims to apply patient-reported outcomes developed within the NIH framework for cancer research and chronic disease treatment to the comparative effectiveness research in minimally invasive procedures for benign disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2011
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 25, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2014
CompletedMarch 19, 2019
March 1, 2019
2.7 years
August 25, 2011
March 15, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
The investigators will utilize the Patient-Reported Outcomes from the VAS to measure changes from Baseline to day 1 post OP. A 15-mm difference on a 100-mm visual analog scale with a standard deviation of 25 mm at any time point will constitute a clinically relevant difference.
Baseline to Post Operative day 1
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Quality of Life (QOL)
up to 7 days
Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Data
During surgery from incision to closure
Cytokine levels in blood
Baseline, during surgery form incision to closure, 1 hour post OP and 4 hour post OP
Study Arms (2)
Single port cholecystectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn brief, a flexible, multi-sleeve 15-mm trocar designed specifically for single-port cholecystectomy will be inserted at the umbilicus via a 15-mm single incision. An additional 2-mm grasping device may be introduced in the right upper quadrant for retraction if necessary; this device is placed percutaneously without the need for a trocar. A 5-mm laparoscopic clip applier will be introduced through the periumbilical trocar to ligate the cystic artery and the cystic duct. The gallbladder will be removed through the umbilical port, adequate hemostasis is ensured, the umbilical trocar removed, and the single operative site will be closed and sterile dressings applied (four Band-Aids).
Four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control procedure for the research practicum is a four-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the current gold-standard operation. This approach utilizes a 10-mm trocar placed at the umbilicus via a 15-mm incision and three separate subcostal 5-mm trocars placed via separate 5-mm incisions. The gallbladder will be removed through the umbilical trocar site. On occasion, this incision needs to be enlarged to accommodate removal of the gallbladder. Trocar sites will be closed and sterile dressings applied (four Band-Aids).
Interventions
In brief, a flexible, multi-sleeve 15-mm trocar designed specifically for single-port cholecystectomy will be inserted at the umbilicus via a 15-mm single incision. This trocar permits simultaneous introduction of multiple instruments, including a 5-mm flexible-tip laparoscope. Standard 5-mm instruments will be used for retraction and dissection. An additional 2-mm grasping device may be introduced in the right upper quadrant for retraction if necessary. A 5-mm laparoscopic clip applier will be introduced through the periumbilical trocar to ligate the cystic artery and the cystic duct. The gallbladder will be removed through the umbilical port.
The control procedure for the research practicum is a four-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the current gold-standard operation. This approach utilizes a 10-mm trocar placed at the umbilicus via a 15-mm incision and three separate subcostal 5-mm trocars placed via separate 5-mm incisions. The gallbladder will be removed through the umbilical trocar site. On occasion, this incision needs to be enlarged to accommodate removal of the gallbladder.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \) patients undergoing cholecystectomy in an elective setting for symptomatic gallstone disease.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients \<18 years of age
- Pregnant patients
- Patients with ASA-class \>3
- Patients undergoing treatment for chronic pain with opiates
- Patients with biopsy proven gallbladder cancer
- Patients who cannot provide consent for the study
- Patients not willing to participate in the study
- Prisoners/Institutionalized individuals
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Related Publications (1)
Bingener J, Skaran P, McConico A, Novotny P, Wettstein P, Sletten DM, Park M, Low P, Sloan J. A Double-Blinded Randomized Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Procedures Using Patient-Reported Outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jul;221(1):111-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.022. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
PMID: 26095558RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Juliane Bingener-Casey, M.D.
Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 25, 2011
First Posted
December 9, 2011
Study Start
July 1, 2011
Primary Completion
March 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2014
Last Updated
March 19, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03