Gemcitabine-Carboplatin Versus Gemcitabine-Oxaliplatin in Cisplatin-unfit Urothelial Carcinoma
COACH
2 other identifiers
interventional
80
1 country
5
Brief Summary
Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the standard regimen for advanced urothelial carcinoma. But cisplatin-unfit patients account for up to 30-40% of patients in clinical practice. Recently reported phase II/III trial of EORTC 30986 comparing gemcitabine/carboplatin (GCb) with MCAVI (Methotrexate, Carboplatin, Vinblastine) suggested that GCb be the preferred regimen over MCAVI based on the response rates, adverse events, and severe acute toxicities. But the grade 3 or worse toxicities associated with GCb are not infrequent and need more effective and more tolerable regimens. GemOx has been reported to be effective and have very favorable toxicity profiles.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 8, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedSeptember 25, 2014
September 1, 2014
4.7 years
December 5, 2011
September 22, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Response rate
Response rate based on RECIST 1.1
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Safety
12 months
Progression-free survival
1 year
Overall survival
1 year
Study Arms (2)
GCb
ACTIVE COMPARATORGemcitabine plus Carboplatin
GemOx
EXPERIMENTALGemcitabine plus Oxaliplatin
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Cytologically of histologically confirmed urothelial carcinoma
- Locally advanced or metastatic disease
- Measurable disease according to RECIST v.1.1
- ECOG PS 0-2
- Cisplatin-unfit condition (any of the followings: NYHA functional class 3, creatinine clearance 30-60 ml/min, and ECOG PS=2)
- Adequate organ function
- Chemotherapy-naive
You may not qualify if:
- Histology other than urothelial carcinoma, but squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma mixed with urothelial carcinoma are allowed
- CNS metastases
- Peripheral neuropathy grade 2 or worse
- Serious medical or surgical conditions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Keimyeong University Dongsan Medical Center
Daegu, 700-712, South Korea
Chungnam University Hospital
Daejeon, 301-721, South Korea
Korea University Anam Hospital
Seoul, 136-705, South Korea
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 138-736, South Korea
Chung Ang University Hospital
Seoul, 156-755, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Park I, Kim BS, Lim HY, Kim HJ, Lee HJ, Choi YJ, Park KH, Lee KH, Yoon S, Hong B, Hong JH, Ahn H, Lee JL. Gemcitabine plus carboplatin versus gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin in cisplatin-unfit patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: a randomised phase II study (COACH, KCSG GU10-16). Eur J Cancer. 2020 Mar;127:183-190. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.08.034. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
PMID: 31668839DERIVED
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2011
First Posted
December 8, 2011
Study Start
October 1, 2010
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
September 25, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-09