Anterolateral Versus Posterolateral Approach to the Fractured Hip Arthroplasty

NCT01486641 | Completed DMC

• 1 other identifier: Sebastian-12
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 160
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 2

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the anterolateral in comparison to posterolateral approach to the hip arthroplasty gives an equal or better clinical results.

Conditions

Femoral Neck Fracture

Keywords

femoral neck fracture; arthroplasty; surgical approach; anterolateral; posterolateral

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Womac

  1 year postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes (2)

• EQ5D

  1 year postoperatively

• Harris Hip Score

  1 year postoperatively

Study Arms (2)

Anterolateral approach

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture operated through the anterolateral approach to the hip arthroplasty. Lubinus total hip arthroplasty or varikopf hemiarthroplasty.

Procedure: Anterolateral approach

Posterolateral approach

NO INTERVENTION

Patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture operated through the posterolateral approach to the hip arthroplasty. Lubinus total hip arthroplasty or varikopf hemiarthroplasty.

Interventions

Anterolateral approach PROCEDURE

Anterolateral approach acording to Gammer for hip arthroplasty.

Also known as: Anterolateral approach according to Gammer., Lubinus total hip arthroplasty or varikopf hemiarthroplasty.

Anterolateral approach

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 65 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Age \> 65 years
• Displaced femoral neck fracture

You may not qualify if:

• Pathologic fracture
• Not Swedish speaker
• Not living in Västernorrlands county

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Sundsvall Hospital: lead

Study Sites (2)

Sundsvall Hospital

Sundsvall, Västernorrland County, 851 86, Sweden

Location

Department of orthopedic surgery Sundsvall Hospital

Sundsvall, 851 86, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (3)

• Ritter MA, Harty LD, Keating ME, Faris PM, Meding JB. A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Apr;(385):95-9. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200104000-00016.

  PMID: 11302333 BACKGROUND

• Gore DR, Murray MP, Sepic SB, Gardner GM. Anterolateral compared to posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: differences in component positioning, hip strength, and hip motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 May;(165):180-7.

  PMID: 7075057 BACKGROUND

• Skoldenberg O, Ekman A, Salemyr M, Boden H. Reduced dislocation rate after hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures when changing from posterolateral to anterolateral approach. Acta Orthop. 2010 Oct;81(5):583-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.519170.

  PMID: 20860452 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Femoral Neck Fractures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hip Fractures; Femoral Fractures; Fractures, Bone; Wounds and Injuries; Hip Injuries; Leg Injuries

Study Officials

• Arkan S Sayed-Noor

  Umeå University

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: NON RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: December 2, 2011
• First Posted: December 6, 2011
• Study Start: February 1, 2012
• Primary Completion: June 1, 2015
• Study Completion: June 1, 2015
• Last Updated: August 2, 2017

Record last verified: 2014-04

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will share
• Time Frame: Publishing resultat in 2017
• Access Criteria: Open Access

Locations

SE (2)