Study Stopped
Enrolment stopped on December 01, 2014 since after 3 years, only 13 patients were included (instead of 274) (Date of last visit last patient : October 3, 2013).
Efficacy of corticoïd Infiltration Via Sacro-coccygien Hiatus in Discal Sciatica
Hiatus
Open Randomized Study on the Efficacy of corticoïd Infiltration Versus Physiological Solution Infiltration Versus Feigning of Infiltration Via Sacro-coccygien Hiatus Versus Natural Evolution in Discal Sciatica
1 other identifier
interventional
13
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The specific aim of this study is to determine whether a medical intervention improve status of patients with discal sciatica and if yes which type of intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Dec 2011
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedDecember 2, 2014
December 1, 2014
3 years
November 29, 2011
December 1, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
difference between the mean leg pain during the latest 24 hours preceding the infiltration and that preceding the visit S4
To determine the difference between the mean leg pain during the latest 24 hours preceding the infiltration and the mean leg pain preceding the visit S4 (visit 4 weeks after the infiltration). If difference is of 50% patient will be considered "improved".
week 4
Secondary Outcomes (5)
determine whether medical intervention improve status of patients
determine whether medical intervention improve status of patients
To determine whether intervention can decrease the number of surgeries (follow-up of 6 months)
To determine whether intervention can decrease the intake of drugs
To determine whether intervention can decrease the functional handicap
Study Arms (4)
corticoïd
EXPERIMENTALanesthetic bloc (10 ml of xylocaïne 1%) immediately followed with corticoid (125mg in.5 ml)
physiological solution
PLACEBO COMPARATORanesthetic bloc (10 ml of xylocaïne 1%) immediately followed with physiological solution (20 ml)
feigning of peridural infiltration
SHAM COMPARATORfeigning of peridural infiltration : anesthetic bloc (10 ml of xylocaïne 1%) immediately followed with placement of empty syringe in peridural.
no intervention
NO INTERVENTIONnatural evolution of discal sciatica
Interventions
anesthetic bloc (10 ml of xylocaïne 1%) immediately followed with corticoid (125mg in.5 ml)
feigning of peridural infiltration : anesthetic bloc (10 ml of xylocaïne 1%) immediately followed with placement of empty syringe in peridural.
anesthetic bloc (10 ml of xylocaïne 1%) immediately followed with physiological solution (20 ml)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult with age equal or above to 18.
- Subject affiliated to French health insurance (Sécurité Sociale)
- Sciatic pain evolving since more than 1 month and less than 3 months
- Leg irradiation (pain above the knee)- True Lasègue- Mean leg pain during the latest 24 hours above 40 on an analogic visual scale (from 0 to 100)
- Pain induced by palpation in regards to the neo-articulation
- Pain not relieved by medical treatment with non steroids anti- inflammatory drugs or antalgics No sign of seriousness : no motor deficiency (muscular testing above or equal to 4 on an international scale (from 0 to 5), no sphincter deficiency, mean leg pain during the latest 24 hours below 80 on an analogic visual scale (from 0 to 100).
- Scanner of MRI since less than 3 months confirming discal hernia L4L5 or L5S1 in accordance with the clinic.
- Informed consent form signed
You may not qualify if:
- Age below 18
- Clinical arguments in favour of a non discal origin- Pregnant women
- Diabetic patient- Past history of diverticulosis complicated with severe arterial hypertension- Patient unable to understand the protocol
- No autonomy for coming to the hospital (no budget allocated for patient transportation)
- Hypersensitivity to local anesthetics with "liaison amide"-Hypersensitivity to one of the components-Porphyria
- Local or generalized infection, suspicion of infection
- Severe troubles of coagulation, anti-coagulant treatment taken- Imaging non concording
- Past history of infiltration via the sacro-coccygien hiatus
- Past history of lombar rachis surgery- Body mass index above 40.
- Intake of "b-bloquants"- Intake of antiarrythmics possibly giving "torsades de pointe" ("amiodarone, disopyramide, quinidiniques, sotalol,…)"-"Cimétidine" used at doses above or equal to 800mg/day.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universitary Hospital
Nantes, Loire Atlantique, 44093, France
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joelle Glemarec, Doctor
CHU of Nantes
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Grégoire CORMIER, Doctor
CHD of La Roche/Yon
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2011
First Posted
December 1, 2011
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
December 2, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-12