Comparing Clinical Performance of Novice Trainee Endoscopists Using Conventional Air Insufflation Versus Warm Water Infusion Colonoscopy
Randomized Cross-Over Comparing Clinical Performance of Novice Trainee Endoscopists Using Conventional Air Insufflation Versus Warm Water Infusion Colonoscopy
1 other identifier
observational
6
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hypothesis: Novice trainees will achieve significantly higher clinical competence and patient satisfaction scores with the use of warm water infusion method when compared with traditional air insufflation Primary outcome: adenoma detection rate Secondary outcomes: (1) independent cecal intubation rate, (2) trainer assessment of trainee's colonoscopy skills, (3) trainee's assessment of clinical confidence, (4) procedural medication requirement, (5) patient pain level during procedure, (6) patient satisfaction at procedure completion, and (7) patient willingness to repeat procedure' Specific Aim: To demonstrate the stated hypothesis via above outcome measures. The long term goal is to provide evidence to influence other training institutions to consider education in the warm water infusion method'
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started May 2012
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 27, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 30, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedJune 27, 2017
June 1, 2017
4.3 years
November 27, 2011
June 26, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
adenoma detection rate
two years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
independent cecal intubation rate
two years
Study Arms (2)
Water Colonoscopy Method
As first described by Dr. Felix W. Leung, the maneuvers can be summarized as warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation combined with suction removal of all residual colonic air and residual feces by water exchange. The air pump will be turned off before insertion of the colonoscope into the rectum to avoid accidental insufflation of air. Warm water (at 36-37ºC) maintained using a water bath and heat saver envelop will be infused intermittently. The minimum amount of water needed to distend the colon and open the lumen will be used during scope insertion. Cecal intubation will be suggested by appropriate movement of the endoscopic image on the monitor screen when the right lower quadrant is palpated or the appendiceal orifice visualized under water. The cecum will then be distended by air to confirm visualization of the ileocecal valve and appendiceal orifice. No specific limit will be set for the volume of water to be used.
Air Colonoscopy Method
The minimal amount of air will be used during insertion to open the lumen. Minimal amounts of water (10 to 50 mL) at room temperature will be used for washing of residual feces. If insertion is hindered by scope looping, attempts at loop reduction will be made. If advancement does not occur within 3 to 5 minutes, an assistant will provide abdominal compression, followed by changing the patient's position to facilitate passage of the colonoscope. Cecal intubation will be suggested by identification of the appendiceal orifice and ileocecal valve or intubation of the terminal ileum.
Eligibility Criteria
First Year Gastroenterology Trainees
You may qualify if:
- Novice endoscopists without prior colonoscopy experience
You may not qualify if:
- Trainees who do not meet the basic prerequisites as stated above, or who are not willing to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California Davis
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 27, 2011
First Posted
November 30, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
June 27, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06