Comparative Study of Photodynamic Therapy vs. CO2 Laser Therapy in Treatment of Actinic Keratoses
Prospective, Single-center, Investigator-blinded, Randomized, Half-side, Comparative Study of Photodynamic Therapy vs. CO2 Laser Therapy in Treatment of Actinic Keratoses
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether photodynamic therapy or CO2 laser therapy is superior in the treatment of actinic keratoses with respect to efficacy and side effects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 29, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedDecember 8, 2011
December 1, 2011
9 months
November 24, 2011
December 7, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of actinic keratoses 3 months after treatment
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Histologic features
1 month after therapy
Epidermal thickness in optical coherence tomography
1 month after therapy
Interventions
CO2 laser therapy
Treatment with 5-ALA cream, application time at least 4 h, red light radiation with 76 J/cm²
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- men and women with clinical and histological diagnosed, symmetrical distributed actinic keratoses
- at least 2 actinic keratoses, on each of both treatment areas at least one
- Patients must be 18 years or older.
You may not qualify if:
- Age 17 years or younger
- lack of patient's informed consent for any of the two treatments
- contraindication for Co2 therapy or for photodynamic therapy
- skin infection in the treatment area
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Ruhr University
Bochum, 44791, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. med. Nina Scola, consultant in Ruhr University of Bochum
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2011
First Posted
November 29, 2011
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Last Updated
December 8, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-12