Comparing Robotics and Laparoscopy With Laparotomy/Open Surgery for Endometrial Cancer
GOC2
A Prospective Study Evaluating Surgical and Quality of Life Outcomes in Robotics and Laparoscopy Compared to Laparotomy in Early Stage Endometrial Cancer
1 other identifier
observational
550
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The use of robotic surgery in the management of gynecologic cancers has increased exponentially in the United States since the implementation of technology in 2005. In Canada, access to the system is limited because of a lack of government funding. The government has been reluctant to fund this technology because robust data, on the true impact to patient care, is lacking. This project will prospectively examine outcomes of women, with early stage endometrial cancer, treated surgically. Open surgery will be compared to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) which will include conventional laparoscopy and robotic surgery. The data collected will include detailed assessment of surgical data, peri-operative events, quality of life analysis, health economic evaluation and evaluation of MIS rates.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2011
Longer than P75 for all trials
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 19, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 29, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2020
CompletedAugust 28, 2020
August 1, 2020
3.7 years
October 19, 2011
August 27, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Surgical Outcomes
Intraoperative complications as well as perioperative (time to discharge from hospital), early postoperative (\<4 weeks) and long-term morbidity (4 weeks to 6 months)
6 months
Quality of Life Outcomes
Validated quality of life questionnaires to assess the time it takes a patient to return to normal activity or work, the effect of surgery on their day-to-day living, pain, body image, sexuality, social life as well as about the costs associated with their surgery.
6 months
Cost-effectiveness
Compare cost-effectiveness between MIS (minimally invasive surgery) and open surgery for early stage endometrial cancer, by evaluating lengths of hospital stay, in hospital costs and out of hospital costs
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Evolution of MIS rates
Prior to recruitment of the first patient and every 6 months for the duration of the study
Study Arms (3)
Laparotomy (open surgery)
Laparoscopic surgery
Robotic assisted surgery
Eligibility Criteria
New patients in the gynecologic oncology clinic will be offered the surgery that is deemed appropriate by their individual surgeon based on the patient's medical and surgical histories, type of malignancy, and the surgeon's expertise in open surgery, laparoscopy and/or robotic surgery.
You may qualify if:
- Any type of histologically confirmed early stage (stage 1 or 2) cancer of the endometrium
- ECOG Performance status of 0-1
- Suitable candidate for surgery
- Signed approved informed consent
- Female, 18 years of age or older
- Pre-operative health is graded as ASA I-III
- Patients able to complete baseline questions either on their own or with assistance
- Patient willing to comply with scheduled visits
You may not qualify if:
- Major abdominal surgery, chemotherapy or radiation within 3 months before the baseline visit
- Evidence of diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis by imaging or clinical exam
- Unfit for surgery: concomitant disorders incompatible with the study or surgery (at the discretion of the investigator)
- Patients who are breastfeeding or become pregnant during the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2, Canada
Kingston General Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, K7L5P9, Canada
Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
Hopital Notre-Dame du CHUM
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1, Canada
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada
Saskatoon Cancer Centre
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 4H4, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marcus Q Bernardini, MD MSc FRCSC
Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 19, 2011
First Posted
November 29, 2011
Study Start
November 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 1, 2015
Study Completion
August 1, 2020
Last Updated
August 28, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08