Impact of Patient Controlled Positive End-expiratory Pressure on Speech in Tracheostomized Ventilated Patients
OptiPEP
Determination of Optimal PEEP Level Under Patient Control in Tracheostomized Ventilated Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
14
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Adequate communication is a major part of the quality of life of tracheostomized ventilator dependent patients. Maintaining speech is therefore major goal in the management of these patients. The use of a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during ventilation has allowed the improvement of speech. The best level for speech may vary from one patient to the other The purpose of this study is to determine individually the most efficient PEEP level in terms of speech while obtaining the most secure condition and the best possible respiratory tolerance. In order to improve the latter, the investigators will use a device which allows the patients to control the activation of PEEP so that they can use it only when needed (i.e. when they wish to speak). The investigators will compare the effect of different PEEP level to try to determine the best compromise to improve speech in tracheostomized ventilator-dependent patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 28, 2011
CompletedNovember 28, 2011
November 1, 2011
1.1 years
November 17, 2011
November 22, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficiency of PEEP level on speech
Measurement of the duration of a text passage reading, the maximal phonation time throughout the repsiratory cycle.
20 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Effect of PEEP level on voice quality
20 minutes
Respiratory Comfort evaluated with a visual analogic scale by patients
20 minutes
Respiratory tolerance
20 minute
Use of PEEP control switch
20 minutes
Study Arms (3)
No PEEP level
ACTIVE COMPARATORprotocol conducted while no PEEP is applied
effective PEEP level (PEEPeff)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPEEP level allowing the entire expiratory volume to go through the upper airways during quiet breathing
intermediate PEEP level (PEEP50)
ACTIVE COMPARATOR50% of PEEPeff
Interventions
positive end expiratory pressure is added to the ventilation mode and it is activated by a switch under patient's control
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patient
- Neuromuscular patients, tracheostomized and on long term ventilation with a cuffless tube
- Assist control volumetric ventilation mode
- Signed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Patients unable to read
- Acute respiratory failure
- Contra-indication of PEEP use
- Lack of social security coverage
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Versailleslead
- Adep Assistancecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hopital Raymond Poincare
Garches, 92380, France
Related Publications (7)
Prigent H, Samuel C, Louis B, Abinun MF, Zerah-Lancner F, Lejaille M, Raphael JC, Lofaso F. Comparative effects of two ventilatory modes on speech in tracheostomized patients with neuromuscular disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Jan 15;167(2):114-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200201-026OC. Epub 2002 Oct 4.
PMID: 12406841BACKGROUNDPrigent H, Garguilo M, Pascal S, Pouplin S, Bouteille J, Lejaille M, Orlikowski D, Lofaso F. Speech effects of a speaking valve versus external PEEP in tracheostomized ventilator-dependent neuromuscular patients. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Oct;36(10):1681-1687. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1935-0. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
PMID: 20535605BACKGROUNDPellegrini N, Pelletier A, Orlikowski D, Lolierou C, Ruquet M, Raphael JC, Lofaso F. Hand versus mouth for call-bell activation by DMD and Becker patients. Neuromuscul Disord. 2007 Jul;17(7):532-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2007.03.016. Epub 2007 May 29.
PMID: 17533130BACKGROUNDBach JR, Alba AS. Tracheostomy ventilation. A study of efficacy with deflated cuffs and cuffless tubes. Chest. 1990 Mar;97(3):679-83. doi: 10.1378/chest.97.3.679.
PMID: 2407453BACKGROUNDHoit JD, Banzett RB, Lohmeier HL, Hixon TJ, Brown R. Clinical ventilator adjustments that improve speech. Chest. 2003 Oct;124(4):1512-21. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.4.1512.
PMID: 14555587BACKGROUNDHoit JD, Shea SA, Banzett RB. Speech production during mechanical ventilation in tracheostomized individuals. J Speech Hear Res. 1994 Feb;37(1):53-63. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3701.53.
PMID: 8170131BACKGROUNDGarguilo M, Leroux K, Lejaille M, Pascal S, Orlikowski D, Lofaso F, Prigent H. Patient-controlled positive end-expiratory pressure with neuromuscular disease: effect on speech in patients with tracheostomy and mechanical ventilation support. Chest. 2013 May;143(5):1243-1251. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0574.
PMID: 23715608DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Helene PRIGENT, MD
Hôpital Raymond Poincaré - APHP
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Frederic LOFASO, MD-PhD
University of Versailles
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr Helene PRIGENT MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2011
First Posted
November 28, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2010
Primary Completion
July 1, 2011
Study Completion
July 1, 2011
Last Updated
November 28, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-11