NCT01477710

Brief Summary

This study will compare three methods of delivering mechanical ventilation using a test lung. Ventilation will be delivered using (1) a mask held in place by a caregiver, (2) a mask strapped to the model using a securing device, and (3) a supraglottic airway. Endpoints include respiratory rate and tidal volume.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2011

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2011

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2011

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 18, 2011

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 22, 2011

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 12, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

September 20, 2024

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

November 18, 2011

Results QC Date

January 23, 2013

Last Update Submit

September 18, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Mechanical ventilationTidal volumeRespiratory rate

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Tidal Volume

    Nurses, respiratory therapists, and physicians will provide mechanical ventilation to a test instrument using three techniques of airway management. Each participant will ventilate the model using each technique for 10 minutes, in random order. During each period, the breath-to-breath tidal volume, respiratory rate, inspiratory flow, inspiratory time, and airway pressure will be recorded.

    10 minutes per technique, for a total of 30 minutes per participant

Study Arms (3)

Hold Mask

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The clinician will connect a SAVe ventilator to a face mask and hold the mask in place on the mannequin with two hands while maintaining the airway on the correct position for 10 minutes.

Procedure: Hold mask

Strap Mask

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The clinician will attach the face mask to the mannequin using the mask and mask strap included in the ventilator kit for 10 minutes

Procedure: Strap Mask

Airway

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The clinician will blindly insert a supralaryngeal airway (the King lT) and connect the SAVe ventilator to the connector and provide ventilation for 10 minutes.

Procedure: Airway

Interventions

Hold maskPROCEDURE

The clinician will connect a SAVe ventilator to a face mask and hold the mask in place on the mannequin with two hands while maintaining the airway on the correct position for 10 minutes.

Hold Mask
Strap MaskPROCEDURE

The clinician will attach the face mask to the mannequin using the mask and mask strap included in the ventilator kit for 10 minutes

Strap Mask
AirwayPROCEDURE

The clinician will blindly insert a supralaryngeal airway (the King lT) and connect the SAVe ventilator to the connector and provide ventilation for 10 minutes.

Airway

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Voluntary participation
  • Nurse, respiratory therapist, or physician
  • involved in the care of patients requiring ventilation and airway management

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Richard Branson
Organization
University of Cincinnati

Study Officials

  • Richard D Branson, MSc RRT

    University of Cincinnati

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor Emeritus

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2011

First Posted

November 22, 2011

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion

September 1, 2011

Study Completion

September 1, 2011

Last Updated

September 20, 2024

Results First Posted

March 12, 2013

Record last verified: 2024-09

Locations