Safety and Efficacy Study for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
A Phase II, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Engensis (VM202) in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
1 other identifier
interventional
104
2 countries
17
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if Engensis (VM202) is safe and effective in treating painful diabetic neuropathy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Aug 2012
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 21, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 12, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 3, 2023
CompletedOctober 6, 2025
August 1, 2025
1.6 years
November 15, 2011
June 12, 2023
September 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Primary Study Endpoint Was the Change in Average 24-hour Pain Score From Baseline to the 6-month Follow-up.
The difference in the mean change of the 24 hour pain score was compared between the treatment groups and the placebo arm to determine treatment effect. The average pain scores were obtained from the Daily Pain and Sleep Interference Diary (recorded daily by subjects for 7 days during Screening prior to the first round of injections and again, before the 6 month follow-up). Subjects rated their 24-hor daily pain intensity according to the 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
seven (7) days before 9 Month visit
Study Arms (3)
Low Dose 16mg Engensis (VM202) and Placebo
ACTIVE COMPARATORintramuscular injections in each calf for a total of 16mg Engensis (VM202): Day 0 - 32 injections / calf 16 injections of 0.5mL of VM202 / calf - (4 mg of VM202 / calf) and 16 injections of normal saline 0.5mL / calf Day 14 - 32 injections / calf and 16 injections of normal saline 0.5mL / calf 16 injections of 0.5mL of VM202 / calf - (4 mg of VM202 / calf)
High Dose 32mg Engensis (VM202)
ACTIVE COMPARATORDay 0 - 32 injections of 0.5mL of VM202 / calf (8 mg of VM202 / calf) Day 14 - 32 injections of 0.5mL of VM202 / calf (8 mg of VM202 / calf) For a total of 32mg VM202
Control - Placebo (normal saline)
PLACEBO COMPARATOR32 injections / calf of 0.5 mL normal saline at Day 0 and Day 14
Interventions
Subjects in the Low Dose Group (8mg VM202 / leg) will receive the following intramuscular injections in each calf: Day 0 - 32 injections / calf: • 16 injections of 0.5mL of VM202 / calf - (4 mg of VM202 / calf) Day 14 - 32 injections / calf: • 16 injections of 0.5mL of VM202 / calf - (4 mg of VM202 / calf)
Subjects in the High Dose Group (16 mg VM202 / leg) will receive the following intramuscular injections in each calf: Day 0 • 32 injections of 0.5mL of VM202 / calf (8 mg of VM202 / calf) Day 14 • 32 injections of 0.5mL of VM202 / calf (8 mg of VM202 / calf)
subjects will receive thirty-two (32) 0.5 mL injections of normal saline on Day 0 and Day 14.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years to ≤ 75 years
- Documented history of Type I or II diabetes with current treatment control (glycosylated hemoglobin A1c of ≤ 10.0% at Screening) and currently on oral medication and/or insulin
- Diagnosis of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in both lower extremities
- Lower extremity pain for at least 6 months
- Visual analog scale (VAS) score of ≥ 40 mm at Initial Screening (0 mm = no pain - 100 mm very severe pain)
- Symptoms from the Brief Pain Neuropathy Screening (BPNS) is ≤ 5 point difference between legs at Initial Screening
- The average daily pain intensity score of the Daily Pain and Sleep Interference Diary completed after medication wash-out is ≥ 4 with a standard deviation ≤ 2
- The physical examination component of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Score (MNSI) is ≥ 3 at Screening
- Stable treatment of diabetes for at least 3 months with no anticipated changes in medication regimen, and no new symptoms associated with diabetes
- If female of childbearing potential, negative urine pregnancy test at screening and using acceptable method of birth control during the study
You may not qualify if:
- Peripheral neuropathy caused by condition other than diabetes
- Other pain more severe than neuropathic pain
- Progressive or degenerative neurological disorder
- Myopathy
- Inflammatory disorder of the blood vessels (inflammatory angiopathy, such as Buerger's disease)
- Active infection
- Chronic inflammatory disease (e.g., Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis)
- Positive HIV or HTLV at Screening
- Active Hepatitis B or C as determined by Hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAB), antibody to Hepatitis B antigen (IgG and IgM; HbsAb), Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and Hepatitis C antibodies (Anti-HCV) at Screening
- Subjects with known immunosuppression or currently receiving immunosuppressive drugs, chemotherapy or radiation therapy
- Stroke or myocardial infarction within last 3 months
- Ophthalmologic conditions pertinent to proliferative retinopathy or conditions that preclude standard ophthalmologic examination
- Uncontrolled hypertension as defined as sustained systolic blood pressure (SBP) \> 200 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) \> 110 mmHg at Screening
- Patients with a recent history (\< 5 years) of or new screening finding of malignant neoplasm except basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (if excised and no evidence of recurrence); patients with family history of colon cancer in any first degree relative are excluded unless they have undergone a colonoscopy in the last 12 months with negative findings
- Subjects requiring \> 81 mg daily of acetylsalicylic acid; If ≥ 81 mg are taken at screening, subjects may be enrolled if willing/able to switch to another medication
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (17)
Diablo Clinical Research
Walnut Creek, California, 94598, United States
Compass Research
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Palm Beach Neurological Center
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, 33418, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
The Neurosciences Institute Albany Medical College
Albany, New York, 12208, United States
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029, United States
University of Oklahoma Harold Hamm Diabetes Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Houston Neurocare
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
The Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States
East Virginia Medical School Strelitz Diabetes Center
Norfolk, Virginia, 23510, United States
Rainier Clinical Research
Seattle, Washington, 98057, United States
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam, Bundang-gu, 463-707, South Korea
Yonsei University College of Medicine Severance Hospital
Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, 120-752, South Korea
Sejong General Hospital
Bucheon-si, Sosa-gu, 422-711, South Korea
The Catholic University of Korea Youido St. Mary's Hospital
Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, 150-713, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Kessler JA, Smith AG, Cha BS, Choi SH, Wymer J, Shaibani A, Ajroud-Driss S, Vinik A; VM202 DPN-II Study Group. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of HGF gene therapy in diabetic neuropathy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2015 May;2(5):465-78. doi: 10.1002/acn3.186. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
PMID: 26000320RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jinsub Lee, PhD.
- Organization
- Helixmith
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jack Kessler, MD
Northwestern University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2011
First Posted
November 21, 2011
Study Start
August 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 12, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 6, 2025
Results First Posted
July 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2025-08