Comparative Outcomes Assessment of the C-Leg With a New Knee Prosthesis
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if transfemoral amputees of varied etiology will demonstrate increased function, safety and quality of life following accommodation with a new knee prosthesis as compared to their former C-Leg knee prosthesis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2011
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 31, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 18, 2014
CompletedDecember 12, 2023
December 1, 2023
2.1 years
May 31, 2011
May 6, 2014
December 7, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
75 Meter Self Selected Walking Test
Time to Complete a 75 meter walking distance.
Based on preliminary experience with the intervention, accommodation can range from 2 weeks to 3 months. Assessment will be scheduled within 2 weeks following accommodation.
Physical Functional Performance (Continuous Scale; 10-items)
Simulation of 10 activities of daily living (i.e. donning a shirt, sweeping, walking stairs). Measured in units of time, distance and mass to provide a singular, continuous scaled score of function (from 0-100). A score of 100 is the maximal score and indicates the highest level of independent function where a score of 0 indicates the poorest score. Persons scoring lower scores will likely be at increased risk of dependency with daily function.
Accommodation with knee systems is approximately 90 days. This test takes less than 1hr to complete.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Balance and Stability
Based on preliminary experience with the intervention, accommodation can range from 2 weeks to 3 months. Assessment will be scheduled within 2 weeks following accommodation.
Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire: Utility Score.
Based on preliminary experience with the intervention, accommodation can range from 2 weeks to 3 months. Assessment will be scheduled within 2 weeks following accommodation.
Study Arms (3)
Prosthetic knee 1 (Otto Bock C-Leg)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis arm included unilateral transfemoral amputees who were assessed while using their preferred knee at study start(C-Leg). The Otto Bock C-Leg is a microprocessor knee using 2 sensors (1 for kinetics and 1 for kinematics).
Prosthetic knee 2 (Otto Bock Genium)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis arm included unilateral transfemoral amputees who were assessed while using the experimental/study knee, the Genium. The Otto Bock Genium is a microprocessor knee using multiple sensors that hypothetically increase mobility functions (e.g. walking backwards, intuitive stance)
Non-amputee controls
NO INTERVENTIONThis was an observational arm including non-amputees who were assessed as non-impaired control subjects. There are no interventions in this observational arm of the study.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Unilateral transfemoral or knee-disarticulation amputee
- to 85 years of age
- K3 (variable cadence and community) ambulators;
- Current use of and experience with the C-Leg for at least 1 year
- Ability to descend stairs and hills without caregiver and assistive devices
- Be able to independently provide informed consent
- Be willing to comply with study procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- History of chronic skin breakdown on the residual limb
- Conditions that would prevent participation and pose increased risk (e.g. unstable cardiovascular conditions that preclude physical activity such as walking)
- Use of any assistive devices/walking aids, beyond a prosthesis, to ambulate
- Unwillingness/inability to follow instructions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Jason Highsmithlead
- Otto Bock Healthcarecollaborator
- Florida High Tech Corridor Councilcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- M. Jason Highsmith
- Organization
- University of South Florida
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
M. Jason Highsmith, PT,DPT,CP
University of South Florida
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 31, 2011
First Posted
November 17, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
February 1, 2013
Last Updated
December 12, 2023
Results First Posted
November 18, 2014
Record last verified: 2023-12