Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) Versus PFNA Augmentation
Comparison of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) Versus PFNA Augmentation for the Treatment of Closed Unstable Trochanteric Fractures - A Randomized-controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
251
6 countries
9
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether patients with trochanteric fractures being treated with a Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) and augmentation can better be mobilized than patients without augmentation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Feb 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_4
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 10, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2016
CompletedAugust 13, 2020
July 1, 2018
3.8 years
November 10, 2011
August 11, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mobility measured with the "timed up & go"-test during hospital stay.
The TUG measures the time (in seconds) that it takes for an individual to rise from an armchair (chair seat height = 45 cm / 1.5 feet), walk 3 meters (= 10 feet) to a line drawn on the floor, turn around and return to the chair. The time is measured from a seated position (back against the backrest) with a stopwatch started on the command "ready - go" and stopped when the seat position is reached again. Patient-perceived pain and exertion will be assessed after the test.
5 to 7 days postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Description of surgical details as surgery time and fluoroscopy time, and of augmentation details (PFNA Augmentation group only).
Intraoperative
Pain
one year
Duration of hospital stay
one year
Walking ability
one year
Return to pre-fracture residential status
one year
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
PFNA
ACTIVE COMPARATORProximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA Synthes)
PFNA Augmentation
ACTIVE COMPARATORProximal Femoral Nail Antirotation PFNA Augmentation (Synthes) with Traumacem V+ Synthes
Interventions
Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) Augmentation (with Traumacem V+)
Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 75 years and older
- Closed unstable trochanteric fracture: AO 31 - A2 and A3
- Low energy trauma (e.g.fall from standing height)
- Definitive fracture fixation within 72 hrs. after admission
- Indication for PFNA fixation (with or without augmentation)
- Ability to walk independently (walking aids are allowed) prior to injury
- Signed written informed consent and agreement to attend the planned FUs
- Able to understand and read country national language at an elementary level
You may not qualify if:
- Pathologic fracture
- Polytrauma
- Any additional fracture
- Open fracture
- Recent history of substance abuse (ie, recreational drugs, alcohol) that would preclude reliable assessment
- Active malignancy defined as history of invasive malignancy, except if the patient has received treatment and displayed no clinical signs and symptoms for at least five years
- ASA class V and VI
- Any implant at the same hip
- Hemiplegia
- Patients with legal guardian
- Patients who have participated in any other device or drug related clinical trial that could influence the results of the present study within the previous month
- Fractures and injuries opening into the articulation and vascular structure
- Infection
- Patients with clotting disorders
- Patients with severe cardiac and / or pulmonary insufficiency
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (9)
Medical University of Innsbruck
Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
KUL Univ. Ziekenhuizen Leuven
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
BGU Tübingen
Tübingen, 72076, Germany
University of Ulm
Ulm, 89075, Germany
Sophien und Hufeland Klinikum GmbH
Weimar, 99425, Germany
Hadassah Medical Organization
Jerusalem, 91120, Israel
Sykehuset i Vestfold HF Tønsberg
Tønsberg, 3103, Norway
Cantonal Hospital Lucerne
Lucerne, 6000, Switzerland
City Hospital Waid
Zurich, 8037, Switzerland
Related Publications (1)
Kammerlander C, Hem ES, Klopfer T, Gebhard F, Sermon A, Dietrich M, Bach O, Weil Y, Babst R, Blauth M. Cement augmentation of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) - A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Injury. 2018 Aug;49(8):1436-1444. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.022. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
PMID: 29724590RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Andreas Faeh
AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation, Davos, Switzerland
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christian Kammerlander, MD
Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 10, 2011
First Posted
November 17, 2011
Study Start
February 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 13, 2020
Record last verified: 2018-07