Treatment to Enhance Cognition in Bipolar Disorder
TREC-BD
Efficacy of a Cognitive Remediation Treatment Program for Bipolar Disorder
2 other identifiers
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the present study is to evaluate a neuroplasticity-oriented, computer-based cognitive remediation treatment program in patients with bipolar disorder and its effects on cognitive deficits and community functioning compared to an active, computer-based control.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 11, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 26, 2020
CompletedSeptember 28, 2021
August 1, 2021
5.2 years
July 11, 2011
January 11, 2018
August 30, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)
The Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) battery includes 10 tasks that are designed to measure seven key cognitive domains: processing speed, attention, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, problem solving and social cognition. These scores are also combined to yield a cognitive Composite. All subtest, domain, and composite scores are reported in standardized T scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10; higher scores reflect better performance. For example, a score of 60 on any subtest, domain, or the Composite would represent a score 1 standard deviation above than the mean. All standardized scores are computed by the MCCB scoring software included in the testing battery, and are normed by age and sex. Total administration time is 60-90 minutes.
within 1 week prior to initiating intervention; midpoint - on average 8 weeks after initiation; post-treatment - on average 24 weeks after initiation; after 6 months no active intervention
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
within 1 week prior to initiating intervention; midpoint - on average after 8 weeks of initiation; post-treatment - on average 24 weeks after initiation; after 6 months of no active study intervention
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
within 1 week prior to initiating intervention; midpoint - on average after 8 weeks of initiation; post-treatment - on average 24 weeks after initiation; after 6 months of no active study intervention
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
within 1 week prior to initiating intervention; midpoint - on average after 8 weeks of initiation; post-treatment - on average 24 weeks after initiation; after 6 months of no active study intervention
Multnomah Community Ability Scale (MCAS)
within 1 week prior to initiating intervention; midpoint - on average after 8 weeks of initiation; post-treatment - on average 24 weeks after initiation; after 6 months of no active study intervention
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale
within 1 week prior to initiating intervention; midpoint - on average after 8 weeks of initiation; post-treatment - on average 24 weeks after initiation; after 6 months of no active study intervention
Other Outcomes (1)
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) (Optional)
within 1 week prior to initiating intervention; post-treatment - on average 24 weeks after initiation
Study Arms (2)
Cognitive Remediation
EXPERIMENTALThis arm will receive computer-based cognitive remediation treatment 3 times per week for 24 weeks, for a total of 70 hours of treatment
Computer Control
PLACEBO COMPARATORGroup will receive 70 hours of computer time playing pre-selected computer games administered in a similar format as the Cognitive Remediation condition
Interventions
13 programs targeting cognition in 4 separate domains: Auditory processing, visual processing, social cognition, and executive functioning. Games are imbedded in a format that is engaging and interactive. Animated characters serve as "directors" for each program, explaining the tasks in both verbal and written formats and providing feedback on each trial and overall after each activity. Users move systematically through the programs and can track their progress as the go. Each session includes activities from several different games to maintain interest and train a variety of skills; however, games are presented in the order of domains listed above (i.e. auditory, then visual, then social, and finally executive) to avoid stimulus interference during the training.
Sessions will involve generic computer games administered via the game interface "Sporcle." Sporcle is a game site that offers a collection of quiz-type activities available on line. The activities include typing, basic timed arithmetic (e.g. simple addition); picture identification (e.g. name the corporate logo; name the sitcom), and subject-based quizzes in areas like history (e.g. name the US presidents), geography (e.g. name the state capitals), and literature (e.g. book title fill-in-the-blank). An administrator can track the activity of subjects including when they logged in, which games they played and for how long, and what their accuracy was on each game. We will use a pre-developed game schedule that includes a mix of each type of game in each session, and ensures that subjects are playing the same games in the same order. This format was developed to mirror the treatment condition, as subjects are given a variety of specific games to play at each session.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of BD with psychosis
- Positive and Negative syndrome Scale (PANSS) \< 75; PANSS Psychosis item scores = 3 or under; Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) = 6 or under
- Age between 18 and 50
- Within 10 years of illness onset
- Legal and mental competency of the participant
You may not qualify if:
- Age under 18 or over 50
- PANSS \>75; PANSS Psychosis item scores \>3; YMRS \> 6
- Legal or mental incompetence (legal incompetence defined by any guardianship (including of person or treatment guardianship); mental incompetence defined by failure of the informed consent survey)
- Psychiatric inpatient status at time of enrollment
- Delirium secondary to medical illness
- Psychotic or mood disorder due to general medical or neurological illness
- History of head trauma
- History of seizure disorder or photo-sensitive seizures
- Use of anticholinergic medication, clozapine or olanzapine at baseline
- Rapid-cycling bipolar disorder
- Diagnosis of current substance abuse (past month) or substance dependence within the past year.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mclean Hospitallead
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
McLean Hospital
Belmont, Massachusetts, 02478, United States
Related Publications (2)
Lewandowski KE, Sperry SH, Cohen BM, Norris LA, Fitzmaurice GM, Ongur D, Keshavan MS. Treatment to Enhance Cognition in Bipolar Disorder (TREC-BD): Efficacy of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Cognitive Remediation Versus Active Control. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Nov/Dec;78(9):e1242-e1249. doi: 10.4088/JCP.17m11476.
PMID: 29045770DERIVEDLewandowski KE, Sperry SH, Ongur D, Cohen BM, Norris LA, Keshavan MS. Cognitive remediation versus active computer control in bipolar disorder with psychosis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Mar 12;17(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1275-7.
PMID: 26969299DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Kathryn Lewandowski
- Organization
- McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kathryn E Lewandowski, Ph.D.
Mclean Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- assessment staff, investigator, and participants blind to group membership.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Psychologist/Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2011
First Posted
November 11, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion
August 1, 2016
Study Completion
August 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 28, 2021
Results First Posted
February 26, 2020
Record last verified: 2021-08