Breast and Abdominal Related Morbidity of DIEP and SIEA Flaps
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Breast and Abdominal Related Morbidity of DIEP and SIEA Flaps
1 other identifier
interventional
91
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator flap (DIEP) is the current standard of care in breast reconstruction. The newer Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery flap (SIEA) is felt to be an improvement as it does not damage the abdominal wall. The SIEA unfortunately has smaller vessels which put the flap at a higher risk of developing flap loss and fat necrosis. The uncertainty regarding the tradeoffs inherent in the choice of procedure has not been resolved. As such the investigators aim to perform a randomized single blinded trial to evaluate the abdominal and breast related morbidity associated with DIEP and SIEA flaps.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 23, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 10, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedNovember 6, 2018
August 1, 2014
4.8 years
October 23, 2011
November 5, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in objective isokinetic abdominal strength
Strength of the abdominal muscles and the back extensors is being objectively measured by isokinetic strength testing on an isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex System III with dual position back extension/flexion attachment). The abdominal strength testing is being performed pre-operatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months post-op. Objective measurements are used to address the strength of the rectus abdominus muscle and all data is collected by personnel at PanAn Clinic who have been trained in the required techniques. The technician performing the assessments is blinded to the type of breast reconstruction that has been performed.
pre-operative (baseline), 3, 6 and 12 months post-operative
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Breast-Q questionnaire
pre-operative (baseline) and 3 and 12 months post-operative
Fat Necrosis
3 and 6 months post-operative
Seroma Rate and Drainage Volumes
1 week post-op, 2 weeks post-op, 6-8 weeks post-op and 3 months post-op
Flap Loss
1 week post-op, 2 weeks post-op, 6-8 weeks post-op and 3 months post-op
Abdominal Wound Breakdown
1 week post-op, 2 weeks post-op, 6-8 weeks post-op and 3 months post-op
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
DIEP flap group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe standard of care for the patient population is the DIEP or SIEA flap breast reconstruction. Currently the single operating surgeon in the study will always try to perform a SIEA flap reconstruction. If the anatomy does not allow it he will convert to a DIEP flap. The majority of breast surgeons in North America will generally perform a DIEP flap initially. The proposed study does not alter the standard of care received.
SIEA flap group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe standard of care for the patient population is the DIEP or SIEA flap breast reconstruction. Currently the single operating surgeon in the study will always try to perform a SIEA flap reconstruction. If the anatomy does not allow it he will convert to a DIEP flap. The majority of breast surgeons in North America will generally perform a DIEP flap initially. The proposed study does not alter the standard of care received.
Interventions
DIEP stands for deep inferior epigastric perforator. This is the name of the main blood vessel that runs through the abdominal tissue that will be used to reconstruct the breast. In DIEP flap reconstruction, only skin, fat, and blood vessels are removed from the lower belly (the abdomen between the waist and hips). No muscle is removed.
The SIEA flap is very similar to the DIEP flap procedure. Both techniques use the lower abdominal skin and fatty tissue to reconstruct a natural, soft breast following mastectomy. The main difference between the SIEA flap and the DIEP flap is the artery used to supply blood flow to the new breast. The SIEA blood vessels are found in the fatty tissue just below skin whereas the DIEP blood vessels run below and within the abdominal muscle (making the surgery more technically challenging). While the surgical preparation is slightly different, both procedures spare the abdominal muscle and only use the patient's skin and fat to reconstruct the breast.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- female subject older than 18
- with satisfactory abdominal tissue for DIEP and SIEA flap reconstruction
- fluent in English
You may not qualify if:
- reconstruction planned using latissimus dorsi flap, gluteal artery perforator flap or tissue expansion
- suffer from neurological back problems
- suffer form inguinal hernias
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Manitobalead
- Keeping Abreast Charitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Health Sciences Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 149, Canada
Related Publications (5)
Selber JC, Fosnot J, Nelson J, Goldstein J, Bergey M, Sonnad S, Serletti JM. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: Part II. Bilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov;126(5):1438-1453. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ea42ed.
PMID: 21042100BACKGROUNDSelber JC, Nelson J, Fosnot J, Goldstein J, Bergey M, Sonnad SS, Serletti JM. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: part I. unilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Oct;126(4):1142-1153. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f02520.
PMID: 20885239BACKGROUNDFutter CM, Webster MH, Hagen S, Mitchell SL. A retrospective comparison of abdominal muscle strength following breast reconstruction with a free TRAM or DIEP flap. Br J Plast Surg. 2000 Oct;53(7):578-83. doi: 10.1054/bjps.2000.3427.
PMID: 11000074BACKGROUNDBlondeel N, Vanderstraeten GG, Monstrey SJ, Van Landuyt K, Tonnard P, Lysens R, Boeckx WD, Matton G. The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1997 Jul;50(5):322-30. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(97)90540-3.
PMID: 9245865BACKGROUNDBonde CT, Lund H, Fridberg M, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Elberg JJ. Abdominal strength after breast reconstruction using a free abdominal flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(5):519-23. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.07.003. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
PMID: 17399661BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Blair R Peters, BSc
University of Manitoba Faculty of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2011
First Posted
November 10, 2011
Study Start
February 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
November 6, 2018
Record last verified: 2014-08