NCT01467128

Brief Summary

The next four decades will see a marked expansion of the elderly population in Ireland, in particular people aged over 80 yrs. Persons aged over 80 are the highest consumers of prescription medicines in Ireland and have the highest prevalence rates of major polypharmacy. Polypharmacy is intimately linked with serious adverse drug events (ADEs) and consequent major morbidity and mortality. Epidemiological data from the Unites States indicate that ADEs is the fifth most common cause of death nationally. Experts suggest that effective evidence based interventions can be applied to this major public health problem. A recently described approach to hospitalised older patients' medication optimisation is that of Spinewine and colleagues at Louvain University, Belgium. In this model, a pharmacist with expertise in geriatric pharmacotherapy routinely reviews the prescriptions of older patients from admission to discharge. The pharmacist provides a detailed pharmaceutical care plan for older patients and their carers where appropriate as well as feedback information to prescribers in the event of detecting instances of probable medication inappropriateness. Whenever an opportunity for medication optimisation is identified, the pharmacist discusses the opportunity with the prescriber who can accept or reject the intervention. At discharge from hospital, the pharmacist also provides written and verbal information on treatment changes to the patient / caregiver and GP. The intervention therefore represents a comprehensive pharmaceutical care approach that is based upon careful review and subsequent consensus on individualised pharmacotherapy. In an RCT comparison of this approach with standard care, older patients in the intervention arm of the study had significant improvements in medication appropriateness (medication appropriateness index (MAI), Beers' criteria, and Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE) criteria.). Expert pharmacist review of older peoples' medication in hospital is a proven intervention in term of reducing inappropriateness of medication.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
720

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2011

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2011

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 2, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 8, 2011

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

June 6, 2012

Status Verified

June 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

September 2, 2011

Last Update Submit

June 5, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

ElderlyHospitalAdverse DrugPharmacistPrevention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of patients with definite and possible adverse drug events during their hospital admission

    From point of randomization to Day 14

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Drug ingredient cost at hospital discharge

    Up to Day 14

  • Medication Appropriateness Index score

    measured at Day 14 and again at three months post hospital discharge.

  • Composite health resource utilization including hospital admissions and primary care consultations

    Measured at 3 months post hospital discharge

Study Arms (2)

Structured expert pharmacist review

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Other: Structured expert pharmacist review

Normal pharmaceutical care in hospital

NO INTERVENTION
Other: No Intervention

Interventions

The researcher will apply the pharmacist intervention to the cases randomised to this arm of the study. This consists of an expert pharmacist review of the patients prescribed medications at the time of recruitment into the study. Recommendations following the intervention will be communicated both verbally and in writing to the medical team with primary responsibility for the patient. Recommendations arising from the intervention will be printed out and inserted into the patients' notes, in addition to the relevant registrar being informed in person or via the telephone.

Also known as: expert pharmacist review
Structured expert pharmacist review

Normal hospital pharmaceutical care

Normal pharmaceutical care in hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients aged 65 years and over presenting to CUH Accident and Emergency Departments with acute illness for admission under a medical team will be eligible for the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Age less than 65 years.
  • Patient to be admitted under the care of a Geriatrician Psychiatrist of Old Age or Clinical Pharmacologist, or having been admitted under these services or attended their outpatient clinics in the previous 12 months. (These doctor groups are likely to minimise inappropriate medications in this population).
  • Terminally ill patient attended by palliative care team.
  • Critically ill patient e.g. admitted to Intensive Care Unit.
  • Patients who do not wish to participate in the study.
  • Patients whose hospital physician does not wish to participate in the study ver, its efficacy in terms of ADE prevention is not yet demonstrated.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cork University Hospital

Cork, Munster, Ireland

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Spinewine A, Dhillon S, Mallet L, Tulkens PM, Wilmotte L, Swine C. Implementation of ward-based clinical pharmacy services in Belgium--description of the impact on a geriatric unit. Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Apr;40(4):720-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G515. Epub 2006 Mar 28.

    PMID: 16569792BACKGROUND
  • Spinewine A, Swine C, Dhillon S, Lambert P, Nachega JB, Wilmotte L, Tulkens PM. Effect of a collaborative approach on the quality of prescribing for geriatric inpatients: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 May;55(5):658-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01132.x.

    PMID: 17493184BACKGROUND
  • Hamilton H, Gallagher P, Ryan C, Byrne S, O'Mahony D. Potentially inappropriate medications defined by STOPP criteria and the risk of adverse drug events in older hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jun 13;171(11):1013-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.215.

    PMID: 21670370BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Chemically-Induced Disorders

Study Officials

  • David O'Sullivan, MPharm

    University College Cork, Ireland

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2011

First Posted

November 8, 2011

Study Start

June 1, 2011

Primary Completion

June 1, 2012

Study Completion

June 1, 2012

Last Updated

June 6, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-06

Locations