Improving the Understanding of the Response to Vitamin D Supplementation
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
It is the investigators hypothesis that the current method of evaluating vitamin D status, measuring circulating 25-hydroxy vitamin D is not providing the full metabolic picture, and is therefore inadequate. The investigators liken this concept to the evolution of cholesterol where initially, total cholesterol was the only measurement, and have since determined the importance of HDL, LDL and triglycerides in evaluating patient status. Similarly, the investigators feel measurement of other vitamin D components such as sulfated vitamin D, circulating vitamin D3 and 3-epi 25-hydroxy vitamin D will offer more comprehensive information about a patient's vitamin D status. It is our overarching hypothesis that a "vitamin D assay panel," will enhance understanding of vitamin D status. It is our expectation that the enhanced understanding based on improved measurement capability will ultimately translate to improved definition of vitamin D status and need for supplementation on an individual level.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Dec 2011
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 27, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 4, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 25, 2016
CompletedNovember 25, 2016
October 1, 2016
3 years
October 27, 2011
August 3, 2016
October 4, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Serum 25-hydroxy Vitamin D3
Our primary outcome variable is the effect of supplementation on change in serum 25(OH)D3;
Baseline, 1 and 4 months post supplementation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Parameters of the Vitamin D Assay Panel
Baseline, 1 and 4 months post supplementation
Study Arms (2)
2000 IU vitamin D3
ACTIVE COMPARATORCholecalciferol 2,000 IU capsules
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORNon-matching placebo, gelatin filled capsules
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy, community-dwelling ambulatory postmenopausal White, non-Hispanic women
- Able and willing to sign informed consent
- Baseline serum 25(OH)D concentration of 10-29 ng/mL
- Willing to not alter the amount of their baseline vitamin D supplementation during the course of this study
- Willing to use sunscreen (SPF ≥15) when sun exposure of \> 15 minutes is expected
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of any measurable circulating 25(OH)D2 on screening measurement
- Current hypercalcemia (serum calcium \> 10.5 mg/dl) or untreated primary hyperparathyroidism
- History of nephrolithiasis
- Known risk factors for hypercalcemia, e.g., malignancy, tuberculosis, sarcoidosis
- History of any form of cancer within the past five years with the exception of adequately treated squamous cell or basal cell skin carcinoma
- Renal failure; defined as a calculated creatinine clearance (using the Cockroft-Gault approach) of ≤ 35 ml/minute
- Severe end-organ disease, e.g., cardiovascular, hepatic, hematologic, pulmonary, etc., which might limit the ability to complete this study
- Known metabolic bone disease, e.g., Paget's disease, osteomalacia
- Treatment with any drug known to interfere with vitamin D metabolism, e.g., phenytoin, phenobarbital
- Treatment with high dose vitamin D (≥ 50,000 IU weekly) or any active metabolites of vitamin D, e.g., calcitriol, within six months of screening
- Use of tanning beds or salons or unwillingness to utilize sunscreen during periods of sun exposure of 15 minutes or longer
- Planned trips/vacations likely to be associated with substantial amounts of sun exposure during the course of the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Wisconsin, Madisonlead
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Neil Binkley
- Organization
- University of Wisconsin
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Neil Binkley, M.D.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 27, 2011
First Posted
November 4, 2011
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 25, 2016
Results First Posted
November 25, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10