Orbital Fractures Measurement: Intraoperative Versus Computed Tomography (CT) Scan
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Purpose to compare the orbital fracture size measured by orbital CT scan and compare it to the actual orbital fracture size intraoperatively in patients who needed surgical intervention to correct the fracture. Hypothesis: there is difference between the CT measure fracture size and the actual intraoperative size.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 3, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2017
CompletedSeptember 8, 2016
September 1, 2016
5.7 years
October 18, 2011
September 7, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patients with orbital fractures that require surgical repair will have their fracture"s" size measured intraoperatively by a ruler and/or a caliper in millimeters and compare it to the size measured by the CT scan.
Patients with orbital fractures that need to be operated. Their intraoperative fracture size will be measured by the orbital surgeon by a ruler or/and a caliper in millimeters. Size on CT scan is determined by counting the number of slides that show the fracture (for anteropsterior fracture we measure the number of coronal sections that show the fracture multiply X1-each section is 1millimeter thickness, and so on for mediolateral fractures we measure saggital sections number and for superoinferior fractures the axial sections that show the fracture.
2 years
Study Arms (1)
orbital fractures size
EXPERIMENTALpatients who undergo surgical repair of orbital fracture with measuring the fracture size intraoperatively and had available orbital Ct scan preoperatively.
Interventions
comparing actual intraoperative fracture size to the CT fracture size
comparing intraoperative fracture size to the CT orbital fracture size
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- With orbital fracture (trauma) proved by CT scan and need operative repair.
- Agree to participate.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients that refuse to be included in the study.
- Under the age of 18 years.
- CT not performed or not available.
- Not qualified to sign the consent form.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
HaEmek medical center
Afula, North, 18101, Israel
HaEme Medical center, Dept of Ophthalmology
Afula, 18101, Israel
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel Briscoe, MD
Chairperson, dept. of ophthalmology, haemek medical center, afula 18101, Israel
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Wasseem Hilo, MD
Resident, ophthalmology dept, Haemek Medical Center, Afula 18101, Israel
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2011
First Posted
November 3, 2011
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
August 1, 2017
Study Completion
August 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 8, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09