Web-based Support to Manage Arthritis Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
228
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Development of an interactive, online pain self-management program for adults who suffer from pain associated with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, Ankylosing spondylitis, and other arthritic conditions (e.g., psoriatic arthritis) using principles from Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, 1977). This online health intervention, painACTION: Arthritis, will provide clinically reliable information about diagnosis, treatment, and management of arthritis, written for health consumers in a clear and engaging manner to help increase their skills and confidence to use self-management strategies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Sep 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 20, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2012
CompletedDecember 10, 2012
December 1, 2012
1.2 years
October 20, 2011
December 7, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in cognitions from baseline to: post intervention (approximately 1 month post baseline), 3 months post intervention, 6 months post intervention
Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale (Lorig et al., 1989) is an 8-item questionnaire that assesses a patient's ability to determine self-efficacy. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) (Sullivan et al., 1995) was developed to assess three components of catastrophizing: rumination, magnification, and helplessness. The scale consists of 13 items rated from 0-4 (0 = not at all, 4 = all the time). Pain Awareness Questionnaire (Berman et al., 2009) is a 7-item questionnaire that assesses a patient's awareness of their current pain.
baseline, post intervention, 3 months post intervention, and 6 months post intervention
Change in self management behaviors from baseline to: post intervention post intervention (approximately 1 month post baseline), 3 months post intervention, 6 months post intervention
Exercise Behaviors (Lorig et al., 1996) is a 6-item questionnaire assessing the total time a patient had participated in various forms of exercise (e.g., stretching). Cognitive Symptom Management (Lorig et al., 1996) is a 6-item questionnaire assessing a patient's ability to manage their symptoms. This scale is rated on a 0 to 5 scale: 0 = never to 5 = always. Communication with Physicians (Lorig et al., 1996) is a 3-item scale assessing a patient's communication with their physicians. This scale is rated on a 0 to 5 scale: 0 = never to 5 = always.
baseline, post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention
Change in pain and functioning from baseline to: post intervention post intervention (approximately 1 month post baseline), 3 months post intervention, 6 months post intervention
Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) (Cleeland, 1991) uses a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale to obtain information on the intensity of pain, the degree to which pain interferes with function, pain relief, pain quality, and the patient's perception of the cause of pain (6 items).
baseline, post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in quality of life from baseline to: post intervention post intervention (approximately 1 month post baseline), 3 months post intervention, 6 months post intervention
baseline, post intervention, 3 months post intervention, and 6 months post intervention
Change in affect from baseline to: post intervention post intervention (approximately 1 month post baseline), 3 months post intervention, 6 months post intervention
baseline, post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention
Study Arms (2)
painACTION: Arthritis
EXPERIMENTALtreatment as usual
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
Participants will be asked to complete eight 20-minute sessions on the site over a four-week intervention period (two site visits per week), and complete five 20-minute "booster" sessions (one site visit per month) during the follow up period. Each session will have a minimum set of requirements. Specific details about the requirements for each session will be provided in the session logs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be at least 18 years of age;
- Be able to provide informed consent
- Be able to read and speak English
- Have reliable Internet access and e-mail
- Have a self-reported doctor diagnosis of arthritis, limited to the following conditions - osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), or other arthritis conditions (e.g., psoriatic arthritis)
- Have a self-reported pain level of 4 or more in the past week on the 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale (McCaffery \& Beebe, 1993) because 4 indicates moderate or higher level of pain.
You may not qualify if:
- Participation in another Inflexxion pain management study.
- Participation in an online research study related to arthritis in the past year
- Currently in pain from a recent injury
- Has been hospitalized for non-medical reasons related to emotional or mental health in the past year
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Inflexxion, Inc.lead
Study Sites (1)
Inflexxion, Inc.
Newton, Massachusetts, 02459, United States
Related Publications (11)
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191. No abstract available.
PMID: 847061BACKGROUNDLorig K, Chastain RL, Ung E, Shoor S, Holman HR. Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1989 Jan;32(1):37-44. doi: 10.1002/anr.1780320107.
PMID: 2912463BACKGROUNDLorig K, Stewart A, Ritter P, González V, Laurent D, Lynch J. Outcome measures for health education and other health care interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996.
BACKGROUNDSullivan MJL. The pain catastrophizing scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment 7(4):524-532, 1995.
BACKGROUNDBerman RL, Iris MA, Bode R, Drengenberg C. The effectiveness of an online mind-body intervention for older adults with chronic pain. J Pain. 2009 Jan;10(1):68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.07.006. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
PMID: 18774342BACKGROUNDCleeland CS. Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form). Pain Research Group. Retrieved March 17, 2009, from http://prc.coh.org/pdf/BPI%20Short%20Version.pdf, 1991.
BACKGROUNDGuillemin F, Coste J, Pouchot J, Ghezail M, Bregeon C, Sany J. The AIMS2-SF: a short form of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2. French Quality of Life in Rheumatology Group. Arthritis Rheum. 1997 Jul;40(7):1267-74. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199707)40:73.0.CO;2-L.
PMID: 9214427BACKGROUNDGuillemin F, Challier B, Urlacher F, Vancon G, Pourel J. Quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis: validation of the ankylosing spondylitis Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2, a modified Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Questionnaire. Arthritis Care Res. 1999 Jun;12(3):157-62. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199906)12:33.0.co;2-r.
PMID: 10513505BACKGROUNDGuy W. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1976.
BACKGROUNDLovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995 Mar;33(3):335-43. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u.
PMID: 7726811BACKGROUNDMcCaffery M, Beebe A. Pain: Clinical Manual for Nursing Practice. Baltimore: V.V. Mosby Company, 1993.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kimberlee J Trudeau, Ph.D.
Inflexxion, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 20, 2011
First Posted
November 1, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
November 1, 2012
Study Completion
November 1, 2012
Last Updated
December 10, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-12