Comparison of Door-to-door Versus Community Gathering to Provide HIV Counseling and Testing Services in Rural Lesotho
DoDoPi
Comparing Door-to-door Versus Community Gathering in Providing HIV Counseling and Testing Within an Integrated Primary Health Care Package: a Cluster Randomized Trial in Rural Lesotho
1 other identifier
interventional
1,800
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is to determine if door-to-door is more effective than community gathering in providing voluntary HIV counseling and testing (VCT) in communities in rural Lesotho. The voluntary HIV counseling and testing will be proposed as an integrated part of a package of proposed services. The package consists of: Blood-pressure measurement, blood-glucose measurement, Body-mass-index (adults), weight for height (children), catch-up vaccinations, deworming (children) Vitamin A (children \& young women), family planning for eligible women, Tuberculosis screening and HIV counseling and testing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2011
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 25, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2012
CompletedFebruary 9, 2012
February 1, 2012
4 months
October 18, 2011
February 8, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Proportion of newly tested HIV-positive clients over all clients tested for HIV during the campaigns
Proportion refers to the proportion of newly tested HIV-positive clients among all clients tested for HIV during the voluntary counselling and testing campaigns in each arm.
Proportion of clients newly tested HIV-positive who enrolled into HIV/AIDS care within one month over all clients newly tested HIV-positive during the campaigns
One month after the campaigns, enrollment of clients who newly tested HIV-positive at the campaign is assessed at the facilities based on the clinics' registers.
4 weeks after tested positive
Overall number newly tested HIV-positive and enrolled into chronic HIV/AIDS-care at each facility
Between the two study-arms, the overall numbers will be compared in two ways: 1. Total number positively tested and enrolled into care at the facility during the month after the campaign (this refers to the overall number at facility-level. Irrespective if these patients were tested during one of the campaigns or during routine activities at the facility) 2. Total number positively tested and enrolled into care from the 5 villages where campaigns were held as compared to the five villages where no campaigns were held.
4 weeks after campaign
Absolute number of newly tested HIV-positive clients
Refers to the overall number newly tested HIV-positive during the campaigns in both arms
Absolute number of clients newly tested HIV-positive who enrolled into HIV/AIDS care
This refers to the absolute number newly tested HIV-positive during the campaigns who enrolled thereafter into chronic HIV/AIDS care within one month
4 weeks after tested HIV-positive
Secondary Outcomes (10)
CD4-count among clients newly tested HIV-positive
Clinical WHO-stage among clients newly tested HIV-positive
Proportion of clients screened positive for Tuberculosis during the campaigns
Proportion of first-time HIV-testers among all clients accessing the testing services
Proportion of clients with positive tuberculosis screening who return 3 sputum-bottles within ≤ 5 days to the facility
5 days after the campaign was held
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Door-to-Door
EXPERIMENTALHealth care workers propose the integrated service package including VCT at the peoples' homes.
Pitso
ACTIVE COMPARATORHealth care workers propose the integrated service package including VCT through community gatherings ("pitso").
control
NO INTERVENTIONWithin each cluster (catchment area of a health center), five villages are randomly chosen as comparators on cluster level. These villages get no particular intervention (VCT-campaign). However, routine services continue to be provided. These villages serve as a control for the third primary outcome that assesses the overall numbers newly enrolled into chronic HIV/AIDS care at facility-level.
Interventions
Health workers propose the integrated service package including VCT at the peoples' homes (home-based testing).
Health care workers propose the integrated service package including VCT through community gatherings ("Pitso").
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Not already known to be HIV-positive
- Resident in the catchment area of the health center where the campaign is conducted
- Provision of written informed consent to participate (signed by writing or fingerprint)
- In case of children: Provision of written informed consent by an adult care-taker
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- SolidarMedlead
- Paray Mission Hospital, Thaba-Tsekacollaborator
- Seboche Hospital, Botha-Bothecollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Seboche Hospital
Seboche, Botha-Bothe, P.O. 304, Lesotho
Paray Hospital
Thaba-Tseka, Thaba-Tseka, Lesotho
Related Publications (1)
Labhardt ND, Motlomelo M, Cerutti B, Pfeiffer K, Kamele M, Hobbins MA, Ehmer J. Home-based versus mobile clinic HIV testing and counseling in rural Lesotho: a cluster-randomized trial. PLoS Med. 2014 Dec 16;11(12):e1001768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001768. eCollection 2014 Dec.
PMID: 25513807DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Motlomelo Masetsibi
SolidarMed
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Niklaus Labhardt, MD, MIH
SolidarMed
- STUDY CHAIR
Karolin Pfeiffer, MD, McommH
SolidarMed
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Project Manager
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2011
First Posted
October 25, 2011
Study Start
October 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2012
Study Completion
February 1, 2012
Last Updated
February 9, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-02