Study Stopped
Decision to change trial design.
Compare Technegas Ventilation-Perfusion SPECT and Xenon Ventilation-Perfusion Planar Imaging for Pulmonary Embolism
A Comparison of Technegas® Ventilation-Perfusion SPECT and Xenon Ventilation-Perfusion Planar Imaging in Subjects Being Evaluated for Pulmonary Embolism
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Phase 3 within-subject trial of Technegas V/Q SPECT and Tc-99m macro-aggregated albumin (MAA) imaging compared to Xenon-133 V/Q planar and Tc-99m macroaggregate of albumin (MAA) imaging for the diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism (PE).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Aug 2012
Typical duration for phase_3
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 19, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 25, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 10, 2015
CompletedNovember 10, 2015
October 1, 2015
2.8 years
October 19, 2011
July 20, 2015
October 13, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Sensitivity of Technegas V/Q SPECT for the Diagnosis of PE
Compared to the sensitivity of Xenon V/Q Planar imaging. "Truth" based on blinded reader's assessments of V/Q SPECT images compared with subject's final diagnosis resulting from clinical information at 30 days follow-up.
Prospective, 30 days follow-up
Specificity of Technegas V/Q SPECT for the Diagnosis of PE.
Compared to the specificity of Xenon V/Q Planar imaging. "Truth" based on blinded reader's assessments of V/Q SPECT images compared with subject's final diagnosis resulting from clinical information at 30 days follow-up.
Prospective, 30 days follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Accuracy of Technegas V/Q SPECT and Xenon V/Q Planar Imaging for Diagnosis of PE
prospective, 30 days follow-up.
Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of Imaging for Diagnosis of PE
Prospective, 30 days follow-up
Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of Imaging for Diagnosis of PE
Prospective, 30 days follow-up
Likelihood Ratio for Diagnosis of PE
Prospective, 30 days follow-up
Safety of Technegas in Patients With Possible PE
Prospective, from enrollment through 30 days follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Technegas
EXPERIMENTALTechnegas V SPECT imaging with Technetium-99m (Tc-99m) labeled carbon particles; approximately 1.1 milliCuries of Technegas, compared with the results of Xenon-133 ventilation scan
Xenon-133
ACTIVE COMPARATORXenon-133 ventilation Planar imaging compared with the results of the Technegas scan.
Interventions
Technegas V SPECT imaging and Technetium 99m MAA Perfusion imaging for the diagnosis pf pulmonary embolism.
Xenon-133 Ventilation Planar imaging and Technetium 99m MAA Perfusion imaging for the diagnosis pf pulmonary embolism.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects will be enrolled in Cohort 1 if they meet the following requirements:
- Male or female, at least 18 years of age.
- Suspected of having PE and be a candidate for Xe-133 V/Q imaging.
- Willing and able to provide informed consent.
- Stable and able to undergo Xe-133 planar imaging, Technegas SPECT imaging, and planar/SPECT perfusion imaging and complete follow-up procedures.
- Willing and agree to complete study procedures, including follow-up safety assessments.
- Using adequate birth control, if female and fertile.
- If female, has a negative urine or serum pregnancy test.
- Agrees to return for a 24-hour and 30 day follow-up safety assessment.
- Subjects will be enrolled in Cohort 2 if they meet the above criteria AND subject is likely to have pulmonary embolism based on one or more of the following:
- Wells Score of 7 or greater. Subjects with a Wells Score less than 7 may be enrolled in Cohort 2 if there is agreement between the investigator and the medical monitor that the subject is at high risk for PE.
- An abnormal D-dimer test.
- Positive Doppler ultrasound for DVT.
- CTA is positive for PE within 24 hours of this imaging study.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject
- Has undergone imaging with Iodine-131 (I-131) within 30 days, Thallium-201 (Tl-201) or Indium-111 (In-111) within 10 days, Fluorine 18 (F-18) within 24 hours, or any other radiopharmaceutical not otherwise specified within 72 hours of this imaging study.
- Has previously undergone an imaging study with a Tc-99m agent, within 48 hours of this imaging study.
- Is a pregnant or lactating female.
- Has received Technegas in the past.
- Was previously enrolled in another investigational study or received an investigational drug within 30 days prior to dosing.
- Is hemodynamically unstable.
- Has received therapeutic dose of low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin within 24 hours prior to dosing or Tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA) within 4 hours prior to dosing or has received treatment for PE between the time of a positive CTA, if performed, and Technegas V/Q SPECT imaging.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
PE adjudication by Independent Committee for final clinical diagnosis and blinded readings of Xe-133 and Technegas Ventilation and Tc-99m MAA Perfusion images were not performed due to early trial termination. No efficacy data available.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gary Somerville, Quality and Regulatory Manager
- Organization
- Cyclomedica Australia Pty Ltd
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Edward M Aten, MD
Certus International, Inc.
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Akash Sharma, MD
Washington University Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Leung, MD, PhD
Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 19, 2011
First Posted
October 25, 2011
Study Start
August 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
November 10, 2015
Results First Posted
November 10, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10