NCT01458015

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to elucidate whether the additional mechanism of analgesia, i.e. reuptake inhibition of norepinephrine, of tapentadol leads to a change in different pain signs and symptoms in comparison to oxycodone.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
3

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2011

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 5, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2011

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 24, 2011

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2013

Completed
11.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 17, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

January 7, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

August 5, 2011

Results QC Date

September 9, 2022

Last Update Submit

December 17, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

QST (quantitative sensory testing)neuropathic paintapentadol proxycodone

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Mechanical Pain Threshold (MPT)

    Change of Mechanical Pain Threshold from baseline to V6 The mechanical pain threshold (MPT) was measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231. Logarithmically transformed raw data were z-transformed by subtracting the mean value of the corresponding reference group followed by a division the respective standard deviation. If the resulting z-value exceeds 1.96, it is outside the 95% confidence interval of the standard normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance, independent of the original units of measurement. (also see Rolke et. al.) A lower z-value indicates an improvement.

    day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

  • Heat Pain Threshold (HPT)

    Change of Heat Pain Threshold from V1 to V6 The was Heat Pain Threshold (HPT)measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231. Raw data were z-transformed by subtracting the mean value of the corresponding reference group followed by a division the respective standard deviation. If the resulting z-value exceeds 1.96, it is outside the 95% confidence interval of the standard normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance, independent of the original units of measurement. (also see Rolke et. al.) A lower z-value indicates an improvement.

    day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (10 weeks)

  • Wind-Up Ratio (WUR)

    Change of Wind-Up Ratio from V1 to V6 The Wind-Up Ratio (WUR) was measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231. Logarithmically transformed raw data were z-transformed by subtracting the mean value of the corresponding reference group followed by a division the respective standard deviation. If the resulting z-value exceeds 1.96, it is outside the 95% confidence interval of the standard normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance, independent of the original units of measurement. (also see Rolke et. al.) A lower z-value indicates an improvement.

    day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (10 weeks)

  • Cold Pain Threshold (CPT)

    Change of Cold Pain Threshold from baseline to V6 The Cold Pain Threshold (CPT) was measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231. Raw data were z-transformed by subtracting the mean value of the corresponding reference group followed by a division the respective standard deviation. If the resulting z-value exceeds 1.96, it is outside the 95% confidence interval of the standard normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance, independent of the original units of measurement. (also see Rolke et. al.) A lower z-value indicates an improvement.

    day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (10 weeks)

  • Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)

    Change of Pressure Pain Threshold from V1 to V6 The Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) was measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231. Logarithmically transformed raw data were z-transformed by subtracting the mean value of the corresponding reference group followed by a division the respective standard deviation. If the resulting z-value exceeds 1.96, it is outside the 95% confidence interval of the standard normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance, independent of the original units of measurement. (also see Rolke et. al.) A lower z-value indicates an improvement.

    day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

  • Mechanical Pain Sensitivity (MPS)

    Change of Mechanical Pain Sensitivity from V1 to V6 The Mechanical Pain Sensitivity (MPS) was measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231. Logarithmically transformed raw data were z-transformed by subtracting the mean value of the corresponding reference group followed by a division the respective standard deviation. If the resulting z-value exceeds 1.96, it is outside the 95% confidence interval of the standard normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance, independent of the original units of measurement. (also see Rolke et. al.) A lower z-value indicates an improvement.

    day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

  • Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia (DMA)

    Change of Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia from V1 to V6 The Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia (DMA) was measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). "Subjects were asked to give a pain rating for each stimulus on a '0-100' numerical rating scale ('0' indicating "no pain", and '100' indicating "most intense pain imaginable")." See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231. A lower score indicates an improvement.

    day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

  • Pain Upon Numeric Rating Scale

    Change of pain upon Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0 = no pain at all; 10 = maximum pain imaginable) from V1 to V6

    day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Cold Detection Threshold (CDT)

    day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (10 weeks)

  • Warmth Detection Threshold (WDT)

    day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

  • Thermal Sensory Limen (TSL)

    day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

  • Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT)

    day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

  • Vibration Detection Threshold (VDT)

    day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

oxycodone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: tapentadol, oxycodone

tapentadol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: tapentadol, oxycodone

Interventions

tapentadol pr 100-500 mg oxycodone cr 20-120mg

Also known as: Palexia
oxycodonetapentadol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • thermal or mechanical hyperalgesia
  • chronic neuropathic pain (NRS =\> 6)

You may not qualify if:

  • non-specific

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Division for Neurological Pain Research and Therapy

Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, 24105, Germany

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuralgia

Interventions

TapentadolOxycodone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsCodeineMorphine DerivativesMorphinansOpiate AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPhenanthrenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPolycyclic Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Prof. Ralf Baron
Organization
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel; Sektion neurologische Schmerzforschung und -therapie

Study Officials

  • Ralf Baron, Prof. Dr.

    Head of Unit of Neuropathic Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Clinic Kiel

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof. Dr. med.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2011

First Posted

October 24, 2011

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion

November 1, 2013

Study Completion

November 1, 2013

Last Updated

January 7, 2025

Results First Posted

December 17, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-12

Locations