Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Icatibant for the Treatment of HAE
IHA
Open Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a Self-Administered Subcutaneous Formulation of Icatibant for the Treatment of Acute Attacks of Hereditary Angioedema (IHA)
1 other identifier
interventional
19
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The investigators propose a study to evaluate the safety, local tolerability, convenience, and efficacy of self-administered Icatibant for the treatment of acute attacks of hereditary angioedema. The investigators believe that self administration with Icatibant for treatment of an acute attack of angioedema will not change the time to complete or near complete resolution of symptoms compared to treatment with Icatibant in a medical facility.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Dec 2011
Typical duration for phase_4
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 13, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 24, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 18, 2016
CompletedOctober 18, 2016
October 1, 2016
2.3 years
October 13, 2011
August 11, 2016
October 17, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to Complete or Near Complete Resolution From Onset of Symptoms
Time of onset of HAE attack, time icatibant was administered, and time to complete relief of symptoms were recorded in minutes. Time to complete relief of symptoms was defined as time from onset of symptoms to complete or near complete resolution as reported by the patient.
Time to complete or near complete resolution of symptoms as reported by the patient, an expected average of 8-10 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Percent Change in VAS Scores
Percent Change in VAS Score from Baseline to 4 Hours
Study Arms (1)
Icatibant
EXPERIMENTALOpen-label study
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and females at least 18 years of age at the time of informed consent
- Documented diagnosis of hereditary angioedema Type I or II based on ALL of the following criteria:
- Family and/or medical history
- Characteristic attack manifestations, recurrent attacks
- Historical low C4, normal C1q and either low C1-INH or low C1INH function
- Women of childbearing potential must use consistently and correctly a highly effective, adequate method of birth control (failure rate less than 1% per year), sexual abstinence or have a vasectomised partner during the duration of the study. Hormonal contraception can be continued if verified by a physician that it doesn't affect the course of hereditary angioedema attacks.
- Mental and physical condition allowing patients to complete baseline assessment, to self-administer Icatibant and to follow other study procedures.
- Ability to provide signed written informed consent after all aspects of the study have been explained and discussed with the patient.
You may not qualify if:
- Participation in a clinical therapeutic trial of another investigational medicinal product within the past month (except a previous Icatibant study).
- Diagnosis of angioedema other than Type I or Type II hereditary angioedema.
- Evidence of symptomatic coronary artery disease based on medical history, in particular, unstable angina pectoris or severe coronary heart disease.
- Congestive heart failure (NYHA Class 3 and 4).
- Stroke within the past 6 months.
- Treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor.
- Pregnancy and/or breast-feeding.
- In the opinion of the investigator: mental condition rendering the patient unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study.
- In the opinion of the investigator: unlikely to comply with the protocol, for example, uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits, or unlikely to complete the study for any reason.
- In the opinion of the investigator: inability to complete the patient diary, manage study medication or self-administration of an injection.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center
La Jolla, California, United States
UCLA - David Geffen School of Medicine
Los Angeles, California, United States
Institute for Allergy and Asthma
Wheaton, Maryland, 20902, United States
Penn State University
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States
AARA Research Center
Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
All adverse events were recorded and assessed out of total attacks, not total participants. There were 78 HAE attacks; 4 adverse events were identified.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Aleena Banerji
- Organization
- MGH Allergy Associates
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aleena Banerji, M.D.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 13, 2011
First Posted
October 24, 2011
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
April 1, 2014
Study Completion
April 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 18, 2016
Results First Posted
October 18, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10