A Japanese Phase 1/2 Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Romidepsin in Patients With Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL)
A Japanese Phase 1/2, Multicenter, Open-label Study to Assess the Efficacy, Tolerability, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Romidepsin in Subjects With the Progressive or Relapsed Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
1 other identifier
interventional
51
1 country
17
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study was to assess efficacy, tolerability, safety and pharmacokinetics of Romidepsin in subjects with progressive or relapsed peripheral T-cell lymphoma
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Dec 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_1
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 20, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 28, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 19, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 14, 2018
CompletedFebruary 11, 2019
January 1, 2019
3.7 years
October 18, 2011
July 11, 2016
January 28, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) in Accordance With National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 as Determined by the Efficacy and Safety Evaluation Committee (ESEC)
DLT was defined as an adverse event (AE) occurring in Cycle 1 in Phase 1 and judged that the causal relationship to the investigational product could not be denied. The severity of all AEs was graded based upon the NCI CTCAE version 3.0. DLTs were defined as: • Grade 4 Hemoglobin \<6.5 g/dL • Grade 4 Neutrophil \<500/μL continuing for at least 5 days • Febrile neutropenia (Grade 4 neutropenia caused by fever and ≥ 38.5° C for more than 1 hour) • Grade 4 thrombocyte (\< 25,000/μL), or thrombocytopenia with hemorrhage requiring platelet transfusion • Nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea at \> grade 3 in spite of treatment • Grade 3 ALT (alanine aminotransferase) or AST (aspartate aminotransferase) values continued for 7 days. • Grade 4 ALT or AST • Grade 2 arrhythmia • Grade 4 non-hematological AEs • Other grade 3 non-hematological AEs except transient fatigue, anorexia, hyponatremia, and tumor lysis syndrome • Other AEs leading to discontinuation of administration
Up to Day 28; Cycle 1
Percentage of PTCL Participants With an Overall Best Response in Accordance With a Modified International Workshop Response Criteria (IWC) 1999 in Phase 2
Objective disease response in PTCL was defined as patients with a complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu) or a partial response (PR) according to modified IWC 1999 criteria and assessed by an independent efficacy reviewer. A CR is \>75% decrease in size of maximum 6 largest target within nodal and extranodal lesions, complete disappearance of other nodal and extranodal; total disappearance of clinical disease; disease-related signs and symptoms, normalization of biochemical abnormalities, disappearance of spleen, liver, or kidney enlargement; no bone marrow (BM) involvement, no new sites of disease. CRu: all above criteria fulfilled except for BM involvement is indeterminate. PR: a ≥50% decrease in size of 6 largest target lesions and no increase other nodal and extranodal; no progression of clinical disease; disease-related signs and symptoms, normalization or biochemical abnormalities, no progression in size of liver, spleen, or kidney; and no new sites of disease
Tumor assessments performed every 2 months; median follow-up time was 100 days; up to the data cut-off of 28 July 2015
Secondary Outcomes (22)
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Associated With Romidepsin
Day 1 of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or discontinuation date; Up to data cut-off of 28 July 2015; maximum follow up time was 184.3 weeks
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) of Romidepsin in Phase 1
Day 1 at Cycle 1; collected at 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2, 3, and 4 (at the end of administration) hours after the start of administration, 0.25 (15 minutes), 0.5 (30 minutes), 1, 2, 4, 6, 20, and 44 hours after the end of administration
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC∞) of Romidepsin in Phase 1
Day 1 at Cycle 1; collected at 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2, 3, and 4 (at the end of administration) hours after the start of administration, 0.25 (15 minutes), 0.5 (30 minutes), 1, 2, 4, 6, 20, and 44 hours after the end of administration
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Romidepsin in Phase 1
Day 1 at Cycle 1; collected at 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2, 3, and 4 (at the end of administration) hours after the start of administration, 0.25 (15 minutes), 0.5 (30 minutes), 1, 2, 4, 6, 20, and 44 hours after the end of administration
Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration of Romidepsin (Tmax) in Phase 1
Day 1 at Cycle 1; collected at 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2, 3, and 4 (at the end of administration) hours after the start of administration, 0.25 (15 minutes), 0.5 (30 minutes), 1, 2, 4, 6, 20, and 44 hours after the end of administration
- +17 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Romidepsin
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive romidepsin intravenously for 4 hours on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle until when/if a discontinuation criterion, e.g., disease progression, severe adverse events, or consent withdrawal.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients must fulfill all of the following criteria to be eligible for study participation and have:
- Histologically confirmed Peripheral T cell Lymphoma (PTCL) Not Otherwise Specified (NOS), Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma, enteropathy- type T-cell lymphoma, subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (excludes mycosis fungoides or Sezary syndrome) , hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma, Anaplastic Large cell lymphoma (ALCL) \[anaplastic lymphoma kinase-1 (ALK-1) negative\], patients with ALK 1 expressing ALCL (ALK-1 positive) who have relapsed disease after Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation, Transformed mycosis fungoides (MF), or Sézary syndrome (SS);
- Age ≥20 years;
- Written informed consent;
- Progressive Disease following at least one systemic therapy or refractory to at least one prior systemic therapy;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2;
- Sufficient functions of bone marrow or other organs as evidenced by
- Hemoglobin ≥8.0 g/dL (The value after the 7th day of transfusion)
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1.0×10\^9/L (The value after the 7th day of G-CSF)
- Platelet counts ≥100 x 10\^9/L, or, if bone marrow infiltration is recognized, ≥75 ×10\^9/L
- Total bilirubin (Total-Bil) ≤2 x upper limit of normal (ULN) (≤3.0 x ULN in the presence of demonstrable liver metastasis)
- Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)/Serum Glutamic-Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) ≤2 x Upper Limit Normal (ULN) (≤3.0 x ULN in the presence of demonstrable liver metastasis)
- Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)/Serum Glutamic-Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) ≤2 x ULN (≤3.0 x ULN in the presence of demonstrable liver metastasis)
- Serum creatinine ≤ 2 x ULN
- Serum potassium ≥ lower limit of normal (LLN) and magnesium
- +2 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects in whom central nervous lymphoma is recognized during the screening period (If brain metastasis is suspected clinically, CT should be performed.)
- Subjects undergoing chemotherapy or immunotherapy for the purpose of treatment of the target disease within 22 days before C1D1 (including C1D1) (using antibody drugs only within 3 months before C1D1)
- Subjects receiving local application of steroids within 15 days before C1D1 (including C1D1) Use of steroids for the purpose other than that of treatment of the target disease should be allowed (Only CTCL subjects)
- Subjects receiving systemic application of steroids within 22 days before C1D1 (including C1D1) (It is acceptable to continue the use of the steroid for the purpose of treatment of the target disease,which administered in doses ≤ 10mg/day prednisolone or equivalent dose of other glucocorticoid. However increase of steroid dose cannot be allowed during the study period)
- Subjects undergoing radiation therapy, PUVA therapy or TSEB for the purpose of treatment of the target disease within 22 days before C1D1 (including C1D1)
- Subjects using other investigational products within 22 days before C1D1 (including C1D1) (using antibody drugs only within 3 months before C1D1)
- Subjects undergoing blood transfusion and using G-CSF within 8 days before C1D1 (including C1D1)
- Subjects with the following abnormalities in the cardiac function
- Congenital QT prolongation syndrome
- QTc interval \>480 msec
- Myocardial infarction within 6 months before C1D1. Subjects with a history of myocardial infarction between 6 and 12 months prior to C1D1 who are asymptomatic and have had a negative cardiac risk assessment (treadmill stress test, nuclear medicine stress test, or stress echocardiogram) since the event may occur
- Significant ECG abnormalities including atrio-ventricular (AV) block type II, 3rd degree AV block, or bradycardia (ventricular rate less than 50 beats/min)
- Symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) (e.g., Angina Canadian Class II-IV).
- An ECG recorded at screening showing significant ST depression (ST depression of ≥2 mm, measured from isoelectric line to the ST segment at a point 60 msec at the end of the QRS complex). If there is any doubt, the subject should have a stress imaging study and, if abnormal, angiography to define whether or not CAD is present.
- Congestive heart failure (CHF) that meets New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II to IV definitions and/or ejection fraction \<40% by MUGA scan or \<50% by echocardiogram and/or MRI
- +22 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Celgenelead
Study Sites (17)
Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 466-8650, Japan
Nagoya City University Hospital
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 467-8602, Japan
National Cancer Center Hospital East
Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577:, Japan
Ehime University Hospital
Tōon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
Chugoku Central Hospital
Fukuyamashi, Hiroshima, 720-0001, Japan
Sapporo Hokuyu Hospital
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 003-0006, Japan
Sapporo Medical University Hospital
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8543, Japan
Tokai University School of Medicine
Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan
Kochi Medical School Hospital
Nankoku, Kochi, 783-8505, Japan
Kinki University Hospital
Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan
National Cancer Center Hospital
Chūō, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
Japanese Red Cross Medical Center
Shibuya City, Tokyo, 150-8935, Japan
Kyushu University Hospital
Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
Kumamoto University Hospital
Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
University hospital, Kyoto prefectural University of Medicine
Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
Tohoku University Hospital
Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan
The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR
Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
Related Publications (1)
Maruyama D, Tobinai K, Ogura M, Uchida T, Hatake K, Taniwaki M, Ando K, Tsukasaki K, Ishida T, Kobayashi N, Ishizawa K, Tatsumi Y, Kato K, Kiguchi T, Ikezoe T, Laille E, Ro T, Tamakoshi H, Sakurai S, Ohtsu T. Romidepsin in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma: a phase I/II and pharmacokinetics study. Int J Hematol. 2017 Nov;106(5):655-665. doi: 10.1007/s12185-017-2286-1. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
PMID: 28664499DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Anne McClain, Senior Manager, Clinical Trial Disclosure
- Organization
- Celgene Corporation
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Toru Sasaki
Celgene K.K.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2011
First Posted
October 20, 2011
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 28, 2015
Study Completion
December 14, 2018
Last Updated
February 11, 2019
Results First Posted
August 19, 2016
Record last verified: 2019-01