Impact of Adherence to Treatment in Asthma Control
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This survey aims to analyze how adherence to treatment, using Ask-20 questionnaire and prescription count, influences level of asthma control in a sample of patients with severe and moderate-mild asthma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 10, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 20, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 28, 2013
CompletedAugust 28, 2013
June 1, 2013
1.1 years
October 10, 2011
August 17, 2012
June 4, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Analyze How Adherence to Treatment Using ASK-20 Questionnaire Influences Level of Asthma Control.
The ASK-20 (Adherence Starts with Knowledge)is a brief, self-reported instrument developed to identify patient-specific barriers to medication adherence and to improve provider/patient communication about adherence. Programs incorporating a clinical assessment tool such as the ASK-20 for identifying a broad range of risk factors for nonadherence and for developing patient-specific intervention may reduce adherence barriers and improve disease control and ability to perform daily activities in patients with asthma. To gauge the overall risk of nonadherence, the total ASK-20 score was calculated,as the sum of the individual item score, ranging from 1 to 5 and therefore total ranges score from 20 (less barriers to adherence) to 100 (more barriers).
4 weeks
Analyze How Adherence to Treatment Using Prescription Account Influences Level of Asthma Control.
Analyze how adherence to treatment using prescription count influences level of asthma control in a sample of patients with severe and moderate-mild asthma. The second primary endpoint analyzes how adherence, using prescription counts, influences the level of asthma control. Good adherence to treatment was defined as a count of prescriptions issued by their family physician greater than 80% of the required treatment during the last 6 months. Asthma control was measured by Asthma Control Test (ACT). Bad control if ACT score \< or = 19 . Good control if ACT score \> 19.
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Fraction Exhaled of Nitric Oxide (FeNO) According to Level of Asthma Control.
4 weeks
Gender According to Level of Asthma Control.
4 weeks
Smoking Habit According to Level of Asthma Control.
4 weeks
Obesity According to Level of Asthma Control.
4 weeks
Rhinitis According to Level of Asthma Control.
4 weeks
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with ASTHMA will be categorized into two subgroups: a) 50 patients with good asthma control according to the Asthma Control Test (ACT) score; b) 50 patients with bad control asthma according to the ACT score.
You may qualify if:
- Patients with a diagnosis of asthma according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)guideline criteria .
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), residual pulmonary lesions or bronchiectasis seen on simple chest x-ray.
- Presence of another associated acute or chronic inflammatory disease.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara
Guadalajara, Castille-La Mancha, 19002, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This is an observational (cross-sectional )study, with the limitations and biases associated. Patients have not been randomized.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Carlos Almonacid
- Organization
- SESCAM - HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE GUADALAJARA
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carlos Almonacid Sanchez, Phd, MD
Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD, MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 10, 2011
First Posted
October 20, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2012
Study Completion
August 1, 2012
Last Updated
August 28, 2013
Results First Posted
August 28, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-06