Effect of High Dose Ciclesonide on Asthma Control
CONTRAST
Control of Moderate or Severe Asthma With 160, 320 and 640 mcg Ciclesonide/Day. A One-year Randomised, Double-blind, Multicenter Trial.
4 other identifiers
interventional
520
5 countries
30
Brief Summary
The aim of the trial is to investigate asthma control with 160 to 640 mcg ciclesonide/day. Asthma control will be assessed by the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Nov 2011
Typical duration for phase_3
30 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 17, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 25, 2016
CompletedFebruary 10, 2017
December 1, 2016
2.8 years
October 17, 2011
April 24, 2016
December 21, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score at Baseline
The ACQ was developed to measure the adequacy of asthma control in clinical research and in clinical practice. It includes 5 questions about symptoms, 1 question about beta 2 -agonist use and 1 about lung function (FEV1% predicted). Participants recall their experiences during the previous 7 days and respond to each question using a 7-point scale. The items are equally weighted and the ACQ score is the mean of 7 items and ranges between 0 (well controlled) and 6 (extremely poorly controlled). Mean scores of =\<0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.76 and \< 1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and a score \>= 1.5 indicates uncontrolled asthma.
Baseline
Change From Baseline in ACQ Score to Tlast
The ACQ was developed to measure the adequacy of asthma control in clinical research and in clinical practice. It includes 5 questions about symptoms, 1 question about beta 2 -agonist use and 1 about lung function (FEV1% predicted). Participants recall their experiences during the previous 7 days and respond to each question using a 7-point scale. The items are equally weighted and the ACQ score is the mean of 7 items and ranges between 0 (well controlled) and 6 (extremely poorly controlled). Mean scores of =\<0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.76 and \< 1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and a score \>= 1.5 indicates uncontrolled asthma.
Week 52
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Time Course of ACQ
Baseline, Week 52 (Treatment period)
Number of Weeks With Well-controlled Asthma Over the Course of the Study
Baseline up to Week 52 (treatment period)
Number of Participants With Well-controlled Asthma and ACQ Improvement at the End of the Study
Week 52
Number of Participants Reporting Time to First Well-Controlled Asthma and ACQ Improvement
Baseline up to Week 52 (treatment period)
Number of Participants Reporting Time to First Well-Controlled Asthma Measurement by ACQ Cut-Off Point
Baseline up to Week 52 (treatment period)
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
CIC 160
ACTIVE COMPARATORTwo puffs of 40 mcg ciclesonide inhaled in the morning and the evening (corresponding to a total daily dose of 160 mcg)
CIC 320
ACTIVE COMPARATORTwo puffs of 80 mcg ciclesonide inhaled in the morning and the evening (corresponding to a total daily dose of 320 mcg)
CIC 640
ACTIVE COMPARATORTwo puffs of 160 mcg ciclesonide inhaled in the morning and the evening (corresponding to a total daily dose of 640 mcg)
Interventions
During the treatment period subjects will inhale two puffs of either 40, 80 or 160 μg ciclesonide in the morning and the evening (corresponding to a total daily dose of 160, 320 or 640 μg)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written informed consent was provided
- History of persistent bronchial asthma for at least 6 months
- Current treatment with an Inhaled Corticosteroid (ICS) at a stable dose in the dose range of 200-1000 μg Fluticasone Propionate (FP)/day or equivalent for a minimum of 12 weeks
- Good inhalation technique
- Under the current ICS pre-treatment the ACQ score ranges between ≥ 0.75 and ≥ 2
You may not qualify if:
- Clinically relevant abnormal laboratory values suggesting an unknown disease and requiring further clinical evaluation
- Concomitant severe diseases (e.g. malignant diseases during the past 5 years \[other than basal or squamous cell carcinoma\], hepatitis C, acquired immune deficiency syndrome \[AIDS\])
- Diseases which are contraindications for the use of ICS (e.g. active or inactive pulmonary tuberculosis or relevant fungal, bacterial or viral infections of the lower respiratory tract demanding specific treatment)
- Use of systemic glucocorticosteroids within 4 weeks (injectable depot steroids 6 weeks) before entry into the baseline period, or more than 3 times during the last 6 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AstraZenecalead
Study Sites (30)
Unknown Facility
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Rosario, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Rosario-Santa Fe, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Salta, Argentina
Unknown Facility
San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Florianópolis, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Goiânia, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Porto Alegre, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Rio de Janiero, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Santo André, Brazil
Unknown Facility
São Paulo, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Sorocaba, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Berlin, Germany
Unknown Facility
Bonn, Germany
Unknown Facility
Landsberg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Rüdersdorf, Germany
Unknown Facility
Schwetzingen, Germany
Unknown Facility
Beersheba, Israel
Unknown Facility
Haifa, Israel
Unknown Facility
Jerusalem, Israel
Unknown Facility
Kfar Saba, Israel
Unknown Facility
Petah Tikva, Israel
Unknown Facility
Rehovot, Israel
Unknown Facility
Tel Aviv, Israel
Unknown Facility
Barnaul, Russia
Unknown Facility
Moscow, Russia
Unknown Facility
Novosibirsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Tomsk, Russia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center
- Organization
- AstraZeneca
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
AstraZeneca AstraZeneca
AstraZeneca
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2011
First Posted
October 19, 2011
Study Start
November 1, 2011
Primary Completion
August 1, 2014
Study Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 10, 2017
Results First Posted
October 25, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-12