NCT01449084

Brief Summary

Temporary pancreatic duct stent placement during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been recommended for post-endoscopic pancreatitis (PEP) prophylaxis in high risk patients, including those in whom accidental pancreatic duct cannulation has occurred. However, the optimal duration of stent placement remains an open question. The investigators aim is to assess if immediate stent removal is effective in the prevention of PEP after accidental pancreatic duct cannulation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2009

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2009

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2011

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 4, 2011

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 7, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

October 12, 2011

Status Verified

October 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

October 4, 2011

Last Update Submit

October 10, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

Pancreatic duct stentingPost-endoscopic pancreatitis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of participants with adverse events, i.e. post-endoscopic pancreatitis

    Post-endoscopic pancreatitis is defined as pancreatic pain and hyperamylasemia within 24 hours of the procedure and is assessed by a physician blinded to group assignment and to radiological surveillance findings. Pancreatic pain is defined as severe and persistent pain in the epigastric or periumbilical region. Hyperamylasemia is defined as an increase in the serum amylase level to greater than 3 times the upper normal limit. The pancreatitis is defined as mild, moderate, or severe according to the criteria proposed by Cotton et al. (GE 1991).

    24 h

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of participants with proximal migration of the stent among those patients randomly assigned to leaving the stent in place.

    96 hours

Study Arms (2)

early removal of pancreatic duct stent

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

immediate removal of the pancreatic duct stent at the end of the ERCP procedure

Procedure: immediate stent removal

leaving the stent in place

NO INTERVENTION

the pancreatic duct stent is left in place

Other: Leaving the stent in place

Interventions

The stent used was a 5-Fr polyethylene duodenal pigtail pancreatic stent without an inner flange. The stent length was 4 or 5 cm (Zimmon stent, Cook Endoscopy, Winston-Salem, NC, USA): selection was based on the degree of flexion and the length of the Wirsung duct in the head of the pancreas. THE STENT WAS REMOVED AT THE END OF THE ERCP PROCEDURE

early removal of pancreatic duct stent

The stent used was a 5-Fr polyethylene duodenal pigtail pancreatic stent without an inner flange. The stent length was 4 or 5 cm (Zimmon stent, Cook Endoscopy, Winston-Salem, NC, USA): selection was based on the degree of flexion and the length of the Wirsung duct in the head of the pancreas. THE STENT WAS LEFT IN PLACE AT THE END OF THE ERCP PROCEDURE

leaving the stent in place

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients in whom accidental pancreatic duct cannulation had occurred
  • during guide wire directed ERCP

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who had undergone previous endoscopic papillectomy or sphincterotomy
  • and those with an indwelled nasobiliary or nasopancreatic tube

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino-Estense

Modena, 41100, Italy

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pancreatitis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pancreatic DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Rita Conigliaro, MD

    Gastroenterologia - NOCSAE - Modena

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director, Head of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, NOCSAE

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2011

First Posted

October 7, 2011

Study Start

December 1, 2009

Primary Completion

June 1, 2011

Study Completion

June 1, 2011

Last Updated

October 12, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-10

Locations