Effect of Azithromycin on Oesophageal Hypomotility
Effect Of Azithromycin On Oesophageal Function In Patients With Dysphagia Or Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Associated With Frequent Oesophageal Hypomotility
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients with difficulty in swallowing (dysphagia) or with reflux disease are frequently found to suffer from oesophageal hypomotility (weak contractions). Oesophageal motility is currently measured using high-resolution manometry (HRM). This technique has a 36 pressure sensors on a plastic tube to record the pressure in side the oesophagus. Several pharmaceutical agents (prokinetics) can stimulate oesophageal motility. However, use of prokinetics in patients with oesophageal hypomotility led to disappointing results. An explanation for these disappointing results is that inappropriate patients were targeted. The appropriate patient would be the one who still have some viable muscle in the oesophagus that can respond to pharmacological stimuli. In the process of developing treatment strategies in patients with oesophageal hypomotility, testing the preserved capacity of oesophageal muscles could be useful to predict the response of these patients to prokinetic drugs. The following tests have the potential to reveal the preserved capacity of the oesophageal muscle to respond to stronger/medicinal stimuli.
- 1.\- Multiple rapid swallowing (MRS) of 5ml water boluses stimulates oesophagus. A normal response to MRS requires on the one hand integrity of neural mechanisms and on the other hand a functional oesophageal muscle.
- 2.\- External abdominal compression can increase the resistance to bolus transport via oesophagus. The normal oesophagus produces contractions of higher amplitude and duration in order to maintain a normal bolus transit.
- 3.\- Swallowing bread boluses require stronger oesophageal contractions for a successful bolus transit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Aug 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 30, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 7, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedApril 22, 2015
April 1, 2015
2.4 years
September 30, 2011
April 21, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effect of Azithromycin on oesophageal peristalstic contraction amplitude in patients with hypomotility
The amplitude of peristaltic contractions and also Distal Contractal Integral which summarises the vigour of peristalsis will be measured before and after treatment with Azithromycin. Measurement is performed by oesophageal high resolution manometry. The measures will be compared to decide on the effect oo Azithromycin on oesophageal motility.
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Manometric oesophageal body response (amplitude of peristaltic contractions in mmHg and also Distal Contractal Integral in mmHg.cm.second) to solid bolus swallows, MRS and outlet obstruction in healthy subjects and patients with oesophageal hypomotility.
4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORTaking placebo 3 times per week for four weeks
AZI
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy subjects:
- Written ICF signed voluntarily before the first trial-related activity.
- Subjects male and female within age range of 18-70 years old (extremes included)
- BMI \<35
- Patients group:
- Written ICF signed voluntarily before the first trial-related activity.
- Patients male and female, aged 18-70
- Been diagnosed with severe oesophageal hypomotility based on Chicago classification 2011
- Must have moderate or severe reflux symptoms and/ or dysphagia, with at least one of these symptoms of moderate severity or worse, and at a minimum average frequency of three days a week during the two weeks prior to the study date
- If the subject is a woman of childbearing potential, she
- must have a negative urine pregnancy test before the start of treatment (minimum β-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin \[HCG\] sensitivity of 25 mIU/ml), and
- must agree to either use an effective form of birth control (i.e., stabilized on oral contraceptives for at least 1 month or using implanted, transdermal or injected contraceptive hormones, an intra-uterine device, or continuous abstinence from heterosexual sexual contact), or a combination of a barrier method and a spermicidal agent (i.e., cervical cap and spermicidal agent, condom and spermicidal agent, or diaphragm and spermicidal agent),
You may not qualify if:
- Healthy subjects:
- Any incidental abnormal oesophageal motility finding
- History of gastrointestinal symptoms, gastrointestinal tract surgery or other recent abdominal operation within last 3 months.
- Major psychiatric, neurological, respiratory, liver, haemorrhagic and cardiac disorders, malignancies
- Pregnancy and no wheat allergy
- Patients:
- Subjects with a documented history of long segment (\>3 cm) Barrett's oesophagus.
- Subjects with documented or suspected large (\> 3 cm) hiatus hernia.
- Subjects with fundoplication, endoscopic anti-reflux procedure or major prior GI surgery.
- Subjects with structural abnormalities of oesophagus (ie. Rings and webs, scleroderma)
- Severe oesophageal motility disorders other than oesophageal hypomotility (e.g., achalasia, nutcracker oesophagus).
- Subjects who suffer from frequent vomiting (\>1/week)
- Current diagnosis of co-existing psychiatric disease (including alcohol or drug abuse); controlled depression and anxiety are allowed, when treated with at most
- Allergy to prokinetic medicine (AZI), gluten or egg, allergy to latex (reflux monitoring catheter has cross reaction with latex)
- Patients with concomitant prohibited medications, unless willing or able to withdraw from these medications
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- JAFAR JAFARIlead
Study Sites (1)
Royal London Hospital
London, London, E1 1BB, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- CLINICAL RESEARCH FELLOW
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 30, 2011
First Posted
October 7, 2011
Study Start
August 1, 2012
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 22, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-04