Study to Assess Longer-term Opioid Medication Effectiveness (SALOME)
SALOME
SALOME: Multi-Centre, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing The Effectiveness Of Diacetylmorphine Vs. Hydromorphone For The Treatment Of Long-Term Injection Opioid Users Who Do Not Benefit From Available Therapies
1 other identifier
interventional
202
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study, SALOME, is to determine if 1) the closely supervised provision of injectable, hydromorphone (HDM; trade name Dilaudid™) is as effective as injectable diacetylmorphine (DAM; heroin) in the treatment of chronic, multi-morbid opioid-dependent individuals who have not benefited sufficiently from conventional treatments, and if a switch to the oral equivalent of hydromorphone and diacetylmorphine is as effective as the injection form. The availability of an effective, licensed opioid medication such as hydromorphone, for substitution treatment of chronic, multi-morbid treatment-refractory opioid-dependent individuals, would be of immense impact locally and internationally. It could help to establish alternative treatment options where for non-medical reasons Heroin Assisted Treatment would not be acceptable. Thus, one result could be the expansion of treatment options for the most difficult to treat heroin dependent persons. This would also be an important step for secondary prevention of HIV and Hepatitis C as well as a better integration of those patients in other medical treatments. Switching from intravenous to oral application would also reduce a lot of potential risk factors (like overdose, seizures, infections, etc) and side effects associated with the injection route. Additionally it could make these treatments more feasible in normal treatment settings, like existing methadone services.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Dec 2011
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 4, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 6, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2016
CompletedJune 7, 2016
June 1, 2016
2.5 years
October 4, 2011
June 5, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in days of illicit heroin use from baseline.
Use of illicit heroin at a time point is defined as the number of days of illicit ("street") heroin in the prior 30 days of the 6 month treatment period by means of self report.
baseline and 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Hydromorphone
EXPERIMENTALPhase I: Injectable Hydromorphone is received for 6 months of the study. Phase II: At 6 months, participants are randomized to either: 1) stay on injectable hydromorphone; or 2) switch to oral hydromorphone, for another six months.
Diacetylmorphine
ACTIVE COMPARATORPhase I: Injectable Diacetylmorphine is received for 6 months of the study. Phase II: At 6 months, participants are randomized to either: 1) stay on injectable Diacetylmorphine; or 2) switch to oral Diacetylmorphine, for another six months.
Interventions
Phase I: 3x daily, up to 500mg per day, for 6 months. Phase II: At 6 months, participants are randomized to either: 1) stay on injectable hydromorphone; 2) switch to oral hydromorphone, for another 6 months.
Phase I: 3x daily, up to 1,000mg per day, for 6 months. Phase II: At 6 months, participants are randomized to either: 1) stay on injectable diacetylmorphine; 2) switch to oral diacetylmorphine, for another 6 months.
Study Phase II: After 6 months of receiving Hydromorphone injectable , participants will be randomized to stay on injectable hydromorphone or switch to oral hydromorphone, for another six months. Oral = experimental; injectable = active comparator
Study Phase II: After 6 months of receiving Diacetylmorphine injectable, participants will be randomized to stay on injectable Diacetylmorphine or switch to oral Diacetylmorphine, for another six months. Oral = experimental; injectable = active comparator
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Regular use of opioids for five years
- Injecting opioids in the past year
- Two attempts at treatment including one methadone (or other substitution)
- Must be a legal adult
- Struggling with drug related problems
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy upon study entry
- Diagnosis of severe medical or psychiatric conditions contra-indicated for diacetylmorphine or hydromorphone treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of British Columbialead
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)collaborator
- Providence Healthcarecollaborator
- Innerchange Charitable Societycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
SALOME Research Office
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6B 1C8, Canada
Related Publications (5)
Oviedo-Joekes E, Brissette S, Marsh DC, Lauzon P, Guh D, Anis A, Schechter MT. Diacetylmorphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid addiction. N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 20;361(8):777-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810635.
PMID: 19692689BACKGROUNDOviedo-Joekes E, Guh D, Brissette S, Marsh DC, Nosyk B, Krausz M, Anis A, Schechter MT. Double-blind injectable hydromorphone versus diacetylmorphine for the treatment of opioid dependence: a pilot study. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Jun;38(4):408-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.03.003. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
PMID: 20359843BACKGROUNDPalis H, Marchand K, Guh D, Brissette S, Lock K, MacDonald S, Harrison S, Anis AH, Krausz M, Marsh DC, Schechter MT, Oviedo-Joekes E. Men's and women's response to treatment and perceptions of outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of injectable opioid assisted treatment for severe opioid use disorder. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2017 May 19;12(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13011-017-0110-9.
PMID: 28526048DERIVEDOviedo-Joekes E, Guh D, Brissette S, Marchand K, MacDonald S, Lock K, Harrison S, Janmohamed A, Anis AH, Krausz M, Marsh DC, Schechter MT. Hydromorphone Compared With Diacetylmorphine for Long-term Opioid Dependence: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 May 1;73(5):447-55. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0109.
PMID: 27049826DERIVEDOviedo-Joekes E, Marchand K, Lock K, MacDonald S, Guh D, Schechter MT. The SALOME study: recruitment experiences in a clinical trial offering injectable diacetylmorphine and hydromorphone for opioid dependency. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2015 Jan 26;10:3. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-10-3.
PMID: 25619263DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eugenia Oveido-Joekes, Ph.D.
University of British Columbia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael R Krausz, M.D.
University of British Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2011
First Posted
October 6, 2011
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
February 1, 2016
Last Updated
June 7, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06