Adherence and Health Effects of Video Dance in Postmenopausal Women
Phase 2 Trial of Video Dance Versus Walking in Postmenopausal Sedentary Overweight Women
3 other identifiers
interventional
168
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a 6 month randomized clinical trial comparing video dance, brisk walking and delayed entry controls. The interventions have two phases; a 12 week initiation phase with substantial structure and supervision, followed by a 12 week transition phase, with reduced structure and supervision. Participants are 168 overweight or obese, sedentary postmenopausal women aged 50 to 65; 60 in each exercise arm and 48 in the wait list control group. The following research questions will be assessed:
- 1.Is exercise adherence at 6 months better with video dance games compared to brisk walking?
- 2.Does video dance game exercise compared to wait list controls, induce beneficial changes in physical and mental health?
- 3.Does video dance game exercise compared to brisk walking better promote balance, attention and visual spatial skills, without loss of benefit to cardiovascular fitness?
- 4.Is video dance preferred to brisk walking for exercise among postmenopausal women? If so, who and why?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2012
CompletedOctober 2, 2017
September 1, 2017
2.6 years
September 27, 2011
September 27, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Adherence
minutes per week of moderate or greater physical exercise activity assessed using accelerometers and activity diaries
six months after randomization
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Endurance
3 and 6 months
body composition
6 months
vascular health
6 months
balance
3 and 6 months
personality
baseline
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
VideoDance
EXPERIMENTALBrisk Walking
ACTIVE COMPARATORDelayed entry control
OTHERParticipants who are randomized to the delayed entry non-exercise control group receive the American Heart Association pamphlet, but no direct support for exercise implementation. After they have completed six months of follow up, they are invited to select any combination of dancing and walking that they prefer and then receive support and instruction according to the protocols described above.
Interventions
Using a commercially available product called Dance Dance Revolution (DDR) this video-game based dancing system uses a game player, force sensing pad and software. The step sequences are set to a wide range of music and become more complex and frequent as the dancer gains skill. Participants are oriented over 2 weeks. For the rest of the first 3 months, the participant attends at least one supervised session per week. Participants may use the center for additional, unsupervised sessions and/or they can take a dance system home. They also receive brief behavioral intervention sessions for safety orientation, exercise education and adherence promotion. For the following 3 months, the participant enters the transition phase in which she is encouraged to continue to exercise but no formal supervision is provided.
The overall goal is to increase the duration and speed of walking, using structure and supervision for the first three months, followed by reduced support in the second three months. For the first two weeks, each participant comes to the center at least twice a week to walk.They are encouraged to gradually increase effort and duration to a target of 150 minutes per week of brisk walking.Participants are taught to use Borg's ratings of perceived exertion and self-monitored heart rate to target their level of activity. The next 10 weeks include once weekly supervised sessions and additional sessions either at the center or in preferred community settings. The recommended goal is a minimum of 150 minutes per week of exercise in sessions of at least 10 -15 minutes duration.Participants are given pedometers in order to help them monitor their progress. After 12 weeks, the participant enters a transition phase for a further 3 months.
Participants who are randomized to the delayed entry non-exercise control group receive the American Heart Association pamphlet, but no direct support for exercise implementation. After they have completed six months of follow up, they are invited to select any combination of dancing and walking that they prefer and then receive support and instruction according to the protocols described above. \--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants must be female
- age 50-65
- not currently exercising at least 20 minutes
- three times per week
- a BMI of 25 or higher
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Pittsburghlead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Related Publications (1)
Jovancevic J, Rosano C, Perera S, Erickson KI, Studenski S. A protocol for a randomized clinical trial of interactive video dance: potential for effects on cognitive function. BMC Geriatr. 2012 Jun 6;12:23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-12-23.
PMID: 22672287DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephanie A Studenski, MD MPH
University of Pittsburgh
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2011
First Posted
September 29, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
July 31, 2012
Study Completion
September 30, 2012
Last Updated
October 2, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09