NCT01436123

Brief Summary

Intensive therapy with rosuvastatin 40 mg and ApoA-I Milano reduces the total atheroma volume (TAV) up to 6.38 or 14.1 mm3 respectively. Our previous bench studies PLASMONICS and NANOM First-in-Man trial documented TAV reduction up to unprecedented 79.4 and 60.3 mm3 respectively with high level of safety and feasibility. The completed randomized two arm (1:1) study (NANOM-PCI) with parallel assignment (n=62) assessed (NCT01436123) the safety and feasibility of the delivery technique for nanoparticles (NP) using micro-injection catheter (with intravascular intramural injection of allogeneous stem cells carrying NP after MSCT-, IVUS- and OCT-guided mapping of the vessel), and plasmonic photothermal therapy of atherosclerosis combined with stenting (Nano group, n=32) versus stenting with Xience V cage (Stenting group, n=30). The primary outcome was TAV at 12 months. The mean reduction of TAV at 12 months in Nano group was -84.1 mm3 (95% CI: SD 28.3; min -52.4 mm3, max -99.1 mm3; p\<0.05) versus +12.4 mm3 in case of stenting (p\<0.05 between groups). 42/62 patients (68%) in Nano group passed the Glagov threshold of a 40% plaque burden with mean plaque burden (PB) 36.2% (95% CI: SD 9.3%, min 30.9%, max 44.5%). The increase of the minimal lumen diameter was 61.2 and 63.3% at 12 month follow up in groups respectively. The serial assessment of VH-IVUS showed a significant decrease at 12 months in the dense calcium area, fibrous and fibro-fatty tissue with fulminant necrosis due to thermolysis in Nano-group, whereas an increase of fibrous and fibro-fatty components in stenting arm. We have documented 2 vs 3 cases of the definite thrombosis and 3 vs 5 cases of target lesion revascularization in groups respectively. The analysis of the event-free survival of the ongoing clinical follow-up shows the significantly lower risk of cardiovascular death in Nano group if compare with conventional stenting (93.4% vs 86.7%; p\<0.05). Plasmonic resonance-mediated therapy using noble-metal NP associated with significant regression of coronary atherosclerosis. Tested delivery approach has acceptable safety and efficacy for atheroregression below a 40% PB. The investigators hypothesize that multistep approach with the use of stent in acute care unit, and then subsequent transcatheter micro-injection with nanoparticles can resolve atherosclerosis, stop and regress atherogenesis, remodulate or even rejuvenate arteries. Stem cells in patch can be good carriers for nanoparticles as well as high-effective metabolic vectors (paracrine-like regulation of alive cells and via bioactive products of cell lysis after detonation of nanoparticles) for the treatment of plaque on site. Gold nanoparticles with silica-iron oxide shells promise high-energy plasmonic photothermic burning or melting effect under the near-infrared laser irradiation onto the lesion. Thus the investigators expect complex two-side effect on the plaque with protected lumen and adventitia. Novel discoveries in atherogenesis, and development of nanobiotechnologies with potentials for the management of atherosclerosis leads us to the quest of new approaches. The investigators still cannot really effectively treat atherosclerosis. The investigators management is more symptomatic, and lipid-pool or inflammation-oriented! The investigators cannot manage non-organic part (mineral deposits, calcified necrotic core, partially collagen and fibrotic tissue) and total plaque volume Surgery and invasive procedures is just focused on blood flow restoration (just manipulate the form of plaque) + concerns of clinical and technical restrictions (incl. alien body - stent) + risk of restenosis or subacute 'fatal' in-stent atherothrombosis + graft survival/ occlusion + surgery-related complications High rate of short- and long-term complications and readmissions. Regression of atherosclerosis in fact is still a dream. The investigators offer an alternative to stenting and may be cardiac artery bypass surgery (CABG). Our approach can really allow to rejuvenate arteries, Plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPTT) can burn plaque, but stem cells and bioengineered structures promise restoration of the vessel wall. Our personal previous data showed that PPTT can 1.6-fold reduce a volume of plaque with most optimal long-term result in subsets with the use of SPCs as a delivery approach. The most optimal delivery systems of NPs into the plaque are the on-artery bioengineered patch and ferro-magnetic approach.

Trial Health

60
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
62

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_1 coronary-artery-disease

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2010

Geographic Reach
2 countries

3 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2010

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 14, 2011

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 19, 2011

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2012

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

May 19, 2015

Status Verified

May 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

September 14, 2011

Last Update Submit

May 17, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Plasmonic Photothermal TherapyNanoparticlesStem cellsAtherosclerosisBioengineeringBiodegradable stentingRepair disease

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Total atheroma volume

    Total plaque volume measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), cubic mm.

    at month 12

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Composite end-point of any MACE (major acute cardiovascular events), all-cause death, any revascularization

    at month 12

  • Composition of plaque

    at month 12

  • Major and minor bleeding

    at month 12

  • Restenosis rate

    at month 12

  • Stent thrombosis rate

    at month 12

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Stenting + Micro-infusion

EXPERIMENTAL

Step 1 - implantation of everolimus-eluting stent with imaging by MSCT, IVUS and OCT; Step 2 - injection of stem cells containing gold nanoparticles with silica-iron oxide shells.

Other: Stenting and micro-infusion of NP

Stenting

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Put in everolimus-eluting stent

Device: Implantation of everolimus-eluting stent

Interventions

Step 1 - IVUS, OCT-guided put in everolimus-eluting (drug-eluting-DES) stent + intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) mapping + harvesting stem cells with mesenchymal phenotype; Step 2 - culturing of stem cells in medium by gold nanoparticles with silica-iron oxide shells; Step 3 - micro-infusion of stem cells bearing NP into the lesion; Step 4 - detonation of nanoshells after migration of stem cells with NPs inside (until 7-10 days after transplantation). We expect 'melting' and 'burning' effects of PPTT, beneficial effects of bioactive products of stem cells lysis + benefits from further migration of stem cells from patch into the plaque

Also known as: Plasmonic Photothermal Therapy (PPTT), Stem cell therapy, Bioengineering, Stenting, Xience V stent
Stenting + Micro-infusion

Put stent in ischemia-related coronary artery by indications for PCI

Also known as: Stenting, Xience V stent
Stenting

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Multivessel coronary artery disease without indications for CABG
  • Stable angina with indications for preventive PCI
  • NSTEMI (primary PCI and late comers) \<=\> 12 hr
  • STEMI with kept EF\>50% (all comers)
  • Rescue PCI
  • Vessel size between 2.3-4.0 mm
  • NYHA II-III functional class of HF
  • De novo treatment = no history of PCI or CABG
  • Atherosclerosis of proximal left anterior descending artery \<50% stenosis
  • Treated hypertension
  • Signed written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • History of MI
  • History of CABG or PCI
  • Indications for CABG
  • Contraindications for CABG, PCI
  • History of unstable angina, coronary artery syndrome
  • History of arrhythmias
  • History of stroke
  • NYHA I, IV functional class of HF
  • Diabetes (fasting glucose \> 7.0 mM/L)
  • Untreated hypertension
  • Asthma
  • Participation to any drug-investigations during previous 60 days
  • Pregnancy
  • Intolerance to any limus drugs, aspirin, clopidogrel, aspirin, metals and polymers of stent and nanoparticles
  • Need for chronic treatment with anti-vitamin K drugs
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

De Haar Research Foundation

Rotterdam, South Holland, 3071PR, Netherlands

Location

Ural Center of Modern Nanotechnologies, Institute of Natural Sciences, Ural Federal University

Yekaterinburg, Sverdlovsk Oblast, 620000, Russia

Location

Ural Institute of Cardiology

Yekaterinburg, Sverdlovsk Oblast, 620144, Russia

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Kharlamov AN. Plasmonic photothermal therapy for atheroregression below Glagov threshold. Future Cardiol. 2013 May;9(3):405-25. doi: 10.2217/fca.13.16.

    PMID: 23668744BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery DiseaseAtherosclerosis

Interventions

StentsBioengineering

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostheses and ImplantsEquipment and SuppliesEngineeringTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Officials

  • Alexander Kharlamov, M.D., Ph.D.

    Ural Institute of Cardiology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Jan Gabinsky, M.D., Ph.D.

    Ural Institute of Cardiology

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Olga Kovtun, M.D., Ph.D.

    Ural State Medical University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research manager

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2011

First Posted

September 19, 2011

Study Start

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion

July 1, 2012

Study Completion

October 1, 2012

Last Updated

May 19, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-05

Locations