Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac CT Perfusion Compared to PET Imaging
1 other identifier
observational
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This purpose of this research project is to test the diagnostic accuracy (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and receiver operator curve area under the curve) of cardiac computed tomography (CT) perfusion as compared to the best non-invasive test of blood flow -- cardiac positron emission transmission (PET) perfusion imaging. The primary outcome of the study is to determine the CT perfusion technique with the highest overall diagnostic accuracy measured by the highest area under the receiver operator curve. The investigators will test 4 different CT perfusion techniques. (A) Qualitative, visual inspection of the contrast-enhanced CT images (B) Enhanced voxel distribution analysis (C) Rate of myocardial contrast enhancement analysis (D) Quantitative heart blood flow using a distributed 2-region analysis A second aim is to reduce the radiation dose needed to maintain CT perfusion diagnostic accuracy. Using the CT perfusion data, the investigators will model the minimal number of cardiac cycle radiation exposures needed to keep the diagnostic accuracy similar to the full data set. A third aim is to test the incremental diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography plus CT perfusion to identify regions of low blood flow as compared to PET perfusion alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Sep 2011
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 9, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 14, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2019
CompletedMay 9, 2023
May 1, 2023
6.3 years
September 9, 2011
May 8, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic accuracy measures of cardiac CT perfusion techniques
Diagnostic performance includes sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and receiver operator curve area under the curve \[ROC AUC\]. The highest ROC AUC will be considered the best diagnostic performance and will be compared statisically using the c-statistic.
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Minimal number of images needed for CT perfusion
1 month
Diagnostic accuracy of CCTA and CT perfusion compared to PET perfusion imaging alone
1 month
Study Arms (1)
Myocardial ischemia patients
Eligibility Criteria
Adults with suspected or known myocardial ischemia
You may qualify if:
- Patients referred for
- clinically indicated PET imaging for assessment of myocardial ischemia
- clinically indicated CCTA scanning with known coronary artery disease
- ≥20 years of age and ≤ 80 years of age
- Able to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications to beta blockers or regadenoson
- Active reactive airway disease
- nd or 3rd degree heart block (without a pacemaker)
- Sick sinus syndrome (without a pacemaker)
- Long QT syndrome (QTC \> 500 msec)
- Severe hypotension
- Decompensated heart failure
- Pregnancy
- Contraindications to undergoing any CT imaging procedure with contrast:
- Irregular heart rhythm despite beta blockade
- Creatinine \>1.6 mg/dl
- Allergy to iodinated contrast medium
- Inability to lie flat
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98115, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Medicine/Cardiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 9, 2011
First Posted
September 14, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 31, 2017
Study Completion
December 31, 2019
Last Updated
May 9, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05