Augmenting Language Therapy for Aphasia: Levodopa
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the medication levodopa, in combination with speech-language treatment, on the language outcome of study subjects with nonfluent aphasia (i.e. difficulty with the comprehension and expression of spoken and written language) following a stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Oct 2007
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 2, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 5, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 28, 2013
CompletedDecember 25, 2013
November 1, 2013
4.4 years
August 2, 2011
June 5, 2013
November 27, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Language Quotient (LQ) on the Western Aphasia Battery
Includes a measure of auditory comprehension, oral expression, reading and written expression skills. The scale ranges from 1 - 100 with 100 being better. The change or gain score from baseline to immediately post-treatment (at 6 weeks) is reported. The larger the change score, the greater the improvement.
Change from Baseline in Western Aphasia Battery LQ at 6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Functional Communication Skills
Change from Baseline in functional communication skills at 6 weeks
Participation in Everyday Activities
Change from Baseline in participation in everyday activities at 6 weeks
Western Aphasia Battery - Reading and Writing Scores
Change from Baseline in Western Aphasia Battery Reading and Writing scores at 6 weeks
Western Aphasia Battery Aphasia Quotient (Maintenance)
Change in Western Aphasia Battery AQ from 6 weeks to 12 weeks
Western Aphasia Battery Reading and Writing Scores (Maintenance)
Change in WAB Reading and Writing Skills from 6 weeks to 12 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Levodopa/carbidopa
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe study drug (100 mg levodopa / 25 mg carbidopa), is received orally 30-45 minutes before 1 hour of speech-language treatment, five days a week, for six weeks.
Inactive pill
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe placebo comparator (inactive pill) is received orally 30-45 minutes before 1 hour of speech-language treatment, five days a week, for six weeks.
Interventions
The study drug (100 mg levodopa / 25 mg carbidopa), is received orally 30-45 minutes before 1 hour of speech-language treatment, five days a week, for six weeks.
The placebo comparator (inactive pill) is received orally 30-45 minutes before 1 hour of speech-language treatment, five days a week, for six weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A single unilateral left-hemisphere stroke
- Nonfluent aphasia, with a mean length of utterance of 0-4 words and an Aphasia Quotient between 20 and 75 on the Western Aphasia Battery
- Age 21 or older.
- At least 6 months post-stroke
- Able to comply with the study protocol
- Premorbidly right-handed, as determined by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory
- Fluent in English premorbidly
- Completed at least 8th grade education
You may not qualify if:
- More than one stroke
- Any other neurological condition that could potentially affect cognition or speech.
- Global aphasia or inability to participate in routine speech therapy.
- Major active psychiatric illness that may interfere with required study procedures.
- Untreated or inadequately treated depression.
- Has started taking a potentially confounding central nervous system (CNS) drug within the previous 2 months.
- Current abuse of alcohol or drugs
- Nursing a child or pregnant
- Participation in another drug, device or biologics trial within the preceding 90 days
- Unable to understand, cooperate or comply with study procedures
- Significant visual or auditory impairment
- History of sensitivity to ergot derivatives.
- Active medical illness or current medication that precludes safe participation in this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLablead
- U.S. Department of Educationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Center for Aphasia Research & Treatment
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
* Dosage and timing of the L-dopa in relation to the behavioral treatment may not have been optimum. * Efficacy of the behavioral treatment in both arms may have overridden the enhancing effect of the l-dopa in one arm
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Leora R. Cherney, PhD
- Organization
- Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 2, 2011
First Posted
September 5, 2011
Study Start
October 1, 2007
Primary Completion
March 1, 2012
Study Completion
March 1, 2012
Last Updated
December 25, 2013
Results First Posted
November 28, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-11