A Study of Fluzone® High-Dose Vaccine Compared With Fluzone® Vaccine In Elderly Adults
Efficacy Study of Fluzone® High-Dose Vaccine Compared With Fluzone® Vaccine In Elderly Adults
2 other identifiers
interventional
31,989
3 countries
113
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of Fluzone High-Dose compared to standard dose Fluzone for laboratory-confirmed or culture-confirmed influenza caused by influenza types/subtypes that are similar (for laboratory-confirmed) or antigenically similar (for culture-confirmed) to those contained in the respective annual vaccine formulations. Primary Objective:
- To compare the clinical efficacy of Fluzone High-Dose to that of Fluzone in elderly adults, with respect to laboratory-confirmed influenza caused by any influenza viral types/subtypes, associated with the occurrence of a protocol-defined influenza-like-illnesses (ILI). Secondary Objectives:
- To compare the clinical efficacy of Fluzone High-Dose to that of Fluzone in elderly adults, with respect to laboratory-confirmed influenza, caused by any influenza viral types/subtypes, associated with the occurrence of a protocol-defined ILI.
- To compare the clinical efficacy of Fluzone High-Dose to that of Fluzone in elderly adults, with respect to culture-confirmed influenza, caused by any influenza viral types/subtypes, associated with the occurrence of a protocol-defined ILI.
- To compare the clinical efficacy of Fluzone High-Dose to that of Fluzone in elderly adults, with respect to culture-confirmed influenza caused by viral types/subtypes antigenically similar to those contained in the respective annual vaccine formulations, associated with the occurrence of a modified Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-defined ILI.
- To compare the clinical efficacy of Fluzone High-Dose to that of Fluzone in elderly adults, with respect to culture-confirmed influenza caused by any influenza viral types/subtypes, associated with the occurrence of a modified CDC-defined ILI.
- To compare the clinical efficacy of Fluzone High-Dose to that of Fluzone in elderly adults, with respect to culture-confirmed influenza caused by viral types/subtypes antigenically similar to those contained in the respective annual vaccine formulations, associated with the occurrence of a respiratory illness.
- To compare the clinical efficacy of Fluzone High-Dose to that of Fluzone in elderly adults, with respect to culture-confirmed influenza caused by any influenza viral types/subtypes, associated with the occurrence of a respiratory illness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Sep 2011
Typical duration for phase_4
113 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 30, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 6, 2014
CompletedApril 20, 2015
March 1, 2015
1.7 years
August 30, 2011
July 8, 2014
March 30, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Occurrences of Culture- or Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-Confirmed Influenza Caused by Any Influenza Viral Types/Subtypes, in Association With a Protocol-defined Influenza-like Illness (ILI).
Influenza positive cultures were confirmed using direct immunofluorescence techniques with influenza type-specific antibodies. 3 culture methods were utilized for each NP sample (Classic Flu A and B culture using Madin Darby Canine Kidney cells, Classic Flu A and B culture using Rhesus Monkey Kidney cells, and R Mix Flu A and B culture). The initial molecular test (PCR) was the validated ProFlu+™ assay by Prodesse, Inc., Waukesha, WI, which had been approved by the Food and Drug Administration through a 510K evaluation for specific detection of Influenza A, B or Respiratory Syncytial Virus. A protocol-defined influenza-like illness was determined by the occurrence of at least 1 of the following respiratory symptoms: sore throat, cough, sputum production, wheezing, or difficulty breathing; concurrently with at least one of the following systemic symptoms: fever (defined as temperature \> 99.0°F \[\> 37.2°C\]), chills (shivering), tiredness (fatigue), headache, or myalgia (muscle aches).
≥14 days post-vaccination
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Occurrences of Culture-confirmed Influenza Caused by Influenza Viral Types/Subtypes That Are Antigenically Similar to Those Contained in the Vaccine Formulations, in Association With a Protocol-defined Influenza-like Illness (ILI)
≥14 days post-vaccination
Occurrences of Culture-confirmed Influenza Caused by Any Influenza Viral Types/Subtypes, in Association With a Protocol-defined Influenza-like Illness
≥14 days post-vaccination
Occurrences of Culture-confirmed Influenza Caused by Influenza Viral Types/Subtypes That Are Antigenically Similar to Those Contained in the Vaccine Formulations, in Association With a Modified CDC-defined Influenza-like Illness.
≥14 days post-vaccination
Occurrences of Culture-confirmed Influenza Caused by Any Influenza Viral Types/Subtypes, in Association With a Modified CDC-defined Influenza-like Illness
≥14 days post-vaccination
Occurrences of Culture-confirmed Influenza Caused by Influenza Viral Types/Subtypes That Are Antigenically Similar to Those Contained in the Vaccine Formulations, in Association With a Respiratory Illness
≥14 days post-vaccination
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Safety Overview After Injection With Either Fluzone High Dose or Fluzone Vaccine Through the End of Surveillance Period
Day 0 up to Day 240 post-vaccination
Study Arms (2)
High Dose Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive an injection of High Dose Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine
Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive an injection of the Trivalent Inactivated Influenza vaccine
Interventions
0.5 mL Intramuscular
0.5 mL, Intramuscular
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged ≥ 65 years on the day of vaccination
- Informed consent form signed and dated
- Able to attend all scheduled visits and to comply with all trial procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- Participation at the time of study enrollment (or in the 4 weeks preceding the trial vaccination), or planned participation during each year of the trial period, in another clinical trial investigating a vaccine, drug, medical device, or medical procedure (Note: Concomitant participation in an observational trial is acceptable)
- Vaccination against influenza in the 6 months preceding the trial vaccination
- Systemic hypersensitivity to eggs, chicken proteins, or any of the vaccine components, or a history of a life-threatening reaction to Fluzone High-Dose or Fluzone vaccine or to a vaccine containing any of the same substances
- Personal history of Guillain-Barré Syndrome
- Dementia or any other cognitive condition at a stage that could interfere with following the trial procedures
- Thrombocytopenia contraindicating intramuscular (IM) vaccination, as judged by the investigator
- Current alcohol abuse or drug addiction
- Subject deprived of freedom by an administrative or court order, or in an emergency setting, or hospitalized involuntarily
- Identified as an Investigator or employee of the Investigator or study center with direct involvement in the proposed study, or identified as an immediate family member (i.e., parent, spouse, natural or adopted child) of the Investigator or employee with direct involvement in the proposed study
- Moderate or severe acute illness with or without fever (oral temperature \> 99.0ºF \[\> 37.2ºC\]). If this contraindication exists, vaccination will be deferred until the individual has been medically stable and/or afebrile (temperature ≤ 99.0 ºF \[≤ 37.2ºC\]) for at least 24 hours
- Signs and symptoms of an acute infectious respiratory illness. If this exists, vaccination will be deferred until the symptoms resolve.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (113)
Unknown Facility
Mobile, Alabama, 36608, United States
Unknown Facility
Chandler, Arizona, 85224, United States
Unknown Facility
Glendale, Arizona, 85306, United States
Unknown Facility
Glendale, Arizona, 85308, United States
Unknown Facility
Mesa, Arizona, 85203, United States
Unknown Facility
Mesa, Arizona, 85213, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, 85020, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, 85028, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, 85050, United States
Unknown Facility
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85251, United States
Unknown Facility
Tempe, Arizona, 85283, United States
Unknown Facility
Harrisburg, Arkansas, 72432, United States
Unknown Facility
Anaheim, California, 92801, United States
Unknown Facility
La Mesa, California, 91942, United States
Unknown Facility
Oceanside, California, 92056, United States
Unknown Facility
Redding, California, 96001, United States
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, 92103, United States
Unknown Facility
Santa Rosa, California, 95405, United States
Unknown Facility
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Unknown Facility
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907, United States
Unknown Facility
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80922, United States
Unknown Facility
Milford, Connecticut, 01757, United States
Unknown Facility
Milford, Connecticut, 06460, United States
Unknown Facility
Brooksville, Florida, 34601, United States
Unknown Facility
Clearwater, Florida, 33756, United States
Unknown Facility
Clearwater, Florida, 33761, United States
Unknown Facility
Coral Gables, Florida, 33134, United States
Unknown Facility
Crystal River, Florida, 34429, United States
Unknown Facility
DeLand, Florida, 32720, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216, United States
Unknown Facility
Melbourne, Florida, 32935, United States
Unknown Facility
Pembroke Pine, Florida, 33026, United States
Unknown Facility
Pinellas Park, Florida, 33781, United States
Unknown Facility
Sarasota, Florida, 34231, United States
Unknown Facility
Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281, United States
Unknown Facility
Boise, Idaho, 83642, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, 60654, United States
Unknown Facility
Peoria, Illinois, 61602, United States
Unknown Facility
Mishawaka, Indiana, 46545, United States
Unknown Facility
Lenexa, Kansas, 66219, United States
Unknown Facility
Newton, Kansas, 67114, United States
Unknown Facility
Overland Park, Kansas, 66212, United States
Unknown Facility
Prairie Village, Kansas, 66206, United States
Unknown Facility
Wichita, Kansas, 67205, United States
Unknown Facility
Wichita, Kansas, 67207, United States
Unknown Facility
Bardstown, Kentucky, 40004, United States
Unknown Facility
Lexington, Kentucky, 40504, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbia, Maryland, 21045, United States
Unknown Facility
Elkridge, Maryland, 21075, United States
Unknown Facility
Rockville, Maryland, 20850, United States
Unknown Facility
Brockton, Massachusetts, 02301, United States
Unknown Facility
Haverhill, Massachusetts, 01830, United States
Unknown Facility
Edina, Minnesota, 55435, United States
Unknown Facility
Kansas City, Missouri, 64114, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, 63141, United States
Unknown Facility
Missoula, Montana, 59808, United States
Unknown Facility
Bellevue, Nebraska, 68005, United States
Unknown Facility
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114, United States
Unknown Facility
Las Vega, Nevada, 89104, United States
Unknown Facility
Newington, New Hampshire, 03801, United States
Unknown Facility
Edison, New Jersey, 08817, United States
Unknown Facility
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87018, United States
Unknown Facility
Binghamton, New York, 13901, United States
Unknown Facility
Endwell, New York, 13760, United States
Unknown Facility
Rochester, New York, 14609, United States
Unknown Facility
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
Unknown Facility
Cary, North Carolina, 27518, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209, United States
Unknown Facility
Hickory, North Carolina, 28602, United States
Unknown Facility
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609, United States
Unknown Facility
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612, United States
Unknown Facility
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144, United States
Unknown Facility
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401, United States
Unknown Facility
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
Unknown Facility
Fargo, North Dakota, 58104, United States
Unknown Facility
Idaho Falls, North Dakota, 83404, United States
Unknown Facility
Akron, Ohio, 44311, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45227, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45259, United States
Unknown Facility
Cleveland, Ohio, 44122, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbus, Ohio, 43213, United States
Unknown Facility
Norman, Oklahoma, 73069, United States
Unknown Facility
Erie, Pennsylvania, 16506, United States
Unknown Facility
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15241, United States
Unknown Facility
Scranton, Pennsylvania, 18510, United States
Unknown Facility
Warwick, Rhode Island, 02886, United States
Unknown Facility
Anderson, South Carolina, 29621, United States
Unknown Facility
Clinton, South Carolina, 29325, United States
Unknown Facility
Greer, South Carolina, 29650, United States
Unknown Facility
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464, United States
Unknown Facility
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303, United States
Unknown Facility
Bristol, Tennessee, 37620, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Worth, Texas, 76107, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Unknown Facility
Tomball, Texas, 77375, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84109, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84121, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84124, United States
Unknown Facility
South Jordan, Utah, 84095, United States
Unknown Facility
West Jordan, Utah, 84088, United States
Unknown Facility
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States
Unknown Facility
Williamsburg, Virginia, 23185, United States
Unknown Facility
Winchester, Virginia, 22601, United States
Unknown Facility
Coquitlam, British Columbia, V3K3P4, Canada
Unknown Facility
Mount Pearl, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1N1W7, Canada
Unknown Facility
Truro, Nova Scotia, B2N1L2, Canada
Unknown Facility
Greater Sudbury, Ontario, P3E1H5, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, M9W4L6, Canada
Unknown Facility
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H4J6, Canada
Unknown Facility
Bayamón, 00961, Puerto Rico
Unknown Facility
San Juan, 00909, Puerto Rico
Related Publications (3)
DiazGranados CA, Dunning AJ, Kimmel M, Kirby D, Treanor J, Collins A, Pollak R, Christoff J, Earl J, Landolfi V, Martin E, Gurunathan S, Nathan R, Greenberg DP, Tornieporth NG, Decker MD, Talbot HK. Efficacy of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccine in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 14;371(7):635-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1315727.
PMID: 25119609RESULTBecker DL, Chit A, DiazGranados CA, Maschio M, Yau E, Drummond M. High-dose inactivated influenza vaccine is associated with cost savings and better outcomes compared to standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine in Canadian seniors. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Dec;12(12):3036-3042. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1215395. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
PMID: 27669017DERIVEDDunning AJ, DiazGranados CA, Voloshen T, Hu B, Landolfi VA, Talbot HK. Correlates of Protection against Influenza in the Elderly: Results from an Influenza Vaccine Efficacy Trial. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2016 Jan 13;23(3):228-35. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00604-15.
PMID: 26762363DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Director
- Organization
- Sanofi Pasteur Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Director
Sanofi Pasteur Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 30, 2011
First Posted
September 1, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
November 1, 2013
Last Updated
April 20, 2015
Results First Posted
August 6, 2014
Record last verified: 2015-03