NCT01421641

Brief Summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of an intracervical lidocaine injection versus topical lidocaine gel on the pain experienced by patients undergoing tenaculum application to the cervix during office gynecologic procedures. This study will also evaluate how satisfied women are with the method of pain control used. The researchers hypothesize that:

  1. 1.There is less pain perceived by patients undergoing placement of a tenaculum on the cervix when a lidocaine injection is used compared to a topical lidocaine gel.
  2. 2.Patients are more satisfied with pain control during the overall experience of undergoing tenaculum placement on the cervix when a lidocaine injection is used compared to a topical lidocaine gel.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
74

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2011

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 9, 2011

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 23, 2011

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2011

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2012

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 21, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

April 21, 2014

Status Verified

March 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

August 9, 2011

Results QC Date

November 13, 2013

Last Update Submit

March 18, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

TenaculumPainLidocaine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Tenaculum Pain

    The primary outcome was pain at the time of tenaculum placement. Patient asked to pain scale using 100mm Visual Analog Scale (0mm=no pain, 100mm=worst pain of my life) during after tenaculum placement.

    After tenaculum placement

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Intervention Pain

    after application of randomized intervention

  • Tenaculum Placement Satisfaction

    After placement of the tenaculum

Study Arms (2)

Intracervical Lidocaine Injection

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Injection of 2 cc of 1% lidocaine solution at the anterior lip of the cervix using a standard 22 gauge spinal needle.

Drug: Intracervical Lidocaine Injection

Topical Lidocaine Gel

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Application of 1cc of 2% lidocaine gel to the anterior lip of the cervix with a Q-tip (this amount of lidocaine will be measured out prior to procedure)

Drug: Topical Lidocaine Gel

Interventions

Injection of 2 cc of 1% lidocaine solution at the anterior lip of the cervix using a standard 22 gauge spinal needle

Also known as: Lidocaine injection, paracervical blocker
Intracervical Lidocaine Injection

Application of 1cc of 2% lidocaine gel to the anterior lip of the cervix with a Q-tip

Also known as: lidocaine gel, numbing gel
Topical Lidocaine Gel

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Generally healthy women
  • Age 18 and over
  • Indication for endometrial biopsy or IUD placement

You may not qualify if:

  • Allergy to lidocaine or other local anesthetic
  • Pregnancy, known or suspected
  • Patients who are premedicated with misoprostol
  • Patients with a chronic pain condition for which the patient takes daily pain medication

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Oregon Health & Science University

Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neck PainPelvic PainPain

Interventions

Lidocaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Limitations and Caveats

There are several limitations to this study, including potential selection bias, difficulty with blinding the intervention, timing of the intervention for maximal effect, and the limitations inherent in measuring pain.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Paula Bednarek
Organization
Oregon Health & Science University

Study Officials

  • Paula Bednarek, MD MPH

    Oregon Health and Science University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD MPH

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2011

First Posted

August 23, 2011

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion

May 1, 2012

Study Completion

May 1, 2012

Last Updated

April 21, 2014

Results First Posted

April 21, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-03

Locations