Tenaculum Pain Control Study
The Effect of Intracervical Lidocaine Injection Versus Topical Lidocaine Gel on the Pain Experienced by Patients Undergoing Tenaculum Application to the Cervix at the Time of an Office Gynecologic Procedure
1 other identifier
interventional
74
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of an intracervical lidocaine injection versus topical lidocaine gel on the pain experienced by patients undergoing tenaculum application to the cervix during office gynecologic procedures. This study will also evaluate how satisfied women are with the method of pain control used. The researchers hypothesize that:
- 1.There is less pain perceived by patients undergoing placement of a tenaculum on the cervix when a lidocaine injection is used compared to a topical lidocaine gel.
- 2.Patients are more satisfied with pain control during the overall experience of undergoing tenaculum placement on the cervix when a lidocaine injection is used compared to a topical lidocaine gel.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Sep 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 9, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 23, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 21, 2014
CompletedApril 21, 2014
March 1, 2014
8 months
August 9, 2011
November 13, 2013
March 18, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Tenaculum Pain
The primary outcome was pain at the time of tenaculum placement. Patient asked to pain scale using 100mm Visual Analog Scale (0mm=no pain, 100mm=worst pain of my life) during after tenaculum placement.
After tenaculum placement
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Intervention Pain
after application of randomized intervention
Tenaculum Placement Satisfaction
After placement of the tenaculum
Study Arms (2)
Intracervical Lidocaine Injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORInjection of 2 cc of 1% lidocaine solution at the anterior lip of the cervix using a standard 22 gauge spinal needle.
Topical Lidocaine Gel
ACTIVE COMPARATORApplication of 1cc of 2% lidocaine gel to the anterior lip of the cervix with a Q-tip (this amount of lidocaine will be measured out prior to procedure)
Interventions
Injection of 2 cc of 1% lidocaine solution at the anterior lip of the cervix using a standard 22 gauge spinal needle
Application of 1cc of 2% lidocaine gel to the anterior lip of the cervix with a Q-tip
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Generally healthy women
- Age 18 and over
- Indication for endometrial biopsy or IUD placement
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to lidocaine or other local anesthetic
- Pregnancy, known or suspected
- Patients who are premedicated with misoprostol
- Patients with a chronic pain condition for which the patient takes daily pain medication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
There are several limitations to this study, including potential selection bias, difficulty with blinding the intervention, timing of the intervention for maximal effect, and the limitations inherent in measuring pain.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Paula Bednarek
- Organization
- Oregon Health & Science University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paula Bednarek, MD MPH
Oregon Health and Science University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD MPH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 9, 2011
First Posted
August 23, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
May 1, 2012
Study Completion
May 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 21, 2014
Results First Posted
April 21, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03