NCT01420536

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to compare the canine guidance (CG) and bilateral balanced occlusion (BBO) on denture satisfaction and kinesiographic parameters of complete denture wearers, by means of a cross-over trial. Edentulous patients will receive new maxillary and mandibular complete dentures and, after the intraoral adjustments and adaptation period, will randomly receive a sequence of occlusal schemes: BBO followed by CG, or CG followed by BBO.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2009

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2009

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 10, 2011

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 19, 2011

Completed
9.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 26, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

January 26, 2021

Status Verified

January 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

August 10, 2011

Results QC Date

June 27, 2012

Last Update Submit

January 5, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Bilateral Balanced OcclusionCanine GuidanceComplete DentureDenture RetentionDental OcclusionEdentulousEdentulismMandibular movementMasticationPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Satisfaction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Denture Satisfaction

    Assessed by a questionnaire questionnaire based on the criteria used by Celebic and Knezovic-Zlataric (A comparison of patient's satisfaction between complete and partial removable denture wearers. J Dent. 2003;21:445-451) and used by Souza et al. (Validation of the Brazilian versions of two inventories for measuring oral health-related quality of life of edentulous subjects. Gerodontology. 2012;29:e88-95.). Eight questions were answered according to a three-point scale (0=unsatisfactory; 1=regular; 2=good), whose sum provided a summary satisfaction score that ranged from 0 (the participant is completely dissatisfied with existing dentures) to 16 (maximum satisfaction).

    30 days

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Kinesiographic Parameters -- (1.a) Maximum Mouth Opening, Vertical Axis

    30 days

  • Kinesiographic Parameters -- (1.b) Maximum Mouth Opening, Anteroposterior Axis

    30 days

  • Kinesiographic Parameters -- (1.c) Maximum Mouth Opening, Left-right Axis

    30 days

  • Kinesiographic Parameters -- (2.a) Rest Position, Vertical Axis

    30 days

  • Kinesiographic Parameters -- (2.b) Rest Position, Anteroposterior Axis

    30 days

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Canine Guidance

EXPERIMENTAL

Complete dentures adjusted with "mutually protected articulation in which the vertical and horizontal overlap of the canine teeth disengage the posterior teeth in the excursive movements of the mandible" (The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. J. Prosthet. Dent., 94(1): 10-92)

Procedure: Occlusal scheme

Bilateral Balanced Occlusion

SHAM COMPARATOR

Complete dentures as conventionally adjusted: anterior and posterior teeth presented bilateral contact in excentric positions

Procedure: Occlusal scheme

Interventions

Before enrollment, all participants will receive conventional complete dentures adjusted according to the bilateral balanced occlusion concept. Following randomization, canine guidance will be achieved by adding composite resin (Restorative Z100, 3M Brazil, Sumaré, SP, Brazil) on the lingual surface of the maxillary canines. A sham comparator will also employ the addition of composite, but without changing eccentric contacts.

Also known as: Dental articulation, Denture oclusion
Bilateral Balanced OcclusionCanine Guidance

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients needing new complete dentures
  • Mentally receptiveness
  • Absence of dysfunctional disorders of the masticatory system
  • Normal volume and resilience of residual edentulous ridges
  • Absence of debilitating systemic diseases

You may not qualify if:

  • Use of cardiac pacemaker
  • Refusal to participate or inability to provide informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Araraquara Dental School -Universidade Estadual Paulista (Sao Paulo State University)

Araraquara, São Paulo, 14801-903, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Paleari AG, Marra J, Rodriguez LS, de Souza RF, Pero AC, Mollo Fde A Jr, Compagnoni MA. A cross-over randomised clinical trial of eccentric occlusion in complete dentures. J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Aug;39(8):615-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02299.x. Epub 2012 Apr 9.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Mouth, EdentulousJaw, EdentulousBites and StingsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Satisfaction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mouth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesTooth DiseasesJaw DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesPoisoningChemically-Induced DisordersWounds and InjuriesTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Limitations and Caveats

* Losses during follow-up (although only 3 participants declined to continue the research - relatively small number); * Possibility of errors in the kinesiographic assessment (low and equally distributed between the different conditions).

Results Point of Contact

Title
Prof. Marco Antonio Compagnoni
Organization
Araraquara Dental School -Universidade Estadual Paulista (Sao Paulo State University)

Study Officials

  • Raphael F de Souza, DDS, PhD

    University of Sao Paulo

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Marco A Compagnoni, DDS, PhD

    Araraquara Dental School -Universidade Estadual Paulista (Sao Paulo State University)

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2011

First Posted

August 19, 2011

Study Start

February 1, 2009

Primary Completion

June 1, 2011

Study Completion

June 1, 2011

Last Updated

January 26, 2021

Results First Posted

January 26, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-01

Locations