Efficacy and Safety Study of iSONEP With & Without Lucentis/Avastin/Eylea to Treat Wet AMD
Nexus
Phase 2a, Multicenter, Masked, Randomized, Comparator Controlled Study Evaluating iSONEP™ as Monotherapy or Adjunctive Therapy to Lucentis/Avastin/Eylea Versus Lucentis/Avastin/Eylea Alone for Treatment of Subjects With Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
1 other identifier
interventional
158
1 country
44
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine the safety and efficacy of 4 monthly injections of iSONEP given alone or in combination with Lucentis, Avastin or Eylea in subjects with wet Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD). iSONEP not only has an anti-permeability effect, but also has anti-angiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-fibrotic properties. The drug may therefore have the ability to achieve better visual outcomes than Lucentis, Avastin or Eylea, particularly in those subjects who do not demonstrate a robust response to Lucentis, Avastin or Eylea after several monthly injections. Further, the combination of Lucentis, Avastin or Eylea and iSONEP may be additive or synergistic. By inhibiting the multiple mechanisms that contribute to exudative-AMD-related vision loss, better visual outcomes may be possible than with Lucentis, Avastin or Eylea alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Aug 2012
Typical duration for phase_2
44 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 9, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 17, 2016
CompletedOctober 17, 2016
August 1, 2016
2.7 years
August 9, 2011
June 27, 2016
August 22, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)
Visual function was assessed using the ETDRS protocol, for which numerical scores range from 0 to 100 (roughly equivalent to 20/10 vision as measured by Snellen). A higher score represents better functioning. A positive number represents an increase in number of letters read correctly.
Baseline to Day 120
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Mean Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness
Baseline to Day 120
Mean Change in CNV Lesion Area as Determined by Fluorescein Angiography (FA).
Baseline to Day 120
Proportion of Subjects Gaining Greater Than or Equal to 0, 5, 10 and 15 Letters on the ETDRS Chart.
Baseline to Day 120
Proportion of Subjects Losing 3 Lines or More in ETDRS BCVA.
Baseline to Day 120
Proportion of Subjects With ETDRS BCVA of 20/40 or Better.
Baseline to Day 120
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Monotherapy
EXPERIMENTAL4.0 mg iSONEP followed by sham injection; given monthly intravitreously for 4 months
0.5 mg iSONEP & Lucentis/Avastin/Eylea
EXPERIMENTAL0.5 mg iSONEP and 0.5 mg Lucentis or 1.25 mg Avastin or 2 mg Eylea; given monthly intravitreously for 4 months
4.0 mg iSONEP & Lucentis/Avastin/Eylea
EXPERIMENTAL4.0 mg iSONEP followed by 0.5 mg Lucentis or 1.25 mg Avastin or 2 mg Eylea; given monthly intravitreously for 4 months
Lucentis or Avastin or Eylea
ACTIVE COMPARATOR0.5 mg Lucentis or 1.25 mg Avastin or 2 mg Eylea followed by a sham injection; given monthly intravitreously for 4 months
Interventions
4.0 mg iSONEP given monthly intravitreously for 4 months
0.5 mg iSONEP given monthly intravitreously for 4 months
0.5 mg Lucentis or 1.25 mg Avastin or 2 mg Eylea given monthly intravitreously for 4 months
administered monthly for 4 months
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥50 years of age with a diagnosis of wet AMD
- Subjects who have received 3 injections of Lucentis or Avastin or Eylea within 12 months prior to screening
- Active subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD (leakage on FA)
- Presence of residual subretinal or intraretinal fluid on Cirrus or Spectralis SDOCT
- SDOCT in the 1 mm central macular subfield on the retinal map analysis of ≥250 μm at screening
- ETDRS BCVA of ≥25 and ≤73 letters (approximately 20/320 and 20/40 on the Snellen scale) at screening and on Day 0
- In the fellow eye, ETDRS BCVA of 20/400 or better
- Subject with serous pigment epithelial detachment (PED) (any part of which may be subfoveal) with intraretinal and/or subretinal fluid may be included
You may not qualify if:
- Most recent IVT injection of Lucentis or Avastin fewer than 28 days and more than 65 days prior to screening
- Most recent IVT injection of Eylea fewer than 42 days and more than 79 days prior to screening
- Previous photodynamic therapy (PDT) or Macugen® at any time point
- Focal thermal laser or grid laser within 3 months prior to Day 0
- Use of IVT, subtenon or subconjunctival steroids within 3 months prior to Day 0
- Use of topical ophthalmic corticosteroids 2 weeks prior to Day 0
- Intraocular surgery, including cataract surgery, and / or laser of any type within 3 months prior to Day 0 or anticipated need for ocular surgery or ophthalmic laser treatment during the study period
- Subjects previously treated with, or are currently receiving treatment with another investigational agent or device for neovascular AMD in the study eye
- Retinal total lesion size \>12 disc areas (30.5 mm2), including blood, scars and neovascularization as assessed by FA in the study eye
- Presence of a fibrovascular PED extending underneath the center of the fovea
- Presence of retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP) lesions
- Presence of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) (if suspected, Indocyanine Green Angiography (ICG) should be performed at the discretion of the Investigator)
- Subretinal hemorrhage in the study eye if any of the following is true: (i) the subretinal hemorrhage represents 50% or more of the total lesion area; (ii) subfoveal blood is 1 or more disc areas in size (iii) subfoveal blood where the fovea is surrounded by less than 270 degrees of visible CNV on FA
- Scar or fibrosis making up \>50% of total lesion area in the study eye
- Anatomic damage to the center of the fovea including fibrosis, scarring or atrophy
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lpath, Inc.lead
Study Sites (44)
Retina Consultants of Arizona
Peoria, Arizona, 85381, United States
Retina Consultants of Arizona
Phoenix, Arizona, 85014, United States
Associated Retina Consultants
Phoenix, Arizona, 85020, United States
Retina Centers, P.C.
Tucson, Arizona, 85704, United States
Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group
Beverly Hills, California, 90211, United States
Retinal Diagnostic Center
Campbell, California, 95008, United States
Specialty Eye Care Medical Center
Glendale, California, 91203, United States
Retina Associates of Orange County
Laguna Hills, California, 92653, United States
Northern California Retina Vitreous Associates
Mountain View, California, 94040, United States
Sagar Kenyon American Eye Institute
New Albany, California, 47150, United States
Retinal Consultants Medical Group, Inc.
Sacramento, California, 95819, United States
Orange County Retina Medical Group
Santa Ana, California, 92705, United States
Miramar Eye Specialists
Ventura, California, 93003, United States
Florida Eye Microsurgical Institute
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33426, United States
Retina Health Center
Fort Myers, Florida, 33907, United States
Retina Specialty Institute
Pensacola, Florida, 32503, United States
Fort Lauderdale Eye Institute
Plantation, Florida, 33324, United States
East Florida Eye Institute
Stuart, Florida, 34994, United States
Center for Retina & Macular Disease
Winter Haven, Florida, 33880, United States
Retina Consultants of Hawaii
‘Aiea, Hawaii, 96701, United States
Midwest Eye Institute
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46290, United States
Central Plains Eye MDs
Wichita, Kansas, 67226, United States
Bennett & Bloom Eye Centers
Louisville, Kentucky, 40207, United States
Retina Group of Washington
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815, United States
Retina Specialists
Towson, Maryland, 21204, United States
Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
TLC Eye Care and Laser Center
Jackson, Michigan, 49202, United States
Retina Consultants of Michigan
Southfield, Michigan, 48034, United States
Island Retina
Shirley, New York, 11967, United States
Charlotte Eye Ear Nose & Throat Associates
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210, United States
Retina & Vitreous Center SO
Ashland, Oregon, 97520, United States
Associates in Ophthalmology
West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, 15122, United States
Palmetto Retina Center
West Columbia, South Carolina, 29169, United States
Retina Research Institute of Texas
Abilene, Texas, 79606, United States
Austin Retina Associates
Austin, Texas, 78705, United States
Retina Research Center
Austin, Texas, 78705, United States
Texas Retina Associates
Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States
Valley Retina Institute
Harlingen, Texas, 78550, United States
Medical Center Ophthalmology Associates
San Antonio, Texas, 78240, United States
Retina Associates of South Texas
San Antonio, Texas, 78240, United States
Rocky Mountain Retina Consultants
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107, United States
Retina Group of Washington
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031, United States
Spokane Eye Clinical Research
Spokane, Washington, 99204, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Susan E. Hazel
- Organization
- Lpath, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Dario A Paggiarino, MD
Lpath, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 9, 2011
First Posted
August 11, 2011
Study Start
August 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 17, 2016
Results First Posted
October 17, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share