Moxy Drug Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arteries
LEVANT 2
A Prospective, Multicenter, Single Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Moxy Drug Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arteries
1 other identifier
interventional
532
4 countries
54
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the superior efficacy and non-inferior safety of the Moxy Drug Coated Balloon by direct comparison to standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) catheter for treatment of stenosis of the femoropopliteal arteries.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
54 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 29, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedMay 12, 2020
May 1, 2020
2.3 years
August 5, 2011
July 14, 2015
May 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Participants With Composite Freedom From All-Cause Peri-Operative (≤30 Day) Death and Freedom From Index Limb Amputation, Index Limb Re-Intervention, and Index-Limb-Related Death at 12 Months Post Index Procedure
Composite of freedom from all-cause peri-operative (≤30 day) death and freedom at 1 year from the following: index limb amputation (above or below the ankle), index limb re-intervention, and index-limb-related death.
12 months post index procedure
Percentage of Participants With Primary Patency of the Target Lesion at 12 Months Post Index Procedure
Primary Patency is defined as the absence of target lesion restenosis (defined by DUS peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) ≥2.5) and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR).
12 months post index procedure
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Number of Acute Device Success at Time of Index Procedure
At time of Index Procedure
Number of Participants With Technical and Procedural Success
At time of Index Procedure
Number of Participants With Primary Patency at 6, 12, and 24 Months Post Index Procedure
6, 12, and 24 months post index procedure
Number of Participants With Alternative Primary Patency at 6, 12, and 24 Months Post Index Procedure
6, 12, and 24 months post index procedure
Number of Participants With Duplex Ultrasound (DUS) Clinical Patency at 6, 12, and 24 Months Post Index Procedure
6, 12, and 24 months post index porcedure
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Moxy Drug Coated Balloon
EXPERIMENTALPaclitaxel coated balloon catheter
Standard Uncoated Angioplasty Balloon
ACTIVE COMPARATORPTA Catheter
Interventions
Subjects will be randomized 2:1 to the Moxy Drug Coated Balloon or Standard Angioplasty Balloon
Subjects will be randomized 2:1 to the drug coated or standard angioplasty balloon
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or non-pregnant female ≥18 years of age;
- Rutherford Clinical Category 2-4;
- Patient is willing to provide informed consent, is geographically stable and comply with the required follow up visits, testing schedule and medication regimen;
- Length ≤15 cm;
- Up to two focal lesions or segments within the designated 15 cm length of vessel may be treated (e.g. two discrete segments, separated by several cm, but both falling within a composite length of ≤15 cm);
- ≥70% stenosis by visual estimate;
- Lesion location starts ≥1 cm below the common femoral bifurcation and terminates distally ≤2 cm below the tibial plateau AND ≥1 cm above the origin of the TP trunk;
- de novo lesion(s) or non-stented restenotic lesion(s) \>90 days from prior angioplasty procedure;
- Lesion is located at least 3 cm from any stent, if target vessel was previously stented;
- Target vessel diameter between ≥4 and ≤6 mm and able to be treated with available device size matrix;
- Successful, uncomplicated (without use of a crossing device) antegrade wire crossing of lesion;
- A patent inflow artery free from significant lesion (≥50% stenosis) as confirmed by angiography (treatment of target lesion acceptable after successful treatment of inflow artery lesions); NOTE: Successful inflow artery treatment is defined as attainment of residual diameter stenosis ≤30% without death or major vascular complication.
- At least one patent native outflow artery to the ankle, free from significant (≥50%) stenosis as confirmed by angiography that has not previously been revascularized (treatment of outflow disease is NOT permitted during the index procedure);
- Contralateral limb lesion(s) cannot be treated within 2 weeks before and/or planned 30 days after the protocol treatment in order to avoid confounding complications;
- No other prior vascular interventions within 2 weeks before and/or planned 30 days after the protocol treatment.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients will be excluded if ANY of the following conditions apply:
- Pregnant or planning on becoming pregnant or men intending to father children;
- Life expectancy of \<5 years;
- Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or other device study or previously enrolled in this study; NOTE: Enrollment in another clinical trial during the follow up period is not allowed.
- History of hemorrhagic stroke within 3 months;
- Previous or planned surgical or interventional procedure within 2 weeks before or within 30 days after the index procedure;
- History of myocardial infarction (MI), thrombolysis or angina within 2 weeks of enrollment;
- Rutherford Class 0, 1, 5 or 6;
- Renal failure or chronic kidney disease with modification in diet in renal disease glomerular filtration rate (MDRD GFR) ≤30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (or serum creatinine ≥2.5 mg/L within 30 days of index procedure or treated with dialysis);
- Prior vascular surgery of the index limb, with the exception of remote common femoral patch angioplasty separated by at least 2 cm from the target lesion;
- Inability to take required study medications or allergy to contrast that cannot be adequately managed with pre- and post-procedure medication;
- Anticipated use of IIb/IIIa inhibitor prior to randomization;
- Ipsilateral retrograde access;
- Composite lesion length is \>15 cm or there is no normal proximal arterial segment in which duplex flow velocity can be measured;
- Significant inflow disease. Successful treatment of inflow disease allowed prior to target lesion treatment;
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- C. R. Bardlead
Study Sites (54)
Good Samaritan Hospital
Los Angeles, California, 90017, United States
North County Radiology Medial Group Inc.
Oceanside, California, 92056, United States
St. Joseph's Hospital
Orange, California, 92868, United States
University of California Davis
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
Medical Center of the Rockies
Loveland, Colorado, 80538, United States
Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States
Washington Cardiology Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
Heart and Vascular Institute
Clearwater, Florida, 33756, United States
Interventional Cardiolgists of Gainesville
Gainesville, Florida, 32605, United States
Munroe Regional Medical Center
Ocala, Florida, 34471, United States
Cardiovascular Associates
Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007, United States
Advocate Christ Medical Center
Oak Lawn, Illinois, 60453, United States
Edward Heart
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, 60181, United States
St. John's Hospital
Springfield, Illinois, 62701, United States
Allen County Cardiology
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46802, United States
St. Vincent Heart Center of Indianapolis
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260, United States
Methodist Medical Center
Des Moines, Iowa, 50309, United States
Promise Regional Medical Center
Hutchinson, Kansas, 67502, United States
St. Francis Heart & Vascular Center
Topeka, Kansas, 66606, United States
Massachusetts Genearl Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Detroit Medical Center
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
St. John's Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48236, United States
Michigan Heart
Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197, United States
Mercy Hosptial
Coon Rapids, Minnesota, 55433, United States
Forrest General Hospital
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, 39401, United States
Deborah Heart and Lung Center
Browns Mills, New Jersey, 08015, United States
Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center
Cherry Hill, New Jersey, 08034, United States
New York University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10010, United States
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Columbia Universtiy Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Wake Heart and Vascular
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27610, United States
Christ Hospital / The Lindner Clinical Trial Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Mid Ohio Cardiology and Vascular Consultants
Columbus, Ohio, 43214, United States
Jobst Vascular Institute
Toledo, Ohio, 43606, United States
Univesrity of Toledo Medical Center
Toledo, Ohio, 43614, United States
Greenville Memorial Hospital
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615, United States
Wellmont Cardiology Services
Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660, United States
East Tennessee Heart Consultants
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37934, United States
Baptist DeSoto in Southaven
Memphis, Tennessee, 38120, United States
Austin Heart P.A.
Austin, Texas, 78705, United States
Medical University of Graz
Graz, A-8036, Austria
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Imelda Ziekenhuis
Bonheiden, 2820, Belgium
Flanders Medical Research Program
Dendermonde, 9200, Belgium
Herz-Zentrum
Bad Krozingen, 79189, Germany
Jewish Hospital
Berlin, 13347, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus
Dresden, 01307, Germany
Diakonissenanstalt zu Flensburg
Flensburg, 24939, Germany
Hamburg University Cardiovascular Center
Hamburg, 22527, Germany
University Leipzig
Leipzig, 04103, Germany
University Magdeburg
Magdeburg, 39120, Germany
University of Tübingen
Tübingen, 72076, Germany
Related Publications (3)
Ouriel K, Adelman MA, Rosenfield K, Scheinert D, Brodmann M, Pena C, Geraghty P, Lee A, White R, Clair DG. Safety of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Dec 23;12(24):2515-2524. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.025. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
PMID: 31575518DERIVEDScheinert D, Schmidt A, Zeller T, Muller-Hulsbeck S, Sixt S, Schroder H, Weiss N, Ketelsen D, Ricke J, Steiner S, Rosenfield K. German Center Subanalysis of the LEVANT 2 Global Randomized Study of the Lutonix Drug-Coated Balloon in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease. J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Jun;23(3):409-16. doi: 10.1177/1526602816644592. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
PMID: 27117972DERIVEDRosenfield K, Jaff MR, White CJ, Rocha-Singh K, Mena-Hurtado C, Metzger DC, Brodmann M, Pilger E, Zeller T, Krishnan P, Gammon R, Muller-Hulsbeck S, Nehler MR, Benenati JF, Scheinert D; LEVANT 2 Investigators. Trial of a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):145-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406235. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
PMID: 26106946DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Anna Lovas
- Organization
- Becton Dickinson
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kenneth Rosenfield, MD
Massachusetts General Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Prof. Dierk Scheinert
University Leipzig
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- All Duplex Ultrasound operators, core lab evaluators, and members of the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) will be blinded to the subject's treatment assignment. Both the subject as well as the Investigator conducting the follow-up visit will be blinded to treatment until the completion of the 12 month visit.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2011
First Posted
August 9, 2011
Study Start
July 1, 2011
Primary Completion
November 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
May 12, 2020
Results First Posted
March 29, 2016
Record last verified: 2020-05