Study Stopped
Study was halted due to lack of funding.
Investigating Motor Cortex Processing for Pain Modulation
1 other identifier
interventional
115
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of different types of interventions (motor learning, somatosensory learning, observation task, mental imagery and tDCS) on the perception of pain and motor cortex excitability in healthy male subjects. This is an exploratory study of healthy subjects only.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Sep 2010
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 29, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 16, 2017
CompletedApril 24, 2020
April 1, 2020
3.6 years
June 29, 2011
April 7, 2015
April 22, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Motor Cortex Excitability MEP Amplitude
We aim to assess the effects of the intervention (ML, SL, OT and MI) on motor cortex excitability as measured by the change in motor evoked potential (using transcranial magnetic stimulation) before and after the given intervention. * For ML: MEP will be measured before and after each ML sessions in the same subject (crossover design - ML sighted/MLblind/ML control). * For SL: MEP will be measured before and after the treatment session in the each groups (parallel design - 1 session per group). * For OT: MEP will be measured before and after the treatment session in the each groups (parallel - 1 session per group). * For MI: MEP will be measured before and after the treatment session in the each groups (parallel design - 1 session per group).
after each intervention
Study Arms (13)
Motor Learning (ML) sighted
EXPERIMENTALIn this arm, subject will perform motor Learning with visual feedback - ML sighted. There will be an anticipated total of 15 subjects in this experimental arm. This arm will be conducted as a cross-over design. The subjects will undergo the three interventions listed (motor learning with visual feedback, motor learning without visual feedback, and control group) in a counterbalanced randomized order. There will be at least 24 hours between each experimental session.
Motor Learning (ML) blind
EXPERIMENTALIn this arm, subject will perform motor Learning without visual feedback - ML blind. There will be an anticipated total of 15 subjects in this experimental arm. This arm will be conducted as a cross-over design. The subjects will undergo the three interventions listed (motor learning with visual feedback, motor learning without visual feedback, and control group) in a counterbalanced randomized order. There will be at least 24 hours between each experimental session.
Motor Learning (ML) control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORIn this arm, subject will perform simple hand movements - control group. There will be an anticipated total of 15 subjects in this experimental arm. This arm will be conducted as a cross-over design. The subjects will undergo the three interventions listed (motor learning with visual feedback, motor learning without visual feedback, and control group) in a counterbalanced randomized order. There will be at least 24 hours between each experimental session.
Somatosensory Learning (SL sighted)
EXPERIMENTALIn this arm, subject will perform sensory Learning with visual feedback - SL sighted. There will be an anticipated total of 10 subjects in this experimental arm. This experimental arm will be conducted in a parallel design with 4 groups (SL sighted, SL blind, Sactivation, SL control).
Somatosensory Learning (SL blind)
EXPERIMENTALIn this arm, subject will perform sensory Learning without visual feedback - SL blind. There will be an anticipated total of 10 subjects in this experimental arm. This experimental arm will be conducted in a parallel design with 4 groups (SL sighted, SL blind, Sactivation, SL control).
Somatosensory Activation (S activation)
EXPERIMENTALIn this arm, subject will receive simple sensory stimulation over their left index finger - Sactivation. There will be an anticipated total of 10 subjects in this experimental arm.This experimental arm will be conducted in a parallel design with 4 groups (SL sighted, SL blind, Sactivation, SL control).
Somatosensory Learning (SL) control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORIn this arm,the subjects will not receive any somatosensory input (SL control group). There will be an anticipated total of 10 subjects in this experimental arm. This experimental arm will be conducted in a parallel design with 4 groups (SL sighted, SL blind, Sactivation, SL control).
Observational Task (OT) - real
EXPERIMENTALIn this arm, the subjects will perform an observational task - observation of hand movements. This experimental arm will be conducted in a parallel design. There will be 15 subjects per intervention.
Observational Task (OT) - control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORIn this arm, the subjects will perform a controlled observational task - observation of geometric shapes. This experimental arm will be conducted in a parallel design. There will be 15 subjects per intervention.
Mental Imagery (MI) - real
EXPERIMENTALIn this arm, the subjects will perform mental imagery - mental imagery of finger movements. This experimental arm will be conducted in a parallel design. There will be 15 subjects per intervention.
Mental Imagery (MI) - control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORIn this arm, the subjects will perform a controlled task - simple mental calculation. This experimental arm will be conducted in a parallel design. There will be 15 subjects per intervention.
transcranial direct current stimulation - tDCS real
EXPERIMENTALtDCS will be applied over the motor cortex for 20minutes at an intensity of 2mA. 15 subjects will be enrolled. The subjects will undergo two interventions, real and sham in a counterbalanced randomized order. There will be at least 3 days between each experimental session.
transcranial direct current stimulation - tDCS sham
PLACEBO COMPARATORtDCS will be applied over the motor cortex for 20minutes at an intensity of 2mA. The stimulation will be stopped after 30seconds. 15 subjects will be enrolled. The subjects will undergo two interventions, real and sham in a counterbalanced randomized order. There will be at least 3 days between each experimental session.
Interventions
Subject will have to draw a set of shapes and words during 20 minutes.
Subjects will perform a learning task involving sensory activation of the hand. The task will consist of learning letters of Braille.
Subjects will watch a 10 second video of a right-handed person performing movements of their left index finger. Subjects will be instructed to watch the video without any other specific instruction.
Subjects will be asked to perform mental imagery of motor practice - finger movements of the left hand for 10 minutes.
Subjects will undergo active and sham tDCS stimulation in a randomized and counterbalanced order. During both active and sham stimulation, we will use electrodes of 35cm\^2, intensity of 2mA for a duration of 20 minutes. The anode electrode will be placed over the right primary motor cortex (M1) and the cathode will be placed over the contralateral supraorbital area. For active stimulation, the current will be on for the duration of 20 minutes. For sham stimulation, the current will ramp up, and then down again for 30 seconds to simulate the sensation of active tDCS.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Provide informed consent to participate in the study
- to 64 years old
- No presence of rheumatologic disease as self reported
- No clinically significant or unstable medical or psychiatric disorder as self reported
- No history of alcohol or substance abuse within the last 6 months as self reported
- No neuropsychiatric co-morbidity as self reported
- No Contraindications to single pulse TMS (TMS will be used to measure cortical excitability)
- history of seizures
- unexplained loss of consciousness
- metal in the head
- frequent or severe headaches or neck pain
- implanted brain medical devices
- No Contraindications to tDCS
- metal in the head
- implanted brain medical devices
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Felipe Fregni
- Organization
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Felipe Fregni, MD, PhD, MPH
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital (SRH)
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2011
First Posted
July 27, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
April 1, 2014
Study Completion
April 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 24, 2020
Results First Posted
March 16, 2017
Record last verified: 2020-04