Study Stopped
Institution decided on starting a new protocol of sedation, with another methods and that´s why this study has not started.
Evaluation of Pediatric Procedural Sedation With Rectal Chloral Hydrate or Intranasal Midazolam
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Thousands of children receive sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions annually, and this number is expected to increase. Children are at higher risk for sedation-related complications than adults. In different scenarios, multiple drugs are used to achieve sedation, each one with particular adverse events that must be monitored and reported. Children that need CT scans for traumatic brain injuries often need sedation, without needing and IV line for that. Chloral hydrate is an hypnotic agent used since 1832 with low incidence of adverse events; however, despite its worldwide use, it's being abandoned due to bitter taste, long time of sedation onset, vomiting and mild sedation. Intranasal midazolam, on the other hand, produces high and fast concentrations on CSF with greater rates of success but probably with higher adverse events. There are no prospective studies with large series of patients using intranasal midazolam. The aim of this study is to determine if nasal midazolam is a safer approach and more effective sedative regimen when compared to rectal chloral hydrate to children undergoing CT scans.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Aug 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 26, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2012
CompletedJune 20, 2013
July 1, 2011
1 year
July 19, 2011
June 19, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Adverse Events
Such as hypoxemia, respiratory depression, vomiting, hypotension
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital (emergency department) stay, an expected average of 2-3 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy of both drugs
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital (emergency department) stay, an expected average of 2-3 hours
Study Arms (2)
Chloral hydrate
ACTIVE COMPARATORChildren undergoing CT scanning will receive in this arm 50 mg per kg of rectal chloral hydrate.
Midazolam
ACTIVE COMPARATORChildren undergoing CT scanning will receive in this arm 0,4 mg/kg of nasal midazolam.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- children undergoing CT scanning for TBI
You may not qualify if:
- epistaxis
- suspected or confirmed skull or nasal fracture
- Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury
- hemodynamically unstable
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Sao Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508000, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Eduardo Mekitarian Filho, MSc
University of Sao Paulo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2011
First Posted
July 26, 2011
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
August 1, 2012
Study Completion
August 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 20, 2013
Record last verified: 2011-07